Rockstar Games runs its launch cycles on silence, so every music rumor around Grand Theft Auto VI lands hard. The newest one claims Rockstar wanted Daft Punk for the soundtrack first and settled on Justice second. NME reported the claim, which traces back to the music leaker Has It Leaked on X. Neither Rockstar Games nor Daft Punk has publicly confirmed it.
The confirmed side is smaller but solid. Justice created an original score for Grand Theft Auto VI and contributed to Grand Theft Auto 6 â The Album, which contains 34 new tracks. Our earlier look at the Daft Punk GTA 6 rumor and the leaker’s track record covered the first wave of coverage. This piece takes a different angle: what the GTA 6 soundtrack leak proves, what it does not, and what it signals for the weeks ahead.
Some headlines say fans were left devastated. That reaction has not been measured. No poll, survey or sales figure backs it up, so treat it as headline shorthand for a loud day on social media. The story itself still matters, because it shows how a single unverified post can reshape the conversation around the biggest game release of the year.
Don't miss new tech stories on Google
Add Tech Insider once in the Google app and our stories appear in your news suggestions.
What the GTA 6 Soundtrack Leak Actually Claims
The leak is a bundle of four separate claims, and they carry very different weight. Has It Leaked said Daft Punk was Rockstar’s original choice for the soundtrack. The account said Rockstar offered Daft Punk’s management an essentially unlimited budget. It described the project as a possible final comeback for the duo. And it said Justice was the second choice.
NME carried the claim. MusicRadar framed its coverage as a question about whether Daft Punk turned down the offer, and Gameranx ran its own rumor write-up. Each outlet attributed the story to the leaker rather than to Rockstar or either act. That attribution is the most important detail in the whole saga.
Notice what the leak does not say. It does not include a statement from Rockstar, a statement from Daft Punk’s representatives or a document. Nothing in the reporting shows that Daft Punk formally rejected an offer, even though some headlines nudge readers toward that conclusion. A rumor that an act was approached is one thing. A rumor that the act said no is another claim entirely, and nobody has sourced it.
What Rockstar and Justice Have Actually Confirmed
Rockstar Games and Justice have both been publicly associated with the game’s original score. That is the anchor fact. Everything else in this story hangs off it, and it needs no leaker to hold it up. If you want a refresher on the music already shown to the public, our guide to the GTA 6 soundtrack, trailer songs and album status lays it out.
The original score
Justice created an original score for Grand Theft Auto VI. A score differs from a licensed song. It is music written to fit the game, its scenes and its pacing, and it sits under the action instead of playing on a radio dial. Handing that job to one act gives the game a single sonic fingerprint.
Grand Theft Auto 6 â The Album
Justice also contributed to Grand Theft Auto 6 â The Album, which contains 34 new tracks. The word “new” matters here. It points to music made for this project rather than catalog songs pulled from a label’s back shelf. Thirty-four tracks is a large body of material, which suggests Rockstar treats the music as a product in its own right and not as set dressing.
The fact sheet we work from does not list the other artists, release format or track order for the album, so we will not guess at them. Those details belong to Rockstar’s announcements, and we will report them when they arrive.
Who Is Has It Leaked and Why Sourcing Matters
Has It Leaked is a music-news leaker on X. When another user questioned the Daft Punk claim, the account answered, as MusicRadar reported, that it had leaked Daft Punk and Justice news for 10+ years. That is a claim about experience, not a receipt. A long streak builds credibility, but it does not turn a single post into confirmed fact.
The skeptics were just as blunt. NME reported a reply to the claim that read, in full, “Source: I made this up”. That is a joke from an unidentified account, and it proves nothing either way. It does show how quickly the audience split into believers and doubters within hours of the post.
Leaks in the GTA world have a mixed record, and some are real. The studio’s own pipeline has leaked before, as in the case of the man fired after leaking GTA 6 Vice City ads. A rumor about private contract talks is a different species. It depends on a human source who may have heard a second-hand story, and nobody outside the room can audit it.
The Daft Punk Claim, Piece by Piece
The cleanest way to read this story is to separate each statement and grade it. The table below does that using only what Rockstar, Justice and the cited outlets have put on the record.
| Claim | Status | Who stands behind it |
|---|---|---|
| Justice created an original score for Grand Theft Auto VI | Confirmed | Rockstar Games and Justice, publicly associated |
| Grand Theft Auto 6 â The Album has 34 new tracks | Confirmed | Publicly reported alongside Justice’s contribution |
| Justice contributed to the album | Confirmed | Rockstar Games and Justice, publicly associated |
| Daft Punk was Rockstar’s original choice | Unconfirmed | Has It Leaked on X |
| Rockstar offered “essentially an unlimited budget” | Unconfirmed | Has It Leaked on X |
| The project was a “final comeback” pitch | Unconfirmed | Has It Leaked on X |
| Justice was Rockstar’s second choice | Unconfirmed | Has It Leaked on X |
| Daft Punk formally rejected the offer | Unconfirmed | No named source |
Three rows are solid, five are not. The split is lopsided in a useful way. Every confirmed row concerns Justice, and every unconfirmed row concerns the story about who came first. If you only trust the top half of the table, you lose nothing about the game itself.
The quoted phrases in the table come from the leaker’s own wording as reported by NME. Per that report, Has It Leaked said Daft Punk’s management was pitched “a final comeback” and “essentially an unlimited budget”. Those words belong to the leaker. They are not Rockstar’s words, and no outlet has shown Rockstar using them.
Why the Reaction Ran So Hot
Daft Punk carries enormous weight with gamers and music fans alike. The thought of a Rockstar project pairing with that name, and then not happening, is catnip for social media. A story about what might have been spreads faster than a story about what is, because it invites everyone to imagine their own version of the soundtrack.
There is also a timing effect. Fans have waited years for this game, and Rockstar has shared little. When information is scarce, any new detail becomes a Rorschach test. Those who liked Justice’s work read the leak as a footnote. Those who wanted Daft Punk read it as a loss. Both readings come from the same unverified post.
That dynamic also explains why the “devastated” framing took hold in headlines. It is a shareable emotional hook. As a measure of sentiment, it is empty until someone surveys players. The same pre-launch hunger drives interest in everything from the GTA 6 cast and character details to the smallest audio clue.
Original Score vs Licensed Radio: Why the Difference Matters
Grand Theft Auto games usually carry two audio layers. The first is licensed or commissioned music that plays through in-game radio. The second is the score, the cues that frame story missions and set emotional tone. Justice’s confirmed role sits in the second layer, along with a contribution to the album.
That distinction changes how to read the Daft Punk rumor. Even if the story were true, it would concern the score job, which is the most personal and sustained music assignment in a game. A score defines how the whole world feels for dozens of hours. Picking one act for it is closer to hiring a director than booking a headliner.
It also explains the stakes. A licensed radio station can carry many voices at once, so no single choice defines it. A score concentrates the decision. When the leaker says Justice came second, the implied claim is that Rockstar went through a ranked shortlist for this one slot. That is plausible as a process, but plausible is not proven.
Historical Context: Music as Grand Theft Auto’s Identity
Music has been central to the series for a long time. Its radio stations became cultural reference points for whole eras, and Rockstar built much of the franchise’s personality on curation. Players remember the stations as much as the missions. That history is why a soundtrack story gets treated as gaming news and not as entertainment gossip.
What is new here is the scale of the original-music play. A 34-track album of new material, plus a commissioned score, shows a publisher that wants to own its sound in a way catalog licensing cannot deliver. Owned music is easier to market on streaming platforms, easier to tie to trailers and easier to keep consistent over time.
The Daft Punk story fits an older pattern too. Big creative partnerships get rumored long before they get announced, and many rumors turn out partly right and partly wrong. A rumor can capture the shape of a negotiation while botching the details. That is why the safest stance is to hold the claim at arm’s length until a named party speaks.
Market Impact: What a 34-Track Album Means for Rockstar
The music is part of a much larger commercial picture. Coverage keeps probing how big this launch could get, from the GTA VI budget and the limits of AAA gaming to its effect on competing releases. An original album adds a second revenue and marketing surface that sits outside the game itself.
For Justice, the confirmed association puts the duo in front of an audience that dwarfs a normal album cycle. For Rockstar, a high-profile electronic act gives the trailers and the launch a sound that travels across platforms. Both sides gain, which is why the confirmed arrangement needs no rumor to look like a smart deal.
The leak’s market effect so far looks small and indirect. It adds chatter, not demand. Nobody can claim it moved console sales, and readers weighing hardware for launch day are better served by our best console for GTA 6 breakdown than by a music rumor. For more game coverage, the gaming section tracks the rest of the launch cycle.
Competitive Comparison: How the Music Strategy Differs
Publishers handle game music in a few broad ways. Some lean on a single composer, some license heavily and some commission a mix. The table compares those approaches in general terms, then places Rockstar’s confirmed plan within them. It describes strategy, not any specific rival title.
| Approach | Typical strength | Typical risk | Rockstar’s confirmed position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single composer score | Consistent tone across the game | One taste defines everything | Justice created the original score |
| Heavy catalog licensing | Instant familiarity for players | Rights costs and expiry issues | Not confirmed for this release |
| Commissioned album of new tracks | Ownable, marketable music | Needs a big creative roster | 34 new tracks on the album |
| Big-name reunion pitch | Massive headline value | Hard to land, easy to rumor | Unconfirmed, leaker only |
| Hybrid of score and licensed radio | Covers mood and nostalgia | Complex to manage | Not detailed in confirmed facts |
The takeaway: Rockstar’s confirmed plan blends the first and third rows. It pairs a single act’s score with a large pool of new tracks. The reunion pitch row is the only one that depends on the leak, and it is the only one with no named backer.
How to Read a Pre-Launch Leak Cycle
Pre-launch weeks produce a flood of claims, so it helps to run each one through the same filter. Ask who said it, whether they have a track record, whether a second source backs it and whether the claim can be checked once the game ships. The Daft Punk story fails the second-source test today.
Credits will be the final check once the game and album are out. Composer and performer credits are public record, and they will show who actually worked on the project. They cannot show who was approached and said no, though. That means part of this story may never be settled, because the missing evidence is a conversation, not a credit line.
Outlets also carry responsibility. A report that says “a leaker claims” stays honest. A report that drops the leaker and says “Daft Punk turned down Rockstar” invents a fact. The gap between those two phrasings is the gap between journalism and amplification, and readers should watch for it.
Industry Voices and What They Add
The only named voices on this story so far are the leaker and an anonymous skeptic. Has It Leaked told its audience, per the MusicRadar report, that it has leaked Daft Punk and Justice news for 10+ years. NME’s coverage includes the sarcastic “Source: I made this up” reply. Gameranx reported that Justice has praised Daft Punk’s sampling instincts, a point we paraphrase because we cannot verify the exact wording.
Note what is missing. No Rockstar executive has spoken on the record about the Daft Punk claim. No Daft Punk representative has either, and Justice has not addressed the second-choice label. Until one of those parties talks, the strongest honest summary is that a known leaker made specific claims and the principals have stayed quiet.
Silence from Rockstar is normal, not telling. The studio rarely comments on rumors, and it did not need to here. Silence from the artists is also ordinary, since confirming or denying a private negotiation can burn bridges with a future partner. Neither silence counts as evidence of truth or falsehood.
Five Predictions for the Weeks Ahead
These are analysis, not reporting, and they could age badly. Each one rests on how studios and artists have usually behaved around rumors like this.
- Rockstar stays quiet on Daft Punk. The studio gains nothing by confirming a rumor about a deal that did not happen, and it keeps its messaging on Justice.
- Album details land closer to launch. Rockstar has confirmed the album’s size, so the track list and credits are the natural next reveal.
- Daft Punk’s camp stays silent. Representatives rarely address unverified claims about private talks, so expect no formal denial or confirmation.
- Copycat rumors multiply. Once one music leak travels, others pile on with recycled or embellished versions, so expect more unsourced claims.
- Justice gets the spotlight. The confirmed score and album keep the duo at the center of music coverage once the game ships.
If any of these breaks, the most likely trigger is a named statement from Rockstar, Justice or Daft Punk’s management. Absent that, the story stays a rumor with a confirmed core.
What Players Should Take From the Leak
The practical advice is simple. Trust the confirmed items, which are Justice’s score and the 34-track album. Treat the Daft Punk story as an interesting but unproven account. Do not let it color your expectations of the music, because the music that will ship is the music that was confirmed.
Also be wary of emotional headlines. Words like devastated and heartbroken describe a mood the writer wants you to feel, not a finding. A fair test is whether the article names its source and says what is unconfirmed. This one does both, and we will update it if Rockstar, Justice or Daft Punk’s representatives speak on the record.
GTA 6 Soundtrack Leak: FAQ
Did Rockstar confirm Daft Punk was the first choice for GTA 6?
No. The claim comes from the leaker Has It Leaked on X. Neither Rockstar Games nor Daft Punk has publicly confirmed it.
Who created the GTA 6 original score?
Justice created an original score for Grand Theft Auto VI. Rockstar Games and Justice have both been publicly associated with it.
What is Grand Theft Auto 6 â The Album?
It is an album of 34 new tracks, and Justice contributed to it. Beyond that, we are not reporting details that have not been confirmed.
Did Daft Punk reject Rockstar’s offer?
Nobody has shown that. No named source says Daft Punk formally rejected an offer, so treat any such claim as unconfirmed.
Is Justice really Rockstar’s second choice?
That label comes only from the leaker. It is unconfirmed, and it does not change the confirmed fact that Justice made the score.
Were fans really devastated by the leak?
The reaction has not been measured. The word appears in headlines, but no survey or data supports it.
Where did the Daft Punk claim start?
It started with Has It Leaked on X. NME, MusicRadar and Gameranx all reported it as a leaker’s claim.
