Repository navigation
Populate correct channel names for RGBA image - #294
Merged
Merged
Conversation
gigony
added
bug
grlee77
requested changes
May 26, 2022
grlee77
left a comment
grlee77
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One question/suggestion, but otherwise this looks good.
I appreciate the new test case. Do you think we should also have a version with a 2D grayscale image?
Signed-off-by: Gigon Bae <gbae@nvidia.com>
grlee77
approved these changes
May 31, 2022
jakirkham
approved these changes
Jun 1, 2022
Member
|
@gpucibot merge |
Member
|
Thanks Gigon! 🙏 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix a segmentation fault raised when loading RGBA image and accessing metadata.
Addresses #262
Signed-off-by: Gigon Bae gbae@nvidia.com