<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Coder Legion - Recent posts tagged verifiedornot</title>
<link>https://coderlegion.com/tag/verifiedornot</link>
<description>Powered by Question2Answer</description>
<item>
<title>Verified or Not? Ep. 1 — Testing 9 Engines Against OWASP Juice Shop</title>
<link>https://coderlegion.com/19657/verified-or-not-ep-1-testing-9-engines-against-owasp-juice-shop</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome to Verified or Not — the series where I put Debuggix to the test against real, &lt;br&gt;
known repositories to prove it actually works.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the first 6 episodes, I'm not scanning random code. I'm targeting repos that the &lt;br&gt;
security community already knows inside and out. Deliberately vulnerable apps. Repos &lt;br&gt;
with documented issues. Codebases with published threat models.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why? Because anyone can claim their scanner works. I'm proving it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EPISODE 1: OWASP Juice Shop&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The most famous vulnerable web app in the world. 38,000 GitHub stars. Built by the &lt;br&gt;
Open Web Application Security Project to teach developers how NOT to write code.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Juice Shop has over 100 documented vulnerabilities spanning the entire OWASP Top Ten. &lt;br&gt;
SQL injection. XSS. Path traversal. Broken authentication. It's all there, on purpose.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;THE TEST&lt;br&gt;
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━&lt;br&gt;
If Debuggix is real, it should detect this is a deliberately vulnerable training app &lt;br&gt;
and NOT flag it as a production emergency. A dumb scanner would dump 500 findings and &lt;br&gt;
tell you to fix them. A smart scanner reads the documentation and understands context.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;THE SCAN&lt;br&gt;
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━&lt;br&gt;
• 9 engines running in parallel&lt;br&gt;
• Semgrep, Bandit, Gitleaks, TruffleHog, Trivy, ESLint, Hadolint, Checkov, OSV-Scanner&lt;br&gt;
• 945 source files&lt;br&gt;
• 134,000 lines of code&lt;br&gt;
• Scan time: ~3 minutes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;THE RESULTS&lt;br&gt;
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━&lt;br&gt;
• Needs Attention: 0&lt;br&gt;
• Reviewed: 32&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All 32 findings were automatically classified as intentional. Why? Because Debuggix &lt;br&gt;
read the README and SECURITY.md. It detected the keywords &quot;deliberately vulnerable&quot; &lt;br&gt;
and &quot;OWASP.&quot; It knew this app was built to be hacked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the difference between a scanner that just looks for patterns and a scanner &lt;br&gt;
that understands what it's looking at.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WHAT THIS PROVES&lt;br&gt;
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━&lt;br&gt;
✓ Multi-engine scanning catches what single tools miss&lt;br&gt;
✓ AI filtering eliminates noise (32 findings, 0 false alarms)&lt;br&gt;
✓ Documentation-aware scanning understands intent&lt;br&gt;
✓ Known vulnerable repos are correctly identified&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NEXT EPISODE&lt;br&gt;
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━&lt;br&gt;
Episode 2: I scan another known-vulnerable repo. Will it hold up?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; LINKS&lt;br&gt;
• Scan your repo free: &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;https://debuggix.space&quot;&gt;https://debuggix.space&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
• Juice Shop: &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;https://github.com/juice-shop/juice-shop&quot;&gt;https://github.com/juice-shop/juice-shop&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
• OWASP: &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;https://owasp.org&quot;&gt;https://owasp.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; NEW EPISODE EVERY WEEK&lt;br&gt;
Episodes 1–6: Testing against known repos to prove Debuggix works.&lt;br&gt;
Episode 7+: Scanning trending repos. Verified or Not?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>Videos</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://coderlegion.com/19657/verified-or-not-ep-1-testing-9-engines-against-owasp-juice-shop</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 12:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>