What are BFS and DFS for Binary Tree?
A Tree is typically traversed in two ways:
- Breadth First Traversal (Or Level Order Traversal)
- Depth First Traversals
- Inorder Traversal (Left-Root-Right)
- Preorder Traversal (Root-Left-Right)
- Postorder Traversal (Left-Right-Root)

BFS and DFSs of above Tree
Breadth First Traversal : 1 2 3 4 5
Depth First Traversals:
Preorder Traversal : 1 2 4 5 3
Inorder Traversal : 4 2 5 1 3
Postorder Traversal : 4 5 2 3 1
Why do we care?
There are many tree questions that can be solved using any of the above four traversals. Examples of such questions are size, maximum, minimum, print left view, etc.
Is there any difference in terms of Time Complexity?
All four traversals require O(n) time as they visit every node exactly once.
Is there any difference in terms of Extra Space?
There is difference in terms of extra space required.
- Extra Space required for Level Order Traversal is O(w) where w is maximum width of Binary Tree. In level order traversal, queue one by one stores nodes of different level.
- Extra Space required for Depth First Traversals is O(h) where h is maximum height of Binary Tree. In Depth First Traversals, stack (or function call stack) stores all ancestors of a node.
Maximum Width of a Binary Tree at depth (or height) h can be 2h where h starts from 0. So the maximum number of nodes can be at the last level. And worst case occurs when Binary Tree is a perfect Binary Tree with numbers of nodes like 1, 3, 7, 15, …etc. In worst case, value of 2h is Ceil(n/2).
Height for a Balanced Binary Tree is O(Log n). Worst case occurs for skewed tree and worst case height becomes O(n).
So in worst case extra space required is O(n) for both. But worst cases occur for different types of trees.
It is evident from above points that extra space required for Level order traversal is likely to be more when tree is more balanced and extra space for Depth First Traversal is likely to be more when tree is less balanced.
How to Pick One?
- Extra Space can be one factor (Explained above)
- Depth First Traversals are typically recursive and recursive code requires function call overheads.
- The most important points is, BFS starts visiting nodes from root while DFS starts visiting nodes from leaves. So if our problem is to search something that is more likely to closer to root, we would prefer BFS. And if the target node is close to a leaf, we would prefer DFS.
Exercise:
Which traversal should be used to print leaves of Binary Tree and why?
Which traversal should be used to print nodes at k’th level where k is much less than total number of levels?
This article is contributed by Dheeraj Gupta. This Please write comments if you find anything incorrect, or you want to share more information about the topic discussed above
Attention reader! Don’t stop learning now. Get hold of all the important DSA concepts with the DSA Self Paced Course at a student-friendly price and become industry ready.
Recommended Posts:
- Difference between BFS and DFS
- Diameter of n-ary tree using BFS
- Level of Each node in a Tree from source node (using BFS)
- Count the number of nodes at given level in a tree using BFS.
- Check if the given permutation is a valid BFS of a given Tree
- 0-1 BFS (Shortest Path in a Binary Weight Graph)
- Diameter of a tree using DFS
- DFS for a n-ary tree (acyclic graph) represented as adjacency list
- DFS traversal of a tree using recursion
- Subtree of all nodes in a tree using DFS
- Tree, Back, Edge and Cross Edges in DFS of Graph
- Level with maximum number of nodes using DFS in a N-ary tree
- Count the number of nodes at a given level in a tree using DFS
- Find the Kth node in the DFS traversal of a given subtree in a Tree
- Print all leaf nodes of an n-ary tree using DFS
- Construct the Rooted tree by using start and finish time of its DFS traversal
- Kth ancestor of all nodes in an N-ary tree using DFS
- Queries for DFS of a subtree in a tree
- Complexity of different operations in Binary tree, Binary Search Tree and AVL tree
- Breadth First Search or BFS for a Graph

Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
