Coder Legion - Recent posts tagged small

Zapier for Small Business: Pricing, Limits, and Best Fit

Sat, 24 Oct 2026 15:50:00 +0000

Zapier is a strong first automation platform for a small business that needs a simple workflow live quickly. The Free plan is useful for testing one-trigger, one-action workflows, Professional unlocks multi-step automation, and Team adds shared connections and controls. The trade-off is task billing: every successful counted action uses capacity, so cost can rise as workflows become longer or run more often.

Prices and task rules can change. The plan details below were verified against Zapier's official pricing and task documentation on August 1, 2026.

Quick decision: is Zapier the right fit?

Situation	Best starting point	Why	Watch for
One simple app-to-app workflow	Zapier Free	Fast setup, 100 tasks per month, and two-step workflows.	The free plan allows one trigger and one action per workflow.
Several multi-step workflows	Zapier Professional	Multi-step workflows, premium apps, webhooks, and built-in logic.	Successful actions and some AI steps consume tasks.
A team sharing automations	Zapier Team	Shared workflows, folders, app connections, roles, and SAML SSO.	Confirm the current user and task limits before buying.
High-volume or complex branching	Compare Make and n8n	Another billing model or self-hosting may reduce cost and add control.	More control also creates more setup and maintenance work.

What Zapier actually is

Zapier is a workflow automation tool, in the same family as Make and n8n. You build a Zap: a trigger that starts it, then one or more actions that do the work. New lead in a form, then create a CRM record, send an email, post a Slack alert. That chain is your Zap. It is the same trigger-steps-workflow model I walked through in what is n8n, just with Zapier's names on it.

What Zapier is genuinely best at

Zapier is not the cheapest tool, and I will get to that. But it is the best at several things that matter to a small business:

The most integrations, by a wide margin. Zapier connects 9,000+ apps. If you use a tool, even a niche one, the odds that Zapier already supports it are higher than with any competitor. That alone solves a lot of "but does it work with ___" questions.
The easiest start. The setup is the friendliest in the category. Pick a trigger, pick an action, map a few fields, turn it on. Most people get their first Zap running without reading a manual.
It is reliable and well-documented. Zapier has been doing this the longest, so between templates, help docs, and the guides online, you are rarely the first person to try what you are trying.
A practical free plan for testing. It includes 100 tasks per month, unlimited workflow assets, and two-step workflows with one trigger and one action.

Zapier includes more than workflows

Zapier now bundles more of its core platform into the Free, Professional, and Team plans. That matters because a small business can keep a lightweight form, data table, and automation in the same account:

Forms and Interfaces collect data through simple pages without requiring a separate form product for a basic intake flow.
Tables stores leads, projects, inventory, or workflow state. Zapier's current task-rate page lists Tables and Forms among the built-in tools that do not use tasks.
Zapier MCP lets supported AI assistants call Zapier actions. The current rate is two tasks per MCP tool call, so usage still needs a budget.

The platform is more unified than it was, but "included" does not mean unlimited. Plans still have task, record, page, user, and feature limits. Check the live plan comparison before building a core process around any one allowance.

What Zapier costs

Zapier bills most automation work with tasks. A standard successful action normally uses one task. Polling triggers do not use tasks, and Zapier currently lists built-in tools such as Filters, Paths, Formatter, Delay, Tables, and Forms at zero tasks.

Plan	Published starting price	Useful limit or feature	Best fit
Free	$0	100 tasks per month and two-step workflows.	Testing one small automation.
Professional	$19.99/month, billed annually	Starts at 750 tasks with multi-step workflows and premium apps.	An individual or small team with real production workflows.
Team	$69/month, billed annually	Shared workflows and app connections, roles, and up to 25 users.	A team that needs collaboration and account controls.
Enterprise	Custom	Governance, observability, deployment controls, and enterprise support.	Large or regulated organizations.

These are starting prices published by Zapier and may change with billing interval, currency, tax, task tier, or product updates. I put the billing models side by side with Make and n8n in Zapier vs Make vs n8n pricing.

Where Zapier can get expensive

The same task-based pricing that keeps simple Zaps cheap is what bites at scale. Picture a four-step Zap that runs 500 times a month. That is roughly 2,000 tasks, and a fifth step adds another 500. The cost grows with both how many steps you have and how often they run. For a light, simple automation this is a non-issue. For a heavy multi-step workflow running thousands of times a month, the invoice is where Zapier tends to lose to Make and n8n.

AI steps need a separate check. Since June 15, 2026, AI by Zapier uses model tiers: Standard uses one task per step, Advanced uses three, and Premium uses five. Tool calls add tasks at the same tier. A workflow that looks like one AI step in the editor can therefore consume more than one task per run.

It is not a flaw, it is a trade-off. You are paying for the easiest, most-connected tool on the market. The question is just whether that premium is worth it for your specific workflow.

What you can automate with Zapier

Theory is dull, so here is what Zapier actually does for a small team. Each of these is a real Zap you can build today:

Catch and follow up on new leads before they go cold, pulling them from forms, email, and chat into your CRM and inbox. See small business automation in the Philippines.
Automate the right thing first. Most small businesses pick the wrong starting point. Here is how to choose a first Zap that actually pays off: most businesses automate the wrong thing first.
Turn a free Google Form into an intake pipeline, so every submission is logged, tagged, and acted on without you touching it. See how to connect Google Forms to Sheets and Gmail without Zapier.
Replace manual copy-paste between the apps you already pay for, so nobody moves data by hand all day.

None of these need a developer on staff. They need a clear process and a tool that can run it. Before you commit a core process to it, it is worth knowing what the same workflow costs on each platform, which I broke down in how much it costs to automate lead follow-up.

Is Zapier right for your business?

Often, yes, especially at the start. Zapier is the right choice when you value simplicity and breadth over price, when you need an integration with a less common app, or when you just want your first few automations live this afternoon without a learning curve. For a small team automating a handful of simple things, it is hard to beat.

It becomes a weaker fit when a workflow has many counted actions, runs at high volume, or must be self-hosted. At that point compare n8n, which prices Cloud by full workflow executions and offers a self-hosted option, or Make's credit model. If the source and destination already have a dependable native integration, use that first. The pricing comparison shows the same workflow under all three billing models.

Where to learn Zapier

Zapier has its own free learning hub. It is lighter than Make's academy and you can get through it quickly, but it gives you the core ideas fast, which is exactly what Zapier is about. For most people that plus the in-product templates is enough to get going.

Personally, the resource I would point a beginner to is this free 4-hour Zapier course from freeCodeCamp. Four hours sounds like a lot, but the delivery is so easy it flies by. One rule: do not just watch it. Build every example alongside the video in your own account, that is the difference between having seen it and being able to do it. freeCodeCamp is a great channel in general, with a huge amount of free material worth digging into.

Where to start

Pick the most annoying repetitive task in your week and describe it in one sentence: when X happens, do Y, then tell me. Build that one Zap on the free plan and let it run for a week. Keep it small; a Zap that quietly saves ten minutes a day teaches you more than an ambitious one that breaks on its first edge case. Once it is running, the next few tasks become obvious. If you would rather have the first few built properly, with error handling so they do not fail silently, that is what I do.

Sources

Not sure which tool fits?

Tell me the most repetitive task in your week. I can map a simple workflow for it and tell you honestly whether to build it on Zapier, Make, or n8n, and what it will cost to run.

Get the map

Originally published on FloxoLab.

Make for Small Business: What It Is, What It Costs, and When to Use It

Fri, 23 Oct 2026 15:50:00 +0000

If you have compared automation tools for more than five minutes, you have met Make. It used to be called Integromat, and it is best known for one thing: a visual builder that looks like a real diagram, with little circles connected by lines that show your data moving from one app to the next. For a lot of people, that picture is the moment automation finally clicks.

This guide is the honest version. What Make is, what it does better than almost anyone, what it costs, and where it starts to pinch for a growing small business.

What Make actually is

Make is a workflow automation tool, in the same family as Zapier and n8n. You build a scenario: a trigger that starts it, then modules (the steps) that do the work, all laid out on a visual canvas. Read a row, send an email, call an API, filter the junk. It is the same trigger-steps-workflow model I broke down in what is n8n, just with Make's own names on it.

What Make is genuinely great at

Make is particularly useful when a workflow needs visible branching and data transformation:

Visual flow control. Routers split one input down several paths, iterators loop over a list, and aggregators bundle the results back together on the canvas.
Built-in error handling. This is the underrated one. You can attach error handlers to a module and choose what happens when a step fails: retry, skip, roll back, or stop cleanly. A failed run does not silently lose your data, which matters the moment a real business process depends on it.
Data stores. Make has a small built-in database, so a scenario can remember things between runs: a list of processed orders, a counter, a lookup table. That kind of memory usually means bolting on a spreadsheet elsewhere.
A broad integration catalog plus a generic HTTP module for services with an accessible API. Compare the actual module count and monthly volume before assuming it will be cheaper than Zapier.

What Make costs

Make bills with credits, the term that replaced operations. For non-AI apps, one operation is generally one credit, and most modules use one credit each time they perform an operation. On August 1, 2026, the public pricing page listed Free with 1,000 credits and Core from $12/month for 10,000 credits when billed annually. Prices and AI credit rules may change.

The thing to watch is how credits add up. A scenario with several modules spends a credit per module, per run. At low volume this is comfortable and cheap. As volume climbs, or as scenarios get longer, the credit count grows with every step you add. It is predictable, but it does scale with complexity. I put real numbers next to Zapier and n8n in Zapier vs Make vs n8n pricing.

Where Make can pinch

A few honest caveats. First, the learning curve is a little steeper than Zapier. The same power that makes the canvas great also means there is more to understand before your first scenario runs. Second, because credits are spent per module per run, a heavy, many-step automation running thousands of times a month can get more expensive than you expected, and you cannot host it yourself to escape the meter.

Third, watch your scheduled triggers. A scenario that polls for new data runs on a timer whether or not anything is waiting, so one set to check every 15 minutes wakes up around 2,880 times a month. Exactly how those empty checks are billed has shifted as Make moved from operations to credits, so confirm the current rules for your plan in Make's docs. Either way the safe habit is the same: use instant (webhook) triggers where the app supports them, and do not poll more often than you actually need.

None of these is a dealbreaker. They are just the trade-offs to know before you commit a core business process to it.

What you can automate with Make

Theory is dull, so here is what Make actually does for a small team. Each of these is a real scenario you can build:

Catch and follow up on new leads before they go cold, pulling them from forms, email, and chat into one place. See small business automation in the Philippines.
Route one input down several paths at once, which is where Make's visual canvas earns its keep: send a new order to your CRM, your accounting sheet, and a Slack channel in a single scenario.
Turn a free Google Form into a real intake pipeline, so submissions are logged, tagged, and acted on automatically. See the free Google Forms automation, no Zapier needed.
Replace manual copy-paste between the tools you already pay for, so nobody moves data by hand all day.

None of these need a developer on staff. They need a clear process and a tool that can run it. Before you commit, it is worth knowing what the same workflow would cost on each platform, which I broke down in how much it costs to automate lead follow-up.

Is Make right for your business?

For a lot of small businesses, yes. Make is an excellent fit when your automations have real branching logic, when you want to actually see the workflow as a diagram, and when you are price-sensitive on multi-step scenarios where Zapier would charge more. If you like the visual approach and your volume is moderate, Make is a genuinely good home.

It is the wrong fit when self-hosting is a requirement or when repeated modules make the credit budget unattractive. In those cases, compare n8n, which offers a self-hosted option and bills Cloud by complete workflow executions. If the workflow is only Forms to Sheets or another connection the vendor already provides, use that native route first. The pricing comparison shows how to calculate the same workflow under each billing model.

Where to learn Make

Make has the best learning resource of the three big tools, and it is their own: Make Academy. It is free, self-paced, runs from Foundation to Advanced, and you earn real Credly badges you can put on LinkedIn. Plan on roughly 15 hours for the full path. If you only do one tool's training properly, make it this one, and build the examples in your own account as you go rather than just watching. That is the difference between having seen it and being able to do it.

Where to start

Pick the most annoying repetitive task in your week and describe it in one sentence: when X happens, do Y, then tell me. Build that single scenario on the free plan and let it run for a week. Keep the first one small; a scenario that reliably saves ten minutes a day teaches you more than an ambitious one that breaks on its first edge case. Once it is running, the next handful of tasks become obvious. If you would rather have the first few built properly, with error handling so they do not fail silently, that is what I do.

Sources

Not sure which tool fits?

Tell me the most repetitive task in your week. I can map a simple workflow for it and tell you honestly whether to build it on Make, Zapier, or n8n, and what it will cost to run.

Get the map

Originally published on FloxoLab.

SE Ranking Review (2026): Pros, Cons, and Verdict

Thu, 22 Oct 2026 15:50:00 +0000

Affiliate disclosure. This review links to SE Ranking here and near the end. If you start a trial or subscribe through either link, I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. The shortcomings below are unchanged.

4.3out of 5

The short verdict

A capable all-in-one SEO tool that fits a small business, freelancer, or small agency well: excellent rank tracking, a strong site audit, useful reporting, and a 14-day trial that is long enough for a real test. It is harder to justify for one small site that only needs Search Console data, and its backlink database is not the deepest option available.

SEO tools sit on a spectrum. At one end are broad enterprise platforms that cover almost every marketing job. At the other are cheap single-purpose trackers. SE Ranking sits in the middle: a genuine all-in-one SEO platform for rank tracking, audits, keyword research, competitor analysis, and reporting. After running it on real work, I think that position is earned, with a couple of real caveats.

What SE Ranking actually does

It is a full SEO suite rather than a single tool, and the parts I use most are the ones it is strongest at.

Rank tracking. This is SE Ranking's heritage and it shows. You can track keywords daily across search engines, locations down to the city, and devices, which is exactly what you need for local work. Positions have been reliable in my use, and the historical view makes trends easy to read.
Website audit. The crawler checks the usual technical and on-page issues, indexing, broken links, titles and meta, Core Web Vitals signals, structured data, and groups them by severity with a clear fix note. It is genuinely useful as the starting point of an audit.
Keyword and competitor research. Search volume, difficulty, and the keywords a competitor ranks for, with enough depth to plan content for a small or mid-size site. The competitor view is good for finding the gaps you can realistically win. My AI keyword research workflow shows how to combine tool data with customer language and business-fit scoring instead of publishing every exported phrase.
Reporting. White-label, scheduled reports you can send to a client or keep for yourself. For a freelancer this alone can pay for the subscription, because it removes hours of manual screenshotting every month.

Is SE Ranking worth paying for?

The subscription earns its place when you use several parts of it every week. Daily rank tracking, recurring audits, competitor research, and scheduled reports can replace a stack of separate tools and hours of manual work. For a freelancer or small agency managing several sites, that is a practical return rather than a theoretical feature list.

It is much harder to justify if you run one small site and only check your own clicks, queries, and indexing. Google Search Console already covers that job for free. Plan limits and prices change, so check the live plans before buying and use the trial to test the workflow you actually need. If your decision is specifically between two platforms, the SE Ranking vs Semrush comparison has the current side-by-side pricing and feature breakdown.

Strengths and weak spots

The balance, side by side: what it does well, and the two places where it gives ground to the giants.

What it does well

Accurate daily rank tracking with granular location and device targeting.
Genuinely useful site audit with prioritized, actionable issues.
Broad all-in-one feature set in a single tool.
White-label, scheduled client reports.
14-day free trial with no card required.

Where it gives ground

Backlink database is smaller than Ahrefs or Semrush, so deep link analysis is weaker.
Not a full marketing suite: less PPC, social, and content-marketing tooling than Semrush.
Some reports can take a moment to build on larger projects.
The breadth means a slight learning curve to find every feature.

The backlink point is the one that matters most. If your work lives and dies on the deepest possible link index, building large-scale link campaigns, doing forensic competitor backlink audits, then Ahrefs or Semrush still lead there, and it is fair to pay them for it. For the rank tracking, auditing, and research that make up the bulk of small-business SEO, SE Ranking's data has been more than enough. Whatever index you use, follow the evidence-led backlink audit workflow instead of treating a vendor toxicity score as Google's decision.

Do you even need a paid tool?

If you run one small site, Google Search Console is free and covers the most important data, your real clicks, impressions, queries, and indexing. A paid tool like SE Ranking earns its place once you are tracking many keywords, watching competitors, auditing larger or multiple sites, or sending reports to clients. If that is not you yet, start free, and come back to this when you outgrow it.

If you want to test research tools before starting a full paid-suite trial, see my hands-on Mangools Free+ test on FloxoLab. It covers all five products and shows where the keyword, SERP, backlink, site, and tracking limits appeared in a real new account.

Who should buy it, and who should not

Buy SE Ranking if you are a small business owner, freelancer, or small agency who wants accurate rank tracking, a solid audit, and keyword and competitor research in one place without enterprise pricing, and you value a longer trial to test before paying. For most of the people I work with in the Philippines and elsewhere, it is the tool that fits the budget and still does the job.

Look elsewhere if your work depends on the single deepest backlink database on the market, or you need a full marketing suite spanning PPC, social, and content at enterprise scale. In that case the extra spend on Ahrefs or Semrush is justified. For a closer look at where a monthly budget actually goes, see what a typical SEO retainer actually does.

The simplest way to decide is to use it. Set up one project, track your real keywords for two weeks, and run a full audit. The trial is long enough to tell you whether it fits, with nothing owed if it does not.

Try SE Ranking free for 14 days →

The bottom line

SE Ranking is the all-in-one SEO tool I reach for when the work is rank tracking, audits, research, and recurring reports rather than enterprise link campaigns. Its strongest case is not a marketing claim or one isolated feature. It is the combination of reliable tracking, a readable audit, practical research, and reporting in one platform. For a small business, freelancer, or small agency that uses those jobs every week, it fits cleanly, and the 14-day trial makes that easy to verify before paying.

Common questions

Is SE Ranking worth it?

It is worth paying for when you actively use daily rank tracking, recurring site audits, competitor research, or scheduled client reports. For one small site that only needs its own search data, Google Search Console may be enough, so use the trial before committing.

Does SE Ranking have a free trial?

Yes. SE Ranking offers a 14-day free trial with no credit card required. That is enough time to set up a project, track keywords for a couple of weeks, and run a full site audit before paying anything.

Who is SE Ranking best for?

Small businesses, freelancers, and small agencies that need accurate rank tracking, a solid site audit, keyword and competitor research, and recurring reports in one platform. A specialist backlink platform or a broader enterprise marketing suite may fit better when those are the main requirements.

Is SE Ranking accurate for rank tracking?

In my use it has been reliable for daily rank tracking across locations and devices, which is the feature SE Ranking is best known for. As with any tool, treat positions as a trend over time rather than a single-day snapshot, and cross-check the keywords that matter against Google Search Console.

Tools find the problems. Fixing them is the work. If you would rather someone run the tools on your site and hand you a prioritized fix list, that is exactly the fixed-price SEO audit: one report, flat $150, no retainer, no ranking promises. See the other tools I use on the SEO tools page, or the wider SEO overview. Get in touch to start.

Sources checked

Originally published on FloxoLab.

Screaming Frog Review (2026): The Technical SEO Crawler I Audit With | FloxoLab

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 15:50:00 +0000

4.6out of 5

The short verdict

The industry-standard desktop crawler for technical SEO, and the best value in its class. It finds the template-level problems other tools miss, the free version covers small sites, and the licence is cheap for what it does. It is single-purpose, runs on your own machine, and has a learning curve, so it is a specialist's tool, not an all-in-one.

Most SEO tools show you a dashboard. Screaming Frog shows you the truth. It is a desktop crawler: you point it at a website and it walks every link the way a search engine would, then hands you a spreadsheet of everything it found, every URL, status code, title, redirect, canonical, and broken link. It is the difference between a tool telling you "your site health is 82" and a tool telling you "these 14 pages return 404, these 6 titles are duplicated, and this canonical points to the wrong URL". For the technical and on-page work I do, that second answer is the one I need.

Once the crawler is installed, use the separate technical SEO audit workflow to reconcile its live URL inventory with Search Console evidence, prioritize the findings, and validate the fixes.

What Screaming Frog actually does

It crawls, and it crawls thoroughly. The things I reach for it for, over and over:

Broken links and redirects. Every 404, every redirect chain, every loop, listed with the page it sits on. This alone is worth the download.
Titles, meta, and headings at scale. Missing, duplicate, too long, or too short, across the whole site at once, which is exactly the template-level problem a dashboard tool hides.
Canonicals, indexability, and directives. What is canonicalised where, what is noindexed, what robots and the meta tags actually say, so you can see why a page is or is not in the index.
Structured data and hreflang. Validates schema and international tags page by page, the kind of detail covered in the technical SEO fixes agencies won't touch.
XML sitemaps and crawl depth. Generate a sitemap, or see how many clicks deep your important pages sit, which affects how Google crawls them.
Integrations and rendering (paid). Pull in Google Analytics, Search Console, and PageSpeed data against each URL, render JavaScript, schedule crawls, and extract anything from the HTML with custom XPath.

Free versus paid: what you actually get

Here is what you actually get for each. Treat the prices as a snapshot from June 2026, and check the live page before buying.

Version	Price	Crawl limit	Advanced features
Free	$0	500 URLs	No
Paid licence	~$279 / £199 / €245 per year	Unlimited	Yes (JS rendering, scheduling, integrations, custom extraction)

The 500-URL free limit is more generous than it sounds. A typical small business site is well under 500 pages, so for a single small site, a spot check, or learning the tool, the free version genuinely does the job and costs nothing. You hit the wall when you crawl larger sites, audit many sites, or need JavaScript rendering and the API integrations. At that point the licence, per user per year, is one of the best-value purchases in SEO. The licence is per person, so a two-person team needs two.

Strengths and weak spots

It earns its 4.6, not a 5. Here is the balance, the strengths alongside the real frustrations.

What it does well

The deepest, most trustworthy technical crawl at this price.
Free version covers small sites with no catch beyond the 500-URL cap.
Finds template-level issues dashboards hide.
Integrations, rendering, and custom extraction on the paid tier.
No subscription lock-in to a web platform; the data is yours, locally.

Where it gives ground

Single-purpose: no rank tracking, no keyword research.
Steep learning curve; the interface is dense and unapologetically technical.
Desktop app: large crawls eat RAM and need memory configuration.
You read and interpret the data yourself; it does not hand you a prioritized plan.

The last point is the one that matters for a non-specialist. Screaming Frog tells you everything, which is exactly the problem if you do not already know what to ignore. It is a scalpel, not a checkup. It will happily show a small business owner ten thousand rows and no sense of which three actually hurt rankings.

Who should use it, and who should not

Use Screaming Frog if you do technical SEO yourself, as a freelancer, agency, in-house SEO, or a developer who wants the real state of a site. The free version is the right first download for a small site; the licence pays for itself fast once you audit regularly.

Look elsewhere if you want rank tracking, keyword research, or reporting, which Screaming Frog does not do; for that, an all-in-one like SE Ranking fits better, and many people run both. If you are choosing between all-in-one platforms, the SE Ranking vs Semrush pricing and feature comparison shows what the higher subscription buys. And if you are a small business owner who just wants the problems found and fixed once, without learning a crawler, buying the tool is the wrong purchase. That is what an audit is for.

The bottom line

Screaming Frog is the technical SEO crawler I trust and the one I run when I audit a site, this one included. For specialists it is close to essential, and cheap for what it does. For a small business owner it is a powerful free spot-check on a small site, and a poor purchase if you are not going to live in the data. Know which of those you are, and the decision is easy.

Common questions

Is Screaming Frog free?

Yes, with a limit. The free version of the Screaming Frog SEO Spider crawls up to 500 URLs, which is enough for a small site or a quick spot check. To crawl more than 500 URLs and unlock advanced features like JavaScript rendering, scheduling, and API integrations, you need the paid licence.

How much does Screaming Frog cost?

The paid licence is GBP 199, USD 279, or EUR 245 per year, per user, at the time of writing. The licence is annual and per person, so two people need two licences, with small discounts on bulk purchases of five or more.

Is Screaming Frog worth it for a small business?

For most small business owners, the free 500-URL version is enough for an occasional check, and you do not need the paid licence. The licence is worth it for anyone auditing sites regularly: freelancers, agencies, and in-house SEOs who crawl larger sites or need rendering and integrations. If you just want the problems found and fixed once, hiring an audit is often cheaper than buying and learning the tool.

What is the difference between Screaming Frog and SE Ranking?

They solve different problems. Screaming Frog is a deep technical crawler that inspects every URL on a site, but it does not track rankings or research keywords. SE Ranking is an all-in-one suite for rank tracking, keyword research, and reporting, with a lighter built-in audit. Many people use both: Screaming Frog for the deep technical crawl and an all-in-one tool for tracking and research.

The tool finds the issues. Knowing which ones matter, and fixing them, is the job. That is exactly the fixed-price SEO audit: I run Screaming Frog and the rest on your site and hand back a prioritized fix list, one report at a flat $150, no retainer. See the other tools I use on the SEO tools page, including the free ones in the free SEO tools roundup. Get in touch to start.

Sources checked

Originally published on FloxoLab.