Apple’s newest Pro phones are selling a little better than last year’s, and the gap comes almost entirely from one country. Counterpoint Research reported that global sales of the iPhone 18 Pro series ran 3.1% higher than the iPhone 17 Pro series during the first three weeks after launch. The firm called the start “mixed,” and the regional split shows why.
China did the heavy lifting with sales up 29% year over year, and India also looked strong. The United States and Japan moved the other way, with sales falling year over year in both markets. The numbers come from Counterpoint’s Smartphone Weekly Sales Tracker, and outlets from Reuters to regional business press picked up the story on October 27, 2026.
The result lands in an awkward spot for the narrative around Apple’s autumn. Earlier this month we covered reports that Apple trimmed iPhone 18 Pro orders by up to 20%, and a 3.1% sales gain looks like a very different story from that. Neither data point is wrong. They measure different things, and this article walks through what Counterpoint actually confirmed, what it left out, and what investors and buyers should take from it.
Don't miss new tech stories on Google
Add Tech Insider once in the Google app and our stories appear in your news suggestions.
What Counterpoint Research Actually Reported
The headline claim is narrow and precise. During the first three weeks after the iPhone 18 Pro series went on sale in September 2026, global sell-through of the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max combined came in 3.1% above the iPhone 17 Pro series over the equivalent window a year earlier. That is a growth rate, not a unit count. Counterpoint did not publish absolute volumes in the material we reviewed, so nobody outside the firm can say how many phones that 3.1% represents.
The comparison is also like for like in one important way. Counterpoint matched Pro against Pro and Pro Max against Pro Max, which strips out the effect of Apple changing its lineup mix. If it had compared the whole iPhone range, the picture could look better or worse depending on how base models sold. Pro buyers pay the most, so the Pro tier is where analysts watch first.
Counterpoint’s own framing matters as much as the number. The firm did not call the launch strong or weak. It called it mixed, with stronger performance in China and India and more modest results elsewhere. That wording fits a world where one very large market is carrying the global average while two mature markets drift lower.
The Numbers at a Glance
Here is every figure the available reports confirm, with the source behind each one. Anything not in this table was not confirmed in the coverage we reviewed.
| Metric | Result | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Global sales vs iPhone 17 Pro series (first 3 weeks) | 3.1% higher | Counterpoint Research |
| China, year over year | Up 29% | Counterpoint Research |
| United States, year over year | Declined (no percentage reported) | Counterpoint Research |
| Japan, year over year | Declined (no percentage reported) | Counterpoint Research |
| India | Described as stronger (no percentage reported) | Counterpoint Research |
| iPhone 18 Pro Max share of series sales | 56%, vs 57% for the 17 Pro Max | Counterpoint Research |
| Launch window | September 2026 | Counterpoint Research |
| Data source | Smartphone Weekly Sales Tracker | Counterpoint Research |
Two things stand out. First, only China has a hard percentage attached to it. Second, the United States and Japan are described by direction alone, so readers cannot tell whether the declines are small dips or large drops. That gap in the data limits how far anyone should push the story.
China Carries the Quarter With a 29% Jump
China’s 29% year-over-year increase is the single strongest figure in the report, and it explains most of the global result. Counterpoint’s write-up, as summarized in the research we reviewed, says China contributed the majority of the series’ global sales increase. If one market grows 29% while two others shrink, a global gain of 3.1% is plausible even with a modest China share of the total.
MacRumors, in an October 13 piece on the iPhone taking a bigger slice of a shrinking smartphone market, cited Counterpoint data pointing the same way. Per that report, iPhone 18 Pro sales in China during just the first three days after launch were 12% above what the iPhone 17 Pro sold in its entire first week a year earlier. A fast opening in China fits the 29% three-week figure.
Supply and Android pricing helped
According to the research summary of Counterpoint’s analysis, two factors helped. Apple’s supply ran smoother than during the iPhone 17 Pro launch period, which meant fewer buyers waited on stock. Price increases on competing Chinese Android flagships also nudged shoppers toward Apple. Both points come from Counterpoint’s reasoning as relayed by the reports, and neither comes with a published figure, so treat them as the firm’s interpretation rather than measured effects.
The supply point deserves attention. If last year’s launch was supply-limited, as Counterpoint’s comparison implies, part of this year’s 29% may reflect an easier comparison. A year-over-year jump flatters any product measured against a constrained week one.
Why the United States and Japan Slipped
Counterpoint reported year-over-year declines in both countries. As summarized in the research, US demand suffered from higher prices and from limited perceived improvements in features and design compared with the previous generation. Japan lost ground partly because exchange-rate effects amplified the price increases and weakened demand. Counterpoint did not publish percentages for either market in the coverage we saw.
The point about limited perceived improvements lines up with what we saw in the spec sheet. Our earlier analysis argued that Apple played it safe on battery capacity, with only a small year-on-year bump. When the upgrade story is incremental and the price goes up, upgraders in mature markets tend to hold their old phones longer. The US is a replacement-cycle market, so it reacts to that math faster than China does.
Japan’s case is mostly about currency. A weaker local currency raises the yen price of a dollar-priced product even if Apple holds its dollar price flat. Counterpoint’s point is that the exchange rate magnified the sticker shock, which is a different problem from product disappointment and one Apple cannot fix with software or marketing.
India and the Emerging-Market Pull
Counterpoint singled out India alongside China as a stronger performer, though it did not give an Indian growth rate. The research summary also links stronger Pro-model demand in emerging markets such as India and Southeast Asia to the shift in mix between Pro and Pro Max. Apple’s footprint in those regions has grown steadily, and a Pro-tier tilt there matters because it means buyers are trading up rather than buying entry models.
Local launch coverage has been busy. We tracked the arrival in Southeast Asia in our piece on the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max launch in the Philippines, and Indian shoppers have had a lot to watch with the iPhone Duo pre-order opening in India. The Duo is not part of Counterpoint’s Pro comparison, but it shows how much Apple attention those markets now draw.
iPhone 18 Pro Max Share: 56% vs 57%
One of the more telling details sits in the mix. The iPhone 18 Pro Max represented 56% of iPhone 18 Pro series sales during the first three weeks, compared with 57% for the iPhone 17 Pro Max in the comparable period. A one-point slide looks tiny, but it points to a slight shift toward the smaller Pro model.
Why it matters is simple. The Pro Max carries the highest price in the lineup, so a larger Max share lifts average selling price. A smaller share trims that lift. If emerging-market buyers lean toward the standard Pro, Apple trades a bit of per-unit revenue for volume. Counterpoint’s data cannot tell us the revenue effect because it did not publish prices or unit counts, but the direction is worth tracking over the next few quarters.
How the Smartphone Weekly Sales Tracker Works
Counterpoint pulled the figures from its Smartphone Weekly Sales Tracker, the firm’s research on the segment sits alongside its smartphone model trackers. The weekly cadence is why the firm can compare a specific number of weeks after launch rather than waiting for calendar-quarter totals. That is useful here, because Apple’s September launch only touches a small slice of the quarter.
It also means the data tracks sell-through (devices sold to customers) rather than Apple’s reported shipments. Apple does not disclose iPhone unit sales in its earnings, so third-party trackers like this one are the closest public read on demand. They carry error bars, and the firm’s methodology details were not part of the coverage we reviewed.
How Outlets Framed the Story
Coverage splits into two camps. One leads with the 3.1% global gain, the other leads with China. Headlines on the wire reports are almost word for word, which is typical when several outlets pick up a single research release.
| Outlet | Angle in the headline | Emphasis |
|---|---|---|
| New Straits Times | Initial global sales of iPhone 18 Pro higher than 17 series | Global result |
| IANS | 3.1 percent growth in first three weeks globally | Global result, India reader focus |
| GuruFocus | 3.1% sales growth, boosted by China | China as the driver |
| PhoneArena | Latest global sales estimates are a “mixed” bag | Regional split |
The GuruFocus and PhoneArena framings come closest to the underlying report, because they carry the China boost and the mixed verdict in the headline. The shorter global-only headlines are accurate but incomplete. A reader who sees only “higher than 17 series” would miss that two of the largest premium markets declined.
What Counterpoint Said in Its Own Words
We have three verbatim statements from Counterpoint Research’s published report, and they give the cleanest read on what the firm measured. Counterpoint wrote that “Global sales of the iPhone 18 Pro series were 3.1% higher than sales of the iPhone 17 Pro series during the first three weeks after launch.” That sentence defines the scope of the whole story.
On the regional driver, the firm stated that “Sales of the iPhone 18 Pro series in China increased 29% year over year during the first three weeks after launch.” Note the matching three-week window. The China figure and the global figure use the same yardstick, which makes them directly comparable.
On mix, Counterpoint noted that “The iPhone 18 Pro Max represented 56% of iPhone 18 Pro series sales during the first three weeks after launch, compared with 57% for the iPhone 17 Pro Max in the comparable period.” Taken together, the three statements describe a modest global gain, a big China jump and a small drift toward the smaller Pro model.
Competitive Picture: Android Flagships and Pricing Pressure
Counterpoint’s read on China includes a competitive point. Price increases on rival Chinese Android flagships helped Apple, according to the research summary. When local competitors raise prices, the premium gap to the iPhone narrows, and shoppers who were price-sensitive at the top end find Apple easier to justify. It is a relative win rather than an absolute one, because Apple did not necessarily do anything new.
Outside China, the comparison that matters for premium buyers often runs against Samsung’s biggest phone. Our head-to-head of the iPhone 18 Pro Max against the Galaxy S26 Ultra covers the spec and price trade-offs for readers deciding between them. Counterpoint’s report does not break out Samsung or any other rival’s results, so this release says nothing about whether Android makers gained or lost share in the same three weeks.
Historical Context: Reading a Three-Week Window
Launch-window comparisons are common in the smartphone trade, and they come with a built-in caveat. The first weeks of any iPhone cycle capture the most eager buyers, preorders and pent-up demand. A strong open does not guarantee a strong holiday quarter, and a soft open does not doom one. The iPhone 17 Pro comparison base also matters, since it was itself a launch with its own supply quirks, as the China supply point above suggests.
Counterpoint’s phrase “mixed start” signals that the firm sees this as an early read. The September 2026 launch put the 18 Pro series on shelves in more than 65 countries and regions according to Apple’s launch announcement as cited in the research, so a handful of markets decide the global average. When China swings 29% and the US dips, the arithmetic of a 3.1% global result is a reminder that the iPhone is now a story of regional divergence rather than one smooth global curve.
Market Impact for Apple, Suppliers and Investors
For Apple, a 3.1% gain at the Pro tier is a quiet positive. It does not match the buzz around the company’s foldable, which dominated launch week and which we followed in the story on how the iPhone Duo sold out in minutes and slipped to 2027 deliveries. But Pro-tier growth in the face of declines in the US and Japan suggests Apple’s China recovery is real, at least for the first three weeks.
For suppliers and component makers, the data supports steady rather than surging Pro-model builds. For investors, the lesson is concentration. A 29% Chinese rise props up the global line, so any Chinese demand wobble, regulation shift or competitive launch would hit the Pro series harder than in the past. Our broader hardware coverage in the hardware section tracks how component and device makers are positioning around that risk.
Apple does not break out iPhone units in its earnings, so analysts will lean on trackers like Counterpoint’s for color. A 3.1% launch-window gain is unlikely to move estimates on its own. What it does is blunt the most bearish reading, the one that came from the earlier order-cut headlines.
What Remains Unconfirmed
Several details readers will want are missing from the public record. We list them here so nobody mistakes silence for confirmation.
| Detail | Status |
|---|---|
| Absolute unit sales for the iPhone 18 Pro series | Not published |
| US and Japan decline percentages | Not published |
| India growth rate | Not published |
| Revenue or average selling price impact | Not published |
| Rival brand results over the same window | Not covered in this report |
| Exact launch-day sales split by model | Not published beyond 56% vs 57% Pro Max share |
| Direct statements from Apple executives on the result | None found |
Apple has not commented on Counterpoint’s numbers in anything we could find. That is normal, as the company rarely responds to third-party tracker data.
Five Predictions for the iPhone 18 Pro Sales Story
These are our own forecasts based on the Counterpoint data, not reported facts.
- China stays the swing market. Expect the next Counterpoint update to show China still ahead of the US by a wide margin in growth terms, though the 29% rate will cool as the easy comparison fades.
- US sales stay soft through the holidays. Promotions and carrier trade-in offers will cushion the dip, but the perceived-upgrade problem will not disappear without a price move.
- The Pro Max share keeps sliding. If emerging-market demand keeps tilting toward the smaller Pro, the 56% figure could drift lower in later windows.
- Analysts will quote the 3.1% figure for months. It is clean, easy to cite and easy to misread. Watch for outlets that drop the “mixed” qualifier.
- Counterpoint will publish a longer-window update. A full-quarter read will confirm or undercut the early China surge, and that update matters more than this one.
FAQ
How much higher are iPhone 18 Pro sales than iPhone 17 Pro sales?
Counterpoint Research says global sales of the iPhone 18 Pro series were 3.1% higher than the iPhone 17 Pro series during the first three weeks after launch.
Which country drove the growth?
China. Counterpoint reported sales there rose 29% year over year in the comparison period, and India also performed well.
Did iPhone 18 Pro sales fall anywhere?
Yes. The United States and Japan both saw year-over-year declines, though Counterpoint’s reported coverage gave no percentages for either.
How many iPhone 18 Pro units were sold?
No unit figure has been confirmed. Counterpoint reported growth rates and share data, and Apple does not disclose iPhone unit sales.
Where does the data come from?
Counterpoint’s Smartphone Weekly Sales Tracker, which follows sell-through week by week after launch.
What share of sales was the iPhone 18 Pro Max?
The Pro Max made up 56% of the series’ sales in the first three weeks, versus 57% for the 17 Pro Max in the comparable period.
Should I buy an iPhone 18 Pro based on this report?
Sales data says how many people bought, not whether the phone suits you. Our ranking of the best iPhone to buy compares the current lineup by price and use case.
