llama.cpp BPE tokenization of wiki.test does not match the HF tokenization

[ggerganov]

I did the following test to tokenize wiki.test.raw using our tokenizer and the Python tokenizer.
The expectation is that the outputs will match:

# generate ggml-vocab-falcon.gguf
./convert-falcon-hf-to-gguf.py --vocab-only ~/development/huggingface/falcon-7b/ --outfile ./models/ggml-vocab-falcon.gguf

# tokenize using Python
python3 tests/test-tokenizer-0-falcon.py ~/development/huggingface/falcon-7b/ --fname-tok ./build/wikitext-2-raw/wiki.test.raw

# tokenize using llama.cpp
cd build
make -j
./bin/test-tokenizer-0-falcon ../models/ggml-vocab-falcon.gguf ./wikitext-2-raw/wiki.test.raw

# compare the results
cmp ./wikitext-2-raw/wiki.test.raw.tok ./wikitext-2-raw/wiki.test.raw.tokcpp 
./wikitext-2-raw/wiki.test.raw.tok ./wikitext-2-raw/wiki.test.raw.tokcpp differ: char 1, line 1

The results are pretty close, but not exactly the same. Any ideas why the test does not pass?
I thought that #3252 would resolve this

cc @goerch

[goerch]

That is a nice test. I made some modifications to get more detailed outputs of the tests and see differences like

1. Problem with endoftext

2. Non greediness

[goerch]

Intermediate results of debugging: bpe_gpt2_preprocess seems to do the right thing, llm_tokenizer_bpe::tokenize seems to be subtly broken, although it looks very similar to examples/gptneox-wip. Paging @cmp-nct in need for help, because git blame doesn't work very well here.

[goerch]

llm_tokenizer_bpe::tokenize seems to be subtly broken

I implemented an independent port of the gpt2-tokenizer(will share the code if someone is interested) and it shows the same behavior as the llama.cpp tokenizer. I also tried to use the slow tokenizer of HF (i.e. the Python implementation) to compare without success, i.e. I didn't get it working (any tips appreciated!). I tried to understand the fast tokenizer implemented here, which looks like it supports some advanced features. This seems hopeless until we are going to debug the complete HF stack (which I currently don't know how to). BTW: I'm not talking about the endoftext problem here.

[jploski]

llm_tokenizer_bpe::tokenize seems to be subtly broken

I implemented an independent port of the gpt2-tokenizer(will share the code if someone is interested) and it shows the same behavior as the llama.cpp tokenizer. I also tried to use the slow tokenizer of HF (i.e. the Python implementation) to compare without success, i.e. I didn't get it working (any tips appreciated!). I tried to understand the fast tokenizer implemented here, which looks like it supports some advanced features. This seems hopeless until we are going to debug the complete HF stack (which I currently don't know how to). BTW: I'm not talking about the endoftext problem here.

You can create the slow (or fast) GPT2 tokenizer in tests/test-tokenizer-0-falcon.py like so:

from transformers import GPT2TokenizerFast, GPT2Tokenizer
slow_tokenizer = GPT2Tokenizer(vocab_file=dir_tokenizer + '/vocab.json', merges_file=dir_tokenizer + '/merges.txt')
fast_tokenizer = GPT2TokenizerFast(tokenizer_file=dir_tokenizer + '/tokenizer.json')

You will have to create the files vocab.json and merges.txt yourself. The file vocab.json should contain only the vocab map from Falcon's tokenizer.json (e.g. see https://huggingface.co/gpt2/blob/main/vocab.json). The file merges.txt should contain only the contents of the merges array, one array element per line (i.e. space separated token pairs, e.g. see https://huggingface.co/gpt2/blob/main/merges.txt).

You will notice that the slow tokenizer tokenizes "2000" differently ("20" "00") than the fast one ("200" "0"). So yes, I think we are running into a HF implementation bug, but the cpp code tokenizes like the (presumably now less popular) slow tokenizer.

And the <|endoftext|> in the front is trivial, it's just the artificially injected BOS token (which I believe is a Llama thing and should not be inserted for Falcon).

[ggerganov]

So maybe it is best to switch to the slow tokenizer in test-tokenizer-0-falcon.py and close the issue if things match?
Probably also add this as a ctest

[goerch]

I could imagine this to be hairy problem, because I'd assume a couple of models have been trained with the fast tokenizers?

[jploski]

I could imagine this to be hairy problem, because I'd assume a couple of models have been trained with the fast tokenizers?

Yes, I suppose everyone uses the fast ones because they are default, so having a tokenizer in llama.cpp which behaves differently is not good.

One point which I am still unclear about is whether the fast tokenizer, which for some reason (also) wants tokenizer.json rather than just the vocab.json/merges.txt file as input maybe relies on some extra information from tokenizer.json which makes it behave differently in our test case. So there's still some chance it might not be a bug in the HF implementation after all, but rather our lack of understanding of it. I'm hoping to learn more from HF's response to huggingface/tokenizers#1363.

[apage43]

The discrepancy here is because Falcon's tokenizer.json specifies a different pre_tokenizer.

Most BPE-using models use the config that mimics GPT2 - i.e. "pretokenizing" is done with the standard regex:

  "pre_tokenizer": {
    "type": "ByteLevel",
    "add_prefix_space": false,
    "trim_offsets": true,
    "use_regex": true
  },

replacing with this gets consistent behavior with "slow", but that's not really what we want. Falcon instead specifies this:

"pre_tokenizer": {
  "type": "Sequence",
  "pretokenizers": [
    {
      "type": "Punctuation",
      "behavior": "Contiguous"
    },
    {
      "type": "ByteLevel",
      "add_prefix_space": false,
      "trim_offsets": true,
      "use_regex": true
    },
    {
      "type": "Digits",
      "individual_digits": false
    },
    {
      "type": "Split",
      "pattern": {
        "Regex": "[0-9][0-9][0-9]"
      },
      "behavior": "Isolated",
      "invert": false
    }
  ]
}

that is, it first applies punctuation splitting before the standard regex, then the standard regex, then "Digits" (force spans of digits to be separated from non-digits) , then "isolated" mode custom regex splitting on a regex matching 3 consecutive digits so that no token over 3 digits long makes it past the pretokenizer

its the last one that seems to cause the discrepancy here - but the problem is that to be fully consistent with tokenizers we will need to implement some of the less common pre_tokenizer options

[bobqianic]

@apage43 cc @ggerganov

Could you take a look at my code? I followed the procedure you outlined and even checked the source code, but I'm still getting inconsistent results. Is there a way to directly test the pre-tokenizer without comparing the final output of the tokenizer? This might help us pinpoint the exact issue. #5613

I'm really confident that my GPT-2 style pre-tokenizer works perfectly. I carefully followed the regex pattern and tested it extensively, using more than 10GB of data that included both synthetic and real examples.

Edit: Ah, I understand now! The = symbol isn't classified under Unicode punctuation!

[github-actions]

This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 14 days since being marked as stale.