Repository navigation
Cannot reproduce as good audios as the demo shows  #45
Description
Hi, @r9y9, thanks for sharing this great repo. I have run your code using CMU ARCTIC clb data to train a single-speaker wavenet. I think I have set all the model hparams as the same as you show on your demo website. But the test audios coming out of the 170k-step checkpoint still contain many noises. Below is the haprams, and I have made other codes untouched.
Hope you can help me, thanks.
input_type="mulaw",
quantize_channels=256, # 65536 or 256
# Audio:
sample_rate=16000,
# this is only valid for mulaw is True
silence_threshold=2,
num_mels=80,
fmin=125,
fmax=7600,
fft_size=1024,
# shift can be specified by either hop_size or frame_shift_ms
hop_size=256,
frame_shift_ms=None,
min_level_db=-100,
ref_level_db=20,
# whether to rescale waveform or not.
# Let x is an input waveform, rescaled waveform y is given by:
# y = x / np.abs(x).max() * rescaling_max
rescaling=True,
rescaling_max=0.999,
# mel-spectrogram is normalized to [0, 1] for each utterance and clipping may
# happen depends on min_level_db and ref_level_db, causing clipping noise.
# If False, assertion is added to ensure no clipping happens.o0
allow_clipping_in_normalization=True,
# Mixture of logistic distributions:
log_scale_min=float(np.log(1e-14)),
# Model:
# This should equal to `quantize_channels` if mu-law quantize enabled
# otherwise num_mixture * 3 (pi, mean, log_scale)
out_channels=10 * 3,
layers=16,
stacks=2,
residual_channels=512,
gate_channels=512, # split into 2 gropus internally for gated activation
skip_out_channels=256,
dropout=1 - 0.95,
kernel_size=3,
# If True, apply weight normalization as same as DeepVoice3
weight_normalization=True,
# Local conditioning (set negative value to disable))
cin_channels=80,
# If True, use transposed convolutions to upsample conditional features,
# otherwise repeat features to adjust time resolution
upsample_conditional_features=True,
# should np.prod(upsample_scales) == hop_size
upsample_scales=[4, 4, 4, 4],
# Freq axis kernel size for upsampling network
freq_axis_kernel_size=3,
# Global conditioning (set negative value to disable)
# currently limited for speaker embedding
# this should only be enabled for multi-speaker dataset
gin_channels=-1, # i.e., speaker embedding dim
n_speakers=7, # 7 for CMU ARCTIC
# Data loader
pin_memory=True,
num_workers=2,
# train/test
# test size can be specified as portion or num samples
test_size=0.0441, # 50 for CMU ARCTIC single speaker
test_num_samples=None,
random_state=1234,
# Loss
# Training:
batch_size=2,
adam_beta1=0.9,
adam_beta2=0.999,
adam_eps=1e-8,
initial_learning_rate=1e-3,
# see lrschedule.py for available lr_schedule
lr_schedule="noam_learning_rate_decay",
lr_schedule_kwargs={}, # {"anneal_rate": 0.5, "anneal_interval": 50000},
nepochs=2000,
weight_decay=0.0,
clip_thresh=-1,
# max time steps can either be specified as sec or steps
# This is needed for those who don't have huge GPU memory...
# if both are None, then full audio samples are used
max_time_sec=None,
max_time_steps=8000,
# Hold moving averaged parameters and use them for evaluation
exponential_moving_average=True,
# averaged = decay * averaged + (1 - decay) * x
ema_decay=0.9999,
# Save
# per-step intervals
checkpoint_interval=10000,
train_eval_interval=10000,
# per-epoch interval
test_eval_epoch_interval=5,
save_optimizer_state=True,
Activity
r9y9 commentedon Mar 31, 2018
Just to make sure, this should be 256 in your case, right?
I'm wondering if exponential parameter averaging matters. It may improve quality of final model but will take more training time to converge than the case it's disabled. Can you try with the following parameters?
Also, If you want to reproduce my experimental settings, try:
liusongxiang commentedon Mar 31, 2018
@r9y9 , Thank you very much! Yeah, I did use out_channels=10*3, sorry for the miss.
I will try your setting then.
r9y9 commentedon Mar 31, 2018
Ah, you need another important change:
liusongxiang commentedon Mar 31, 2018
Yeah, It's right! I guess I should go over though all your codes first. Thank you very much!
liusongxiang commentedon Apr 20, 2018
@r9y9 Apologise for having so many questions. I used your codes, your hparams settings and the checkpoints to synthesise LJspeech wavs. However, the quality is not as good again as your demo shows. Attached is some generated wavs. Eager to see your suggestions.
Show appreciation in advance.
Shaun.
generated.zip
r9y9 commentedon Apr 21, 2018
You might want to try fineturning your model. As I mention at #1 (comment), I did finetune the model many times. i.e., train 200k steps -> (change some hyper param and let's see how it works) -> train 200k step (lr starts from initial value) -> ... repeated. This might lead faster convergence. As far as I remember correctly I trained the model over 1000k steps.
liusongxiang commentedon Apr 21, 2018
I retrained. The performance is relatively good now. Thank you!
duvtedudug commentedon Apr 28, 2018
@r9y9 so if you stop, then start again from checkpoint, the learning rate resets to initial scheme?
r9y9 commentedon Apr 28, 2018
Yes exactly.
duvtedudug commentedon Apr 28, 2018
Ah okay, that explains why the loss can jump up, then settle back down again. Thanks!
duvtedudug commentedon Apr 28, 2018
@r9y9 can you give an example of what changes you made? i.e. what kind of lr made good progress?
r9y9 commentedon Apr 30, 2018
I was trying to find a good value for
wavenet_vocoder/hparams.py
Line 51 in 1813ea8
r9y9 commentedon May 12, 2018
I'm closing this. Feel free to reopen if you still see the problem.