Repository navigation
planner: fix hash partition prune with is null condition - #58383
Conversation
|
Hi @Defined2014. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #58383 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 73.1849% 74.9382% +1.7532%
================================================
Files 1681 1726 +45
Lines 463027 472891 +9864
================================================
+ Hits 338866 354376 +15510
+ Misses 103358 96282 -7076
- Partials 20803 22233 +1430
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
|
/hold |
d2e86c8 to
ecee0b7
Compare
|
/unhold |
mjonss
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we de-duplicate the partition columns from the expression, we can improve the PR.
mjonss
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM after de-duplication.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mjonss, qw4990 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest |
|
@Defined2014: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/retest |
|
@Defined2014: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #58374
Problem Summary: Let codes in
getUsedHashPartitionssame asgetUsedKeyPartitions.What changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.