Coder Legion - Recent posts tagged credit

Apollo Free Trial: What You Can Test Before Paying

Sat, 05 Sep 2026 15:50:00 +0000

Direct answer: create an Apollo Free account first and do not activate the one-time 14-day paid-plan trial until your test segment is ready. Use Free to define the market and filters. During the trial, inspect 25 companies, verify 10 contacts, reveal only the data you need, test one sequence with your own inbox, and measure credit use. Upgrade only if the sample is good enough and a paid feature removes a real constraint. Otherwise, let the workspace return to Free.

Partner disclosure. This guide includes a partner link to Apollo. If you create an account or purchase through it, I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

This guide has one narrow job: evaluate Apollo before paying. It does not replace the B2B prospect list guide, which covers ICP, company filters, buyer roles, and exclusions. If you have not chosen the research system yet, use the Apollo vs LinkedIn Sales Navigator comparison first. Use the separate Apollo pricing guide for the current plan table, credit costs, add-ons, and small-team scenarios. Here, the outcome is a written pass, upgrade, or revert decision based on one representative segment.

Apollo Free account and free trial are not the same thing

Current fact	What it means for your test
Free account	A persistent $0 workspace for preparing filters and trying limited prospecting tools. You can keep it after the trial.
Paid-plan trial	An eligible Free account can start one 14-day trial of Basic or Professional. Custom plans do not have a self-serve trial.
No credit card required	You can evaluate the trial without entering a card. At the end, upgrade or return to Free.
Trial credit allowance	Apollo's public pricing FAQ currently says 50 credits plus 5 mobile credits. Check the confirmation screen because Apollo is rolling out a new credit system.
Bulk action limit	You can select up to 25 records at once for a bulk save or action during the trial.
Phone and calling limits	The trial documentation lists up to 20 phone-number accesses, 60 total calling minutes, and 10 minutes per call.

Checked in a live Free workspace on August 11, 2026: the account showed a $0 Free plan, 75 monthly credits, two sequences, and five AI Assistant chats. The same workspace had already used its Professional trial. Your allowance can differ during Apollo's credit-system rollout, so the numbers inside your own Billing screen are binding.

If you upgrade during the trial, Apollo says the trial ends immediately and unused trial days or credits do not carry over. You can switch between Basic and Professional during the original 14-day window, but the clock does not reset. Do the useful testing before you buy.

Prepare a small test pack before starting the clock

The trial becomes valuable when you know what a good result looks like. Pick one market, one offer, and one buying role. A broad search across several industries will make the database look busy, but it will not tell you whether Apollo can support your actual outreach process.

Write the segment. Define geography, industry, company size, buyer role, and at least three exclusions.
Choose 25 companies. This fits the trial's bulk-selection ceiling and is large enough to expose weak filters.
Choose 10 contacts. Verify their current role and company manually before spending more credits.
Name required fields. Decide whether you truly need work email, phone, LinkedIn URL, company website, headcount, or technology data.
Set pass criteria. For example, require at least 20 of 25 companies to fit and 8 of 10 sampled contacts to hold the expected role. These are evaluation thresholds, not Apollo accuracy claims.
Prepare one safe message. Use your own or a controlled test inbox first. Do not make live cold sends the first sequence test.

A practical 14-day Apollo trial schedule

Days	Test	Evidence to keep
Before trial	Build the segment, exclusions, sample sheet, and pass criteria on Free.	One ready 25-company test pack.
1-2	Rebuild the search and test filters that matter to your market.	Saved search plus notes on false positives and missing companies.
3-5	Inspect 25 companies and 10 contacts against public company pages and professional profiles.	Fit, role, stale-data, and uncertain-data labels.
6-7	Reveal only the email or phone data needed for the sample and review credit history.	Credits before and after each action.
8-10	Build one sequence and send it only to a test inbox or controlled recipient.	Merge fields, timing, stop rules, unsubscribe path, and reply behavior.
11-12	Test AI Assistant or the dialer only if either feature affects the buying decision.	Time saved, credit use, errors, and required manual review.
13-14	Score the result, document the required plan, and upgrade or revert.	A written decision with no unused trial work left behind.

Test one: can Apollo isolate the right market?

Start with company filters, then add people filters. Review the first 25 companies one by one. A company passes only when it matches the real market, not merely because Apollo assigned a nearby industry label. Record why every false positive entered the list, then tighten one filter at a time.

Confirm the company still operates, serves the target geography, and fits the intended size range.
Check whether subsidiaries, agencies, recruiters, consultants, or competitors should be excluded.
Review job titles for function and seniority. Similar titles can represent very different buying authority.
Save the clean search only after the sample meets the written company-fit threshold.

Pass: the search repeatedly produces companies and roles that a human reviewer would accept. Fail: the apparent list size collapses after manual checks or depends on exclusions you cannot express consistently.

Test two: measure contact quality and credit use together

Apollo's terms explicitly say its data may contain errors, duplicates, and omissions. Treat a reveal as a candidate record, not a guarantee. For 10 contacts, verify current employer and role from a public company page or professional profile. Mark records as confirmed, stale, conflicting, or uncertain.

Before revealing anything, open Settings > Billing > Credit usage & AI > History. Record the starting balance, reveal the smallest useful sample, then inspect the history again. Apollo's current system can charge different actions for email, phone, enrichment, connected calls, AI research, exports, and other features. The confirmation shown before an action and the resulting history are more reliable than an old blog post or remembered price table.

Do not spend the trial proving volume. Ten carefully checked contacts reveal more about fit than hundreds of unreviewed records. Spend mobile credits only when phone data is part of the real workflow.

Test three: build one sequence without risking your domain

Create one short sequence for the chosen segment. Add a few controlled records that you own, review every merge field, and send to a test inbox. You are evaluating the workflow, not trying to prove that a 14-day blast can generate revenue.

Check the sender name, reply-to address, timezone, daily schedule, and delay between steps.
Preview records with missing company names, first names, or custom fields.
Confirm what happens after a reply, bounce, unsubscribe, manual removal, or booked meeting.
Keep the first live volume low and monitor the sending mailbox outside Apollo as well.
Verify any mailbox-provider restriction shown in your workspace before connecting an important domain.

Apollo can organize sequencing, but it cannot guarantee inbox placement, replies, meetings, or revenue. Your list quality, sender reputation, message relevance, consent basis, and local marketing rules still matter. Apollo's terms place responsibility for lawful use and verification on the customer.

Test AI Assistant only when it saves a real step

Apollo's current documentation gives Free accounts five AI Assistant chats per billing cycle and up to 10 messages in each chat. Paid access currently offers more generous use. Chatting does not automatically consume credits, and Apollo asks for confirmation before a credit-consuming action. Still, verify every output and avoid entering sensitive information.

A useful test is narrow: ask the assistant to create or refine the saved search for your written segment, then compare the result with your manual filter setup. Record whether it saved time and whether you had to correct industries, titles, exclusions, or geography. Do not upgrade because the assistant produced fluent text. Upgrade only if it reduces repeatable research work without weakening control.

If calling matters, verify dialer access before choosing a trial

Apollo's dedicated trial help page says the dialer is available only in the Professional trial. The current in-account Basic plan card we checked listed a US dialer. Because these official surfaces conflict, do not assume either is universal. Review the exact trial confirmation screen or ask Apollo support before activation if calling is part of the purchase decision.

If dialer access appears, test it with your own or an explicitly consenting recipient first. Confirm number setup, recording settings, call outcome logging, and credit use. The trial documentation lists 60 total minutes and a 10-minute limit per call, which is enough for workflow evaluation but not a calling campaign.

What the Apollo trial cannot prove

That every email, phone number, company attribute, or job title is current and accurate.
That messages will reach the inbox or that a mailbox will preserve its sender reputation.
That a segment will produce replies, meetings, pipeline, or revenue at scale.
That having access to contact data gives you permission to use it in every jurisdiction.
That the credit allowance or feature limits in your trial will remain unchanged later.

The trial can prove something narrower and still valuable: whether Apollo finds enough plausible records for one market, whether your team can verify and organize them efficiently, whether the credit economics are visible, and whether the paid workflow is meaningfully better than staying on Free.

Choose Basic or Professional by the feature you must prove

Start with Basic when the decision is mainly about search, saved lists, enrichment, and simple sequences. Choose Professional only when a Professional-level workflow is genuinely part of the buying decision, such as advanced sequencing, reporting, team controls, or the dialer access confirmed for your workspace. Do not select the larger trial merely to explore more menus.

Avoid activating either trial until you can name the decisive feature in one sentence. If the Free account already supports the recurring work and the paid feature does not save enough time or improve control, returning to Free is the correct outcome.

Use this upgrade-or-revert scorecard

Question	Upgrade signal	Revert signal
Did targeting pass?	The 25-company sample met the written fit threshold.	Manual review removed too much of the list.
Was contact data useful?	The verified sample supported the intended channel.	Too many records were stale, conflicting, or missing.
Were credits predictable?	The team can estimate monthly use from actual history.	Required actions consume credits too quickly or unclearly.
Did the sequence work safely?	Fields, timing, replies, and stop rules behaved as expected.	The process still needs constant manual correction.
Did a paid feature matter?	It removed a measured bottleneck in the real process.	The Free account already covers the useful work.

What not to do during the trial

Do not activate before the segment, sample, and acceptance criteria are ready.
Do not reveal every available field when the workflow only needs one channel.
Do not treat database access as proof of accuracy or legal permission.
Do not test deliverability by sending a large cold campaign from a valuable domain.
Do not upgrade early. Apollo says that immediately ends the trial.
Do not judge Apollo by record count alone. Judge the verified fit and usable workflow.

Sources checked

Trial rules, credit behavior, AI limits, sequence controls, and legal boundaries were checked on August 11, 2026. Apollo can change plans, allowances, and product behavior.

Apollo partner link

Test one qualified segment

Apollo Pricing: Plans, Credits, and Real Small-Team Cost

Sat, 29 Aug 2026 15:50:00 +0000

Direct answer: choose an Apollo plan by the paid action you must prove, not by the longest feature list. Free can be enough to define a market and inspect the interface. Basic adds a much larger recurring credit allowance and several plan-gated targeting and enrichment options. Professional becomes relevant when a team needs larger calling, reporting, testing, or workflow limits. Organization starts with a multi-seat annual commitment. The real monthly cost is seats plus consumed data actions, add-ons, any missing verification or sending tools, and the time spent rejecting stale or irrelevant records.

Partner disclosure. This guide includes a partner link to Apollo. If you create an account or purchase through it, I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

This page has one job: explain Apollo pricing for a solo operator or small B2B team. It does not replace the free-account and trial checklist, teach a complete CSV enrichment workflow, or provide a full product review. Prices, credits, and limits below were checked on August 27, 2026 and may change.

Apollo plan prices and included credits

Plan	Monthly billing screen	Annual billing screen	Credits shown	Small-team boundary
Free	US$0	US$0	75 per seat per month	Start the ICP and interface test. Confirm enrichment access in the actual workspace.
Basic	US$65 per seat per month	US$49 per seat per month, US$588 billed yearly	2,500 per month or 30,000 per year upfront	Larger credit allowance, advanced filters, and more enrichment options.
Professional	US$99 per seat per month	US$79 per seat per month, US$948 billed yearly	4,000 per month or 48,000 per year upfront	Higher workflow, calling, reporting, and testing allowances.
Organization	US$149 monthly equivalent, annual commitment	US$119 per seat per month, minimum three seats	6,000 per month or 72,000 per year upfront	Enterprise controls, larger limits, and a multi-seat commitment.

The annual prices and credit grants match Apollo's official pricing page. Monthly prices, add-on quotes, and plan details were also captured from the FloxoLab account on August 26, 2026. Taxes, promotions, workspace configuration, and rollout differences can change the checkout.

Annual billing snapshot captured on August 26, 2026: Basic US$49, Professional US$79, and Organization US$119 per seat per month, billed annually. Organization showed a three-seat minimum.

Monthly billing snapshot from the same account: Basic US$65 and Professional US$99 per seat per month. Organization still displayed annual billing only at US$149 per seat per month.

Trial-credit conflict: Apollo's public pricing FAQ currently says a trial includes 50 credits plus 5 mobile credits. A separate Apollo Help article says 100 free credits. The Professional trial activated in the FloxoLab account displayed 75 credits. Do not use a trial allowance to estimate normal paid capacity. Record the exact confirmation and Plan Overview screens for your workspace.

What the long feature list actually buys

The comparison screen groups many different jobs under one subscription. A checkmark only proves that a plan matrix listed the feature. It does not prove that the workflow is useful, available in every workspace, or free of additional credit and add-on costs.

Feature label	What it does	Why a small team may care
Contact & Account Data	Provides person and company records that other Apollo workflows use.	Useful as a discovery layer, but the records still need identity, role, recency, and relevance checks.
Waterfall Enrichment	Can try Apollo and external data sources in sequence when a requested field is missing.	May improve coverage, but the source path and variable credit cost must be recorded before scaling.
CSV, CRM & API Enrichment	Enriches an uploaded file, connected CRM, or custom application through different entry points.	Choose the route where the record already lives. More integration is not automatically better data.
Intent Topics & Filters	Lets the operator filter or prioritize accounts by selected intent topics.	Treat it as timing evidence for research, not proof that a company is ready to buy.
Domain & Mailbox Purchasing	Adds sending infrastructure inside the Apollo workflow.	The matrix showed separate credit costs, so these are not simply included because sequences are available.
Website Visitors and Form Enrichment	Identifies eligible site visitors and enriches inbound form records.	Relevant only when the site has enough qualified traffic and a privacy-reviewed follow-up process.
Inbound Routers and Meetings	Routes inbound records and schedules meetings under configured rules.	Useful after ownership, qualification, calendars, and fallback handling are defined.

The plan matrix separates basic filters from advanced filters and signals. It also showed one intent topic on Free, six on Basic and Professional, and twelve on Organization.

The data-enrichment category lists several entry points. This screenshot records the comparison claims, not a successful hands-on enrichment run.

Domain, mailbox, dialer, workflow, and meeting rows expose costs and limits that are easy to miss when comparing only seat prices.

Inbound and Advanced Dialer are separate US$149 team add-ons

The current checkout displayed Inbound and Advanced Dialer at US$149 per team per month each. The Inbound trial card showed visitor, domain tracking, form enrichment, form builder, and US contact identification limits. That full add-on allowance should not be confused with a smaller base-plan allowance that may appear elsewhere in the account.

Account checkout on August 26, 2026. Inbound was active as a fourteen-day trial; both add-ons were quoted at US$149 per team per month.

Free is a preparation plan, not a complete cost test

Free is useful when the team still needs to define its ICP, exclusions, role set, and required fields. It can also reveal whether the interface and basic search route make sense. It cannot prove a paid feature that the account does not expose. In the checked workspace, opening Data enrichment redirected to the upgrade screen because CSV enrichment was not included on Free.

Stay on Free while any of these are unresolved:

the target market is still described as everyone who might buy;
no one can name the required contact and company fields;
the team has no duplicate, suppression, or manual-review rule;
the paid feature has no pass or fail criterion;
the operator cannot estimate how many accepted records are needed per month.

Credits turn usage into the variable cost

The checked account screen separated several actions instead of presenting one universal credit price. That makes a record count alone misleading.

Apollo's account explanation shows why a credit is not a universal lead unit. Different actions consume different amounts.

Action shown	Draft credit rate	Cost-control question
Verified email	1 credit	How many net-new verified emails are actually required?
Phone number	8 credits	Does the sales process use calling enough to justify the higher rate?
Enrich data	1 to 8 credits	Which fields and data sources are selected, and what will a usable result cost?
AI Research	1 credit per run	Which decision improves because this research was run?
US Dialer	1 credit per 30 seconds	What connected-call volume belongs in the monthly estimate?

Do not multiply the plan allowance by one favorite rate and call that the number of leads. A workflow may use several credit categories on the same accepted record. It may also spend credits on a record that later fails the role, company, geography, or legal-use check.

Observed add-on credit prices

The active Professional checkout allowed the team to add shared monthly credits on top of the included 4,000. The following slider positions were captured on August 26, 2026. They are account evidence, not a promise that every region, plan, or future checkout will show the same quote.

Extra credits per month	Displayed monthly price	Displayed price per extra credit
400	US$10	US$0.025
1,000	US$25	US$0.025
2,500	US$50	US$0.020
10,000	US$180	US$0.018
250,000	US$3,750	US$0.015

One captured slider state: 10,000 extra shared credits for US$180 per month on top of the current plan allowance.

Apollo's plan-management documentation confirms that add-on credits are recurring, take effect immediately, are not prorated, and expire at the end of the billing cycle. Buying midway through a cycle can therefore make the effective cost higher than the slider alone suggests.

Calculate cost per usable record, not cost per reveal

Use a small worksheet before choosing a tier:

Set the number of active seats, not the number of people who might log in someday.
Estimate monthly candidate records for one target segment.
Split required actions into email, phone, enrichment, AI research, export, and dialer categories.
Apply the current account-specific credit rates and included allowances.
Estimate the percentage that will pass company, role, recency, and manual-verification checks.
Add every external tool and the operator time required to finish the workflow.

Working formula: real monthly cost = Apollo seats + add-on credits + required external tools + review labor. Cost per usable record = real monthly cost divided by the records that pass the complete acceptance check.

Three small-team cost scenarios

These examples use the checked monthly prices and credit rates. They are planning models, not recommended volumes. Taxes, external tools, and labor are shown separately because they vary by team.

Scenario	Credit actions	Apollo software cost	Usable-record check
Free preparation	40 verified emails = 40 credits	US$0	If 20 records pass review, software cost is US$0 per usable record. Research labor still counts.
Solo Basic test	300 emails + 25 phones + 100 AI runs = 600 credits	US$65 monthly seat, within the displayed 2,500-credit allowance	At 75 usable records, seat cost is about US$0.87 each before labor and other tools.
Basic with extra capacity	Up to 5,000 available credits after adding 2,500 to the displayed plan allowance	US$65 seat + observed US$50 add-on = US$115	At 250 usable records, platform cost is US$0.46 each before labor, tax, and required infrastructure.

The lowest unit price is not automatically the best purchase. A larger allowance saves money only when the team can use it before expiry and the additional records still pass company, role, recency, suppression, and lawful-use checks.

Compare Apollo with the separate stack it may replace

Apollo can combine several jobs, but a combined platform is cheaper only when the team uses those jobs and the output fits its market. Compare the complete workflow:

company and people discovery;
business email and phone finding;
verification and enrichment;
CSV or CRM handoff;
sequence and task execution;
mailbox, domain, deliverability, and suppression operations;
manual research and quality control.

Do not insert competitor prices until they are checked on the same date, currency, billing period, and usage assumption. The comparison should show which jobs disappear, which remain, and where another tool is still required.

Choose the tier by the first hard requirement

Situation	Likely starting route	Evidence required before paying
Solo operator def