"...officers would first seek mediation between the parties, which he described as normal procedure..." Here's a cultural lesson for foreigners! What Ms Pimpaporn describes fits multiple Thai Penal Code offences, including: Section 278 / 279 — indecent acts without consent Section 276 — sexual assault (depending on evidence) Section 282 — obscene acts in public Section 391 — causing humiliation or distress These are criminal offences, not civil disputes. In most countries criminal offences belong to the state, not the victim. Police must investigate. Prosecution proceeds regardless of victim preference. And victims cannot “drop charges”. In Thailand, criminal offences technically belong to the state, but in practice, police treat many offences as victim‑driven. If the victim wants compensation as Ms Pimpaporn has indicated, police often adjust their behaviour accordingly. While this is not how the law is written, it’s how the system functions! And this is why Lt Col Konkong would say “mediation is normal procedure”. It's also why “denied entry” was used instead of "arrested", it keeps the suspect in Thailand just long enough for mediation, but not long enough to require remand hearings.