Jump to content

User talk:MatthewPlayThrough

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 29 days ago by Morogris in topic A barnstar for you!

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi MatthewPlayThrough! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 20:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pokémon Horizons – The Search for Laqua has been accepted

[edit]
Pokémon Horizons – The Search for Laqua, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waddles 🗩 🖉 04:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beast Games has been accepted

[edit]
Beast Games, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 02:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 People's March (December 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Notability is almost there, but not quite. The WaPo article and the 19th piece are okay, but #1 is a press announcement, and #3 is an interview, which don't count. Can you find at least one more solid source that squarely meets the WP:GNG standard?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, MatthewPlayThrough! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

I found you.

[edit]

Howdy, Matthew, well... whats going on with you in Robloxiapedia? I'm Anna Aviation. Anna Aviation ✈️ (talk | contribs) 01:13, 2 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sup! Didn't know that you had a Wikipedia account. Well, I am doing okay right now, but I am still worried. Anyways, chatting in Wikipedia feel off, so we can discuss this in Fandom. MatthewPlayThrough (talk) 01:16, 2 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Alright. Anna Aviation ✈️ (talk | contribs) 01:18, 2 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pokémon Horizons – Mega Voltage (March 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Prince of Erebor was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 03:40, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Trump rally at Madison Square Garden

[edit]

Information icon Hello, MatthewPlayThrough. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Trump rally at Madison Square Garden, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:List of rallies for the Kamala Harris presidential campaign

[edit]

Information icon Hello, MatthewPlayThrough. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of rallies for the Kamala Harris presidential campaign, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Trump rally at Madison Square Garden

[edit]

Hello, MatthewPlayThrough. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Trump rally at Madison Square Garden".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:05, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:List of rallies for the Kamala Harris presidential campaign

[edit]

Hello, MatthewPlayThrough. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of rallies for the Kamala Harris presidential campaign".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 3 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Abundant Life Christian School shooting

[edit]

Information icon Hello, MatthewPlayThrough. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abundant Life Christian School shooting, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:10, 18 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Towson, Maryland shooting

[edit]

Information icon Hello, MatthewPlayThrough. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Towson, Maryland shooting, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Terapagos

[edit]

Information icon Hello, MatthewPlayThrough. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Terapagos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:08, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pokémon Horizons – Mega Voltage (June 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please wait until it is released.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 10:02, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Abundant Life Christian School shooting

[edit]

Hello, MatthewPlayThrough. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Abundant Life Christian School shooting".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 18:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Towson, Maryland shooting

[edit]

Hello, MatthewPlayThrough. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Towson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:18, 18 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Terapagos

[edit]

Hello, MatthewPlayThrough. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Terapagos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:52, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2025 New York City shooting for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 New York City shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 New York City shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Czarking0 (talk) 03:04, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Schlep (YouTuber) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Schlep (YouTuber) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schlep (YouTuber) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Based5290 :3 (talk) 12:50, 16 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shooting of Charlie Kirk (September 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GGOTCC was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Shooting of Charlie Kirk instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
GGOTCC 20:08, 10 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Pokémon Horizons – Mega Voltage

[edit]

Information icon Hello, MatthewPlayThrough. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pokémon Horizons – Mega Voltage, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 17 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@MatthewPlayThrough: If Pokémon Horizons – Mega Voltage has been released, it might be a good time to resubmit the article. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 01:46, 23 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: January 2026 North American winter storm (January 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eastmain was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at January 2026 North American winter storm January 2026 United States winter storm instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Eastmain (talkcontribs) 01:30, 23 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: January 2026 North American winter storm (January 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hurricane Wind and Fire was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at January 2026 United States winter storm instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 03:41, 23 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Killing of Alex Pretti

[edit]

I restored the sourced content you removed without comment in this edit. If you believe it should be removed, please take it to the Talk page, and please use edit summaries in the future to explain your changes.--Orgullomoore (talk) 00:22, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for letting me know. My apologies. MatthewPlayThrough (talk) 00:29, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

A Barnstar for you?

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For your work on Kristi Noem. Bearian (talk) 22:30, 5 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

2026 FIFA World Cup final

[edit]

Please discuss major changes and copyedits before implementing them. The last round included major inaccuracies that have been reverted. SounderBruce 06:27, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I am very sorry for the mistakes I done. I promise to be careful next time when working on the article. MatthewPlayThrough (talk) 16:32, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

2026 World Cup final

[edit]

Hey there! I just wanted to clarify the reason for one of my edits that you recently reverted. The sentence "The tournament was contested by hosts United States, Mexico, and Canada" is less than ideal grammatically, because "United States" is almost always preceded by "the" in English. That's why I changed it to The tournament was contested by hosts Canada, Mexico, and the United States". Then I changed the order of the hosts in the Background section to match the new order in the lead. Please let me know if this makes sense. OrdinaryOtter(talk) 15:41, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry if I took a while.
Now thinking about it, I believe that your reasoning makes sense. I wrote "hosts United States, Mexico, and Canada" in the first place because there was a similar sentence ("hosts South Korea and Japan") in the lead section of the 2002 World Cup final. However, South Korea is not grammatically preceded by "the" and the United States is. I apologize for the grammar mistakes I made. I am still learning on how to improve my writing skills on here, so I don't have to use references from previous articles. Thank you for explaining your reasoning. I hope you have a good day :) MatthewPlayThrough (talk) 16:29, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the kind reply. I made edits based on the reasoning we just discussed. Take care :) OrdinaryOtter(talk) 18:34, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

World Cup final minor edits

[edit]

Hello again!

I just wanted to point out a problem I found with this edit. The new version makes it unclear what those seven matches were, or even if they were part of this World Cup. OrdinaryOtter(talk) 01:54, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Added "in the World Cup" to clarify that the matches were held at the stadium. MatthewPlayThrough (talk) 02:34, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Copyediting

[edit]

Hey again!

I wanted to give you a little feedback about copyediting regarding this edit. The reason for the edit is unclear. If your changes make the sentence carry the same meaning, why change it? Next time, please explain why your version is superior. In this case, the word "into" is incorrect, as the correct English phrasing is "ended in a scoreless draw". Also, while the word "owing" is correct English, the word "due" is used much more frequently, at least in American English, and it's also shorter. I made an edit that addressed these two problems while leaving your other changes to that sentence intact. OrdinaryOtter(talk) 03:03, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

MatthewPlayThrough: A few more notes.

  1. Please avoid slightly vague statements like "Argentina took the lead in the first half through Messi". It is simpler and clearer to state "...took the lead in the first half with a goal by Messi". It leaves no doubt about what occurred.
  2. For the general reader, it is important to clarify the difference between career World Cup goals across multiple World Cups and goals scored in a single World Cup. That's why the phrase "at World Cup tournaments" was in the article.
  3. Make sure to identify which team players are on. I'm restoring "of Cape Verde" so the reader knows immediately which team Sidny Lopes Cabral plays for. OrdinaryOtter(talk) 23:28, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Match summary

[edit]

Hello!

I have a few questions and comments about this edit.

  1. If we state that Allister "received no yellow card from the referee" we have to say why we're mentioning it. We have to talk about how it was controversial. Otherwise, mentioning it makes no sense; we don't add the clause "but received no yellow card from the referee" after every mention of a foul.
  2. What is the purpose of this sentence? "Olmo ran down the middle of the pitch and attempted to find Marc Cucurella from the left, but Gonzalo Montiel intercepted". We can't mention every time a player tried to make a pass, but failed. If we keep this in, we need to explain why this play was notable.
  3. I had put in this version: "...Cucurella's left-footed shot went wide of the goal." The version you restored is much longer: "Cucurella had an opportunity to score when he struck a left-footed shot from the far corner but went wide of the goal." Shots are always understood to be opportunities to score, so this seems redundant. Also, what is the far corner? We have to explain what that means.

Thanks for your time, and I hope you have a good day. OrdinaryOtter(talk) 04:29, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1986 FIFA World Cup final, a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Herald was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Great job with the work you've done with 1986 FIFA World Cup final! Morogris () 05:41, 15 August 2026 (UTC)Reply