Error in creating nested `ArrayNode`s with `JsonNode.withArray()`

[SaiKrishna369]

Describe the bug
Attempt to create a new path to an ArrayNode with withArray method where the pointer would include an array index in between is failing with java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException.

Version information
2.14.2

To Reproduce

@Test
public static void test_nestedArray() {
        ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
        String json = "{}";
        try {
            JsonNode jsonObject = mapper.readTree(json);
            ArrayNode aN = jsonObject.withArray("/key1/array1/0/element1", JsonNode.OverwriteMode.ALL, true);
            aN.add("v1");
            aN.add("v2");
            aN.add("v3");
        }
        catch (Exception e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }

Executing this method is throwing:

java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot replace context node (of type `com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.node.ObjectNode`) using `withArray()` with  JSON Pointer '/key1/array1/0/element1'
	at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.node.BaseJsonNode._reportWrongNodeType(BaseJsonNode.java:257)
	at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.node.BaseJsonNode.withArray(BaseJsonNode.java:193)
	at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonNode.withArray(JsonNode.java:1319)

Expected behavior
A new path with key1 as object, containing array1 whose first element is an object containing an array with name element1 should be created, i.e. the resultant json should be{"key1": { "array1": [ {"element1": ["v1", "v2", "v3"] } ] } }.

Additional context
ArrayNode aN = jsonObject.withArray("/key1/array1/element1", JsonNode.OverwriteMode.ALL, true) and ObjectNode oN = jsonObject.withObject("/key1/array1/0/element1", JsonNode.OverwriteMode.ALL, true) are working as expected.

[pjfanning]

As the exception message says, this is unsupported. You cannot currently use withArray() to convert an ObjectNode. If you want to change the behaviour, maybe you could look at submitting a PR?

[cowtowncoder]

I'd have to double-check this, but it might be a bug. With OverwriteMode.ALL it should be legal to replace the last node.
But I may have missed something.

[cowtowncoder]

Yup, a bug indeed. Fixed in 2.14 branch, but most likely released next in 2.15.1 release.