Tesla’s October 15 reveal of the next-generation Roadster leaned on two pieces of hardware that auto racing and spaceflight engineers both tried and, in one case, quietly shelved decades ago. The car drove upside down on an inverted ramp using a suction system, turned in midair, and landed with the help of built-in thrusters, according to outlets including MotorTrend and TechRadar. Tech-Insider has already detailed how the suction demo echoes the banned 1978 Formula 1 fan car, but that comparison skips over an earlier, more extreme version of the same trick that raced — and got outlawed — eight years before Formula 1 ever saw a fan car.
The fuller picture of the Roadster’s “50-year-old stunt technology,” as several outlets have framed it, actually spans two separate engineering lineages: a vacuum-sealed racing underbody that traces to 1970, and a reaction-control thruster design that traces to the earliest years of American crewed spaceflight. Both were developed for entirely different reasons, both were eventually restricted by the sport or agency that first allowed them, and both just resurfaced — bolted to a two-seat electric sports car — a day before this article was published.
Don't miss new tech stories on Google
Add Tech Insider once in the Google app and our stories appear in your news suggestions.
What Tesla Actually Showed on October 15
Tesla’s demonstration, developed in collaboration with Elon Musk’s rocket company SpaceX, showed the new Roadster driving upside down on an inverted ramp, turning while inverted, and landing using thrusters built into the body, a sequence confirmed by multiple outlets covering the event. Tesla has described the propulsion hardware as cold-gas thrusters — a system that uses high-pressure gas rather than combustion, paired with all-electric actuators that Tesla says allow “micro adjustments within a fraction of a second,” according to reporting cited by TechRadar and MotorTrend. Musk told the crowd the next-generation Roadster is now targeted for production in 2028, a date CNBC noted comes after years of slipped timelines for the car.
Reservations opened at a $50,000 deposit in the United States, Canada and China, CNBC reported, while the final retail price for the Roadster itself remains unannounced. Tesla’s own demonstration timer showed a zero-to-60-mph run of under one second, though Tesla has not published a certified or independently verified performance spec sheet alongside that figure. Numbers that have circulated elsewhere online — a 230-plus-mph top speed, an 80-kilonewton thrust figure, a named “A71” system, or a $245,000 “Thrust” package — have not been confirmed by Tesla and should be treated as unverified claims rather than specifications, a distinction several outlets have been careful to flag.
The Suction Trick’s Real Origin: Jim Hall’s 1970 Chaparral 2J
The technology underneath Tesla’s upside-down stunt is a sealed-underbody suction system, and its closest historical ancestor isn’t the 1978 Formula 1 car most coverage has pointed to. It’s the Chaparral 2J, a Can-Am sports racer built by Texas engineer and team owner Jim Hall for the 1970 season. The 2J carried two auxiliary two-stroke engines — borrowed from snowmobile design — that spun a pair of rear-mounted fans at a near-constant speed. Those fans pulled air out from underneath the car’s underbody, while flexible skirts made of Lexan sealed the sides and front of the chassis against the ground.
The effect was a partial vacuum that generated substantial downforce even when the car was moving slowly — something conventional aerodynamic wings couldn’t do at low speed. Chaparral’s own paperwork described the fan system as serving a cooling function first, but the decisive competitive benefit was the suction itself, motorsport historians have noted. It’s a strikingly similar engineering concept to what Tesla demonstrated this week: use mechanically generated suction, rather than aerodynamic shape alone, to stick a vehicle to a surface it otherwise couldn’t grip.
Why the SCCA Pulled the Plug on the “Sucker Car”
The Chaparral 2J, nicknamed the “sucker car” by rivals, competed through the 1970 Can-Am season but never raced again after it. Competing teams argued that the continuously spinning fans and ground-sealing skirts amounted to a movable aerodynamic device — exactly the category of hardware most racing series try to keep out, because it lets a team buy performance that has nothing to do with driver skill or engine power. The Sports Car Club of America responded by changing the Can-Am rulebook for the 1971 season in a way that made the 2J’s concept ineligible, effectively ending the car’s career after a single year on track.
That single detail matters for how the Tesla story gets told: the 2J wasn’t thrown out mid-race or disqualified from a win. It simply never got a second season once the rules caught up with it. The same regulatory instinct — let a radical idea race once, then write a rule that keeps it from racing again — would repeat itself eight years later, in a very different motorsport, with a very similar piece of hardware.
Brabham’s 1978 Fan Car Took the Same Idea to Formula 1
The Brabham BT46B, designed by Gordon Murray and driven by Niki Lauda, is the car Tech-Insider’s earlier Roadster coverage compared Tesla’s suction demo to, and it remains the better-known half of this story because it won on its only outing: the 1978 Swedish Grand Prix at Anderstorp. Brabham argued the BT46B’s large rear fan existed primarily to cool the car’s Alfa Romeo engine, with the underbody suction it also created described as a side effect — a framing that let the car pass Formula 1’s existing ban on movable aerodynamic devices. Lauda won the race by more than 30 seconds.
Unlike the Chaparral 2J, the BT46B was never formally disqualified or banned outright. Brabham team principal Bernie Ecclestone voluntarily withdrew the car after the race amid protests from rival teams, and fan-car designs were subsequently written out of Formula 1’s rules — which is why it’s commonly, if imprecisely, remembered as “the car that won and got banned.” Either way, the practical outcome matched the Chaparral’s fate: one race, one dominant result, and a rulebook that made sure it never happened again.
Two Bans, One Lesson for Automakers
Put the two cars side by side and a pattern appears: when motorsport regulators have been confronted with mechanically generated ground suction, they’ve consistently decided it changes the sport too much to allow, regardless of whether it’s packaged as a cooling device or an aero device. Tesla isn’t racing the Roadster in a sanctioned series, so no governing body gets a vote on whether its suction system is legal. That’s precisely what makes it possible for Tesla to revive a 56-year-old and a 48-year-old banned concept in the same car — there’s no SCCA or FIA rulebook standing in the way of a manufacturer demo.
It also explains why the comparison resonates with longtime motorsport fans in a way a purely futuristic pitch wouldn’t: the underlying physics isn’t new or unproven, it’s technology that was good enough to win races outright before anyone decided it needed to be restricted.
The Other Half of the Demo: Cold-Gas Thrusters From the Space Race
The suction system only explains how the Roadster stuck to the inverted ramp. Landing back on its wheels relied on a second, older technology: cold-gas reaction-control thrusters, the same basic principle NASA used for attitude control on the Mercury and Gemini programs in the 1960s. A cold-gas thruster stores gas under high pressure and releases it through a nozzle; the expanding gas produces thrust through momentum exchange alone, with no combustion or ignition involved. That makes the system mechanically simple and highly controllable, though it produces less thrust per unit of stored propellant than a combustion-based engine.
This isn’t the first time Musk has described this exact pairing. Business Insider reported this week that Musk previewed the concept of a SpaceX-derived thruster package for the Roadster roughly eight years ago, describing a system that would use “ultra high pressure air in a composite over-wrapped pressure vessel in place of the 2 rear seats,” and telling a questioner at the time that “the new Roadster will actually do something like this.” Eight years later, Tesla followed through — a detail that several outlets have used to argue the thruster feature, at least conceptually, is one of the least surprising parts of this week’s reveal.
From Dragon Capsules to a Two-Seat Roadster
SpaceX’s involvement is what moves the thruster story from motorsport trivia to genuine cross-industry engineering transfer. Reaction-control thrusters are standard hardware on modern crewed spacecraft, used for fine attitude adjustments and docking maneuvers rather than primary propulsion. Musk, discussing the Roadster package this week, said the SpaceX option would include “~10 small rocket thrusters arranged seamlessly around” the car, according to Yahoo News UK, and argued that “these rocket engines dramatically improve acceleration, top speed, braking & cornering.” Tesla has not published an official count or thrust rating to independently confirm that figure, so it should be read as Musk’s own characterization rather than a verified specification.
Musk framed the broader collaboration simply: “the results are the collaboration of the world’s best car company and the world’s best rocket company,” he said, as quoted by TechRadar. Whether that framing holds up once the Roadster reaches production in 2028 is a separate question from whether the underlying thruster technology is real — cold-gas attitude control has been flying on spacecraft for roughly six decades, which is a longer track record than almost anything else on the demo stage this week.
Suction and Fan-Car Systems Across Racing History
| Vehicle | Year | Mechanism | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chaparral 2J (“sucker car”) | 1970 | Two auxiliary two-stroke engines driving rear fans; Lexan ground-sealing skirts | Competed one Can-Am season; ruled ineligible by SCCA rule change for 1971 |
| Brabham BT46B (“fan car”) | 1978 | Single large rear fan pulling air from underbody; sealed skirts | Won its only Formula 1 race, the 1978 Swedish Grand Prix; voluntarily withdrawn by Brabham after protests |
| Tesla Roadster suction demo | 2026 | Suction system used to drive upside down on an inverted ramp | Demonstrated at Tesla’s October 15 unveiling; not used on a public road or in competition |
Cold-Gas Thruster Systems Across Six Decades
| Program/Vehicle | Era | Primary Use | Combustion? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury program | Early 1960s | Spacecraft attitude control | No — stored high-pressure gas |
| Gemini program | Mid-1960s | Attitude control and maneuvering | No — stored high-pressure gas |
| Modern crewed spacecraft (general) | 2010s-2020s | Fine attitude adjustment, docking | Varies by system; cold-gas principle persists for simple attitude thrusters |
| Tesla Roadster (SpaceX package) | 2026 demo, 2028 targeted production | Mid-air orientation and landing assist in demo | No, per Tesla’s description of the system — high-pressure gas, all-electric actuators |
What’s Confirmed, What’s Still a Claim
Separating Tesla’s own demonstrated facts from numbers circulating around the internet matters here, because the two historical comparisons above are well documented while several of the Roadster’s own specs are not. A quick reference, based on current reporting:
CONFIRMED (per Tesla's Oct. 15 demo and outlet reporting):
- Upside-down drive on inverted ramp via suction system
- Midair turn and thruster-assisted landing
- Cold-gas thrusters, high-pressure gas, no combustion
- All-electric actuators for rapid micro-adjustments
- $50,000 reservation deposit (US, Canada, China)
- Target production year: 2028
UNCONFIRMED / UNVERIFIED CLAIMS circulating online:
- 230+ mph top speed
- 0-60 mph in under 0.59 seconds (independently verified)
- 80 kN thrust figure
- "A71" system name
- $245,000 "Thrust" package price
- Final retail price of the RoadsterTesla’s own demonstration timer did show a sub-one-second zero-to-60 run, which is a real, witnessed data point — it’s the more specific derivative figures layered on top of that demo, several outlets note, that haven’t been independently confirmed.
Competitive Landscape: Rimac, Lotus and the Hypercar Field
None of Tesla’s hypercar-tier rivals currently market suction-based grip or thruster-assisted handling, which is part of why the Roadster reveal generated as much attention as it did. Tech-Insider’s prior coverage of Roadster pricing against the Rimac Nevera covers how the segment’s existing benchmark relies entirely on battery and motor output rather than any aerodynamic or propulsion trickery. Lotus, whose Evija sits in a similar performance bracket, likewise competes on raw powertrain specifications rather than any suction or thruster hardware.
That makes the Roadster’s positioning unusual: it isn’t just trying to out-accelerate the fastest EVs on the road, it’s trying to demonstrate a category of maneuver — driving upside down, landing on thrusters — that no production car on sale today claims to do at all. Whether that translates into sales once reservations convert to deliveries around 2028 is a separate question from whether the demonstration itself worked as a piece of engineering theater.
Market Impact: Why Tesla Needed a Spectacle Right Now
The Roadster has slipped its production timeline multiple times since Tesla first unveiled a concept version in 2017, and CNBC’s recap of the reveal frames this week’s event explicitly around that delay history. A demonstration built around technology this unusual — rather than, say, a straightforward spec-sheet update — gives Tesla a news cycle that isn’t primarily about how late the car is. Tech-Insider’s coverage of the Roadster against eVTOL rivals noted a similar dynamic: spectacle generates headlines in a way that a conventional performance announcement, at this point in the car’s history, likely would not.
There’s also a reservations angle. A $50,000 deposit, confirmed by CNBC, is a meaningful commitment even for a hypercar buyer, and pairing that ask with a visually dramatic demo — rather than a conventional stage reveal — is a way to justify the deposit size before any independently verified performance numbers exist.
Historical Pattern: Why Banned Tech Keeps Resurfacing in New Industries
The Chaparral 2J and Brabham BT46B were both banned, in practice, for the same underlying reason: they worked too well within the specific competitive context they were built for. That’s a regulatory problem, not an engineering one, and it’s why the same physics can resurface decades later outside the context that restricted it. Cold-gas thrusters followed a different path — they were never banned anywhere, they simply fell out of mainstream public attention once combustion-based propulsion and electric actuation became the default framing for “advanced” vehicle technology.
Tech-Insider’s look at the Roadster’s flip-test ramp hardware covers the physical rig Tesla built to stage the stunt itself, which is a useful reminder that a lot of what made this week’s demo possible is purpose-built test infrastructure rather than something a Roadster owner could replicate on a public road — a point evo has been explicit about in its coverage.
What Comes Next: Five Predictions for the Roadster Program
- Tesla will likely publish a more detailed thruster specification sheet before reservations convert to binding orders, if only to manage expectations set by Musk’s own public remarks.
- Expect motorsport historians and journalists to keep invoking the Chaparral 2J and Brabham BT46B comparisons as shorthand for the suction demo, since both are well-documented, uncontroversial reference points.
- Regulatory questions — not about motorsport eligibility, but about road-legal use of any thruster hardware — will likely dominate coverage between now and 2028, separate from the suction technology.
- Rival hypercar makers such as Rimac and Lotus are unlikely to respond with their own suction or thruster systems in the near term, given the engineering and certification complexity involved.
- Given the Roadster’s history of delays, a 2028 production date should be treated as a target rather than a guarantee, consistent with CNBC’s framing of the car’s track record.
For deeper detail on the car’s broader track-record claims, Tech-Insider’s reporting on the confirmed and unproven facts around the “flying” Roadster and the reported rocket-trim top-speed figures cover ground this piece intentionally leaves to the side, in favor of the engineering history behind the suction and thruster systems themselves.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did Tesla actually drive the Roadster upside down?
Tesla demonstrated the Roadster driving upside down on an inverted ramp using a suction system, then turning in midair and landing with built-in thrusters, as reported by MotorTrend and TechRadar covering the October 15 unveiling.
What is the Chaparral 2J and how does it relate to the Roadster?
The Chaparral 2J was a 1970 Can-Am race car built by Jim Hall that used two auxiliary engines to drive fans pulling air from underneath its sealed underbody, creating suction-based downforce. It’s the earlier, lesser-known ancestor of the ground-suction concept Tesla’s Roadster demo echoed this week, predating Formula 1’s 1978 Brabham fan car by eight years.
Was the Chaparral 2J banned?
The 2J was not disqualified mid-competition. It raced through the 1970 Can-Am season, after which the SCCA changed its rules for 1971 in a way that made the fan-and-skirt concept ineligible, ending the car’s competitive career.
Are the Roadster’s cold-gas thrusters the same tech NASA used?
They’re based on the same underlying principle used for attitude control on NASA’s Mercury and Gemini programs in the 1960s: high-pressure gas released through a nozzle, producing thrust without combustion. Tesla has described its system as cold-gas thrusters paired with all-electric actuators, developed in collaboration with SpaceX.
How much does the Tesla Roadster cost?
Tesla has not announced a final retail price. Reservations require a $50,000 deposit in the United States, Canada and China, according to CNBC. Figures such as a $245,000 “Thrust” package have circulated but are not confirmed by Tesla.
When will the new Roadster go into production?
Elon Musk said the next-generation Roadster is targeted for production in 2028. Given the car’s history of delayed timelines since its 2017 concept debut, that date should be treated as a target rather than a confirmed delivery schedule.
Can the suction and thruster systems be used on public roads?
No. The October 15 demonstration took place on purpose-built test infrastructure, not a public road, and outlets including evo have been explicit that the stunt shown in the reveal cannot be replicated on public roads.
Is the 80 kN thrust figure or 230 mph top speed confirmed?
No. Those figures, along with a reported “A71” system name and a sub-0.59-second zero-to-60 claim, have circulated online but have not been independently confirmed by Tesla or verified by outlets covering the reveal. Tesla’s own demo timer did show a sub-one-second zero-to-60 run.
