Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Physics > Atomic Physics

arXiv:1801.09977 (physics)
[Submitted on 30 Jan 2018 (v1), last revised 1 Mar 2019 (this version, v3)]

Title:Comparing many-body approaches against the helium atom exact solution

Authors:Jing Li, N. D. Drummond, Peter Schuck, Valerio Olevano
View a PDF of the paper titled Comparing many-body approaches against the helium atom exact solution, by Jing Li and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Over time, many different theories and approaches have been developed to tackle the many-body problem in quantum chemistry, condensed-matter physics, and nuclear physics. Here we use the helium atom, a real system rather than a model, and we use the exact solution of its SchrÃķdinger equation as a benchmark for comparison between methods. We present new results beyond the random-phase approximation (RPA) from a renormalized RPA (r-RPA) in the framework of the self-consistent RPA (SCRPA) originally developed in nuclear physics, and compare them with various other approaches like configuration interaction (CI), quantum Monte Carlo (QMC), time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT), and the Bethe-Salpeter equation on top of the GW approximation. Most of the calculations are consistently done on the same footing, e.g. using the same basis set, in an effort for a most faithful comparison between methods.
Comments: 23 pages, 9 figures, 11 tables
Subjects: Atomic Physics (physics.atom-ph); Other Condensed Matter (cond-mat.other); Nuclear Theory (nucl-th)
Cite as: arXiv:1801.09977 [physics.atom-ph]
  (or arXiv:1801.09977v3 [physics.atom-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.09977
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: SciPost Phys. 6, 040 (2019)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.4.040
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Valerio Olevano [view email]
[v1] Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:24:19 UTC (251 KB)
[v2] Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:40:51 UTC (254 KB)
[v3] Fri, 1 Mar 2019 14:47:03 UTC (256 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Comparing many-body approaches against the helium atom exact solution, by Jing Li and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

physics.atom-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-01
Change to browse by:
cond-mat
cond-mat.other
nucl-th
physics

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences