I double-checked the code and the docs about the transaction batch are not correct. That piece was coming from OrientDB which allowed some control over isolation. With ArcadeDB the level is always Read committed, which means dirty reads are not possible, but you can get Nonrepeatable Read and Phantom Read. It would be pretty easy to support both REPEATABLE_READ and SERIALIZABLE, I'm opening an issue for that.
Originally posted by @lvca in #994 (comment)
I double-checked the code and the docs about the transaction batch are not correct. That piece was coming from OrientDB which allowed some control over isolation. With ArcadeDB the level is always
Read committed, which means dirty reads are not possible, but you can getNonrepeatable ReadandPhantom Read. It would be pretty easy to support both REPEATABLE_READ and SERIALIZABLE, I'm opening an issue for that.Originally posted by @lvca in #994 (comment)