Skip to content

Streamline and somewhat update MP TCKs - #25403

Merged
arjantijms merged 1 commit into
eclipse-ee4j:8.0from
arjantijms:mp_tck
Mar 10, 2025
Merged

Streamline and somewhat update MP TCKs#25403
arjantijms merged 1 commit into
eclipse-ee4j:8.0from
arjantijms:mp_tck

Conversation

@arjantijms

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

<groupId>org.glassfish.main.tests.tck</groupId>
<artifactId>tck</artifactId>
<version>8.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<groupId>org.eclipse.ee4j</groupId>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was trying to run the TCK against arbitirary GlassFish versions. With the project parent it insisted upon having basically all of GlassFisg build in the version that the project happened to be. This is unnecessary when testing with such specific version.

@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
<!DOCTYPE suite SYSTEM "http://testng.org/testng-1.0.dtd" >

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this file needed? Isn't it retrieved from the org.eclipse.microprofile.jwt:microprofile-jwt-auth-tck dependency already?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's to be consistent with the other two mp tcks; they do the same thing

@arjantijms
arjantijms merged commit 9a4fd15 into eclipse-ee4j:8.0 Mar 10, 2025
@arjantijms
arjantijms deleted the mp_tck branch March 10, 2025 11:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants