A former EVGA employee has put fresh, granular detail on a story the PC hardware world thought it already understood: why one of Nvidia’s most trusted board partners walked away from graphics cards entirely in September 2022. According to reporting published by Wccftech and corroborated by TechSpot on September 29, 2026, Brendon Ray Hedrick, who worked at EVGA from February 2016 to December 2019, says Nvidia’s pricing rules forced the company to sell some GeForce cards at a loss just to stay visible at the manufacturer’s advertised starting price. TechPowerUp, also reporting in September 2026, quoted Hedrick making much the same point in blunter terms: Nvidia’s own Founders Edition cards directly intensified the competition EVGA’s GeForce lineup had to fight through. Hedrick left almost three years before EVGA’s public exit, and his account reframes the 2022 breakup not as a sudden rupture but as the end point of a slow squeeze that insiders saw coming years earlier.
The timing matters. EVGA’s split from Nvidia in September 2022 remains one of the most talked-about vendor breakups in PC hardware history, and four years later it’s still shaping how gamers, retailers, and rival board partners think about Nvidia’s power over the add-in-board (AIB) market. Tom’s Hardware, reporting in September 2026, framed the scale of the breakup bluntly: EVGA walked away after 22 years as an Nvidia partner, exiting just before the RTX 40-series launch, a figure TechSpot’s own September 2026 reporting corroborated. Hedrick’s account, surfacing now in late September 2026, adds a first-person layer to a story that until now has mostly been told through EVGA executives’ public statements from 2022.
Don't miss new tech stories on Google
Add Tech Insider once in the Google app and our stories appear in your news suggestions.
What the former EVGA employee actually said
According to Wccftech’s report, Hedrick described a pricing structure where EVGA felt obligated to keep at least one GeForce card available at Nvidia’s advertised MSRP, even when that specific model generated little to no profit and, in some cases, reportedly caused a loss. These entry-level cards functioned as loss leaders: they kept EVGA visible at the price point Nvidia had publicly promoted, while pricier, higher-margin cards further up the stack were supposed to make up the difference.
Hedrick reportedly said the pressure intensified during the RTX 20-series generation, when EVGA was sometimes required to sell cheaper cards with minimal profit while leaning on higher-priced models to keep the business afloat. VideoCardz’s September 2026 reporting corroborated the core claim directly, writing that Nvidia’s pricing rules forced some EVGA GeForce cards to sell at a loss, and Club386’s coverage the same month went further, reporting that Nvidia required loss-making sales specifically on popular GeForce models rather than niche SKUs. TechSpot’s September 2026 coverage added that EVGA reportedly lost hundreds of dollars on RTX 3080 and RTX 3090 cards after price cuts, and The FPS Review reported the same month that EVGA allegedly risked incomplete Nvidia GPU allocations unless it sold some cards at a loss. The recurring theme, per Wccftech, TechSpot, VideoCardz, and Club386’s coverage alike, is Nvidia’s Founders Edition line: reference cards sold directly by Nvidia that increasingly competed with the same partners who were building around Nvidia’s own silicon. Because Nvidia controlled the GPU, the reference board design, launch pricing, and initial availability, board partners like EVGA had limited room to differentiate their products or set prices that reflected their own manufacturing and R&D costs.
It’s worth being precise about what this account does and doesn’t establish. Hedrick left EVGA in December 2019, nearly three years before the company’s public GPU exit in September 2022. His account, first published on his own site on September 26, 2026, is retrospective context about the internal economics he witnessed, not a claim that he predicted the shutdown or was involved in the final decision. Still, the timeline strengthens a case that has been circulating since 2022: EVGA’s frustrations with Nvidia’s partner terms were not a late-stage grievance but a structural problem that employees inside the company could see years before it became public.
Timeline: how EVGA’s graphics card business unraveled
Piecing together the reporting from Wccftech, TechSpot, and earlier coverage from 2022, the sequence looks like this. EVGA’s relationship with Nvidia had been a defining part of the company’s identity for more than two decades, with EVGA building its brand almost entirely around GeForce cards, motherboards, and power supplies. That concentration is exactly what made the later breakup so consequential for EVGA’s business.
| Date | Event | Source |
|---|---|---|
| February 2016 | Brendon Ray Hedrick begins working at EVGA | Wccftech |
| 2016–2019 | Hedrick describes loss-leading GeForce pricing and rising Founders Edition competition during his tenure | Wccftech, TechSpot |
| December 2019 | Hedrick leaves EVGA, roughly three years before the public GPU exit | Wccftech |
| April–June 2022 | EVGA reportedly informs Nvidia privately of its plan to exit the GPU business | SlashGear |
| September 16, 2022 | EVGA publicly announces it will stop building Nvidia graphics cards and end the partnership | Wikipedia |
| September 2022 | EVGA CEO Andrew Han and chief branding officer Joe Darwin discuss the decision publicly, describing “mistreatment” and a strained relationship with Nvidia | CoinDesk |
| September 29–30, 2026 | Hedrick’s account resurfaces in Wccftech and TechSpot reporting, adding employee-level detail to the 2022 exit | Wccftech, TechSpot |
What stands out in this timeline is the gap between when the underlying economic pressure existed, according to Hedrick’s account of 2016-2019, and when EVGA actually acted on it, in 2022. That’s a multi-year lag between the problem being visible internally and the company making a public break, and the wind-down itself stretched out further still: PC Guide reported in September 2026 that EVGA didn’t actually end Nvidia GPU production until roughly three years after announcing its exit, with Yahoo Finance reporting the same month that EVGA sold off its remaining RTX 30-series inventory before production finally stopped. For an AIB partner of EVGA’s size, walking away from Nvidia meant giving up a category that, according to Wikipedia’s summary of EVGA’s public statements, accounted for close to 80% of the company’s gross revenue at the time of the announcement. That’s not a decision companies make lightly, which is part of why Hedrick’s account of years-earlier warning signs is getting attention now.
The economics: revenue share versus profit margin
The core tension in Hedrick’s account, and in EVGA’s own 2022 statements, is a mismatch between how much revenue graphics cards generated and how little profit they actually returned. Graphics cards made up roughly 80% of EVGA’s gross revenue, according to the company’s public disclosures reported by Wikipedia, yet other product lines, particularly power supplies, delivered far better margins. EVGA CEO Andrew Han was reported by CoinDesk as saying the company made roughly 300% more margin on power supplies than it did on graphics cards.
That imbalance is the mechanical explanation behind Hedrick’s loss-leader description. Yahoo Finance reported in August 2026 that EVGA’s GPU profit margins fell to about 5%, versus roughly 10% for other partners. If a company’s flagship revenue category is also its least profitable one, and the pricing structure for that category is set largely by a supplier rather than the company itself, the arrangement becomes difficult to sustain no matter how strong brand loyalty is. EVGA had one of the most loyal customer bases in PC hardware, reportedly holding around 40% of the North American market for Nvidia-branded cards at points during its run, yet that market position didn’t translate into pricing leverage over its own supplier.
Industry-wide AIB margin data cited in CoinDesk’s 2022 coverage, sourced to Jon Peddie Research, illustrates just how much this business shrank over two decades: graphics card AIB margins were around 25% in 2000, falling to roughly 5% by 2022. That’s not a story about one troubled vendor relationship. It’s a story about an entire product category becoming structurally less profitable for the companies that build around it, even as GPU prices themselves climbed.
Founders Edition: partner or competitor?
A recurring complaint in both Hedrick’s account and EVGA’s 2022 statements centers on Nvidia’s Founders Edition cards. These are graphics cards designed, manufactured, and sold directly by Nvidia, running alongside the exact same silicon that AIB partners like EVGA, ASUS, MSI, Gigabyte, and Zotac use to build their own products. On paper, Founders Edition cards were meant to set a reference standard. In practice, according to the reporting, they increasingly functioned as direct competition for the partners Nvidia depended on to reach the broader retail market.
The structural problem is straightforward: Nvidia controls the GPU die, the reference board design, the launch pricing, and often the initial retail availability window. Board partners, by contrast, have to absorb their own board design costs, cooling solutions, manufacturing, warranty support, and marketing, all while being asked to hit a price point that Nvidia sets and publicizes before partners always know the full picture. According to TechSpot’s account of the reporting, EVGA executives also complained that partners weren’t always told final GPU pricing until it was revealed publicly at launch, leaving little room to plan margin structures around Nvidia’s own competing product.
This dynamic isn’t unique to EVGA. It has shaped complaints from AIB partners across the industry for years, and it’s part of why some enthusiasts describe Nvidia’s board partner program as a controlled ecosystem rather than a true competitive marketplace. Related coverage on this site of the current RTX 5090’s power delivery issues and PNY’s warranty denial over a melted 12V-2×6 connector shows the same tension playing out today: AIB partners absorbing consumer-facing risk for hardware decisions largely dictated by Nvidia’s reference design.
Why this resurfaces now, in late 2026
Hedrick’s account isn’t breaking entirely new ground on the “why” of EVGA’s exit, EVGA’s own executives addressed that in 2022, and PCGamesHardware’s September 2026 reporting distilled the exit down to the same three causes: Founders Edition competition, low margins, and rising costs. What it adds is a worker’s-eye view from years before the exit, which matters for a market currently watching Nvidia’s board partner relationships more closely than ever, especially since TechPowerUp reported back in July 2026 that another former EVGA product manager had already confirmed Founders Edition competition as a factor in the decision. Nvidia’s GPU pricing and supply decisions remain under intense scrutiny in 2026, from the ongoing fallout over RTX 5090 power connector failures to reports that Nvidia’s next-generation GPU architecture has slipped, with some leakers pointing to a delay into 2028. Every one of those stories touches the same underlying question Hedrick’s account raises: how much control should one supplier have over the partners that build, market, and support its hardware at retail?
There’s also a market-supply angle. Nvidia’s decision to discontinue 2GB GDDR7 modules has already tightened RTX 50-series supply chains this year, according to reporting covered elsewhere on this site, and AIB partners are once again absorbing the operational consequences of a decision made entirely upstream. Hedrick’s account, even though it describes events from 2016-2019, reads as a preview of exactly that dynamic: partners bearing cost and reputational risk for choices made by the GPU maker.
Competitive comparison: how other AIB partners have handled the same pressure
EVGA is the only major Nvidia AIB partner to exit the graphics card business entirely, but it isn’t the only one that has felt the margin squeeze Hedrick describes. The difference is in how each company diversified around the pressure.
| AIB Partner | Response to Nvidia margin pressure | GPU business status (2026) |
|---|---|---|
| EVGA | Exited the GPU business entirely in September 2022, citing thin margins and Founders Edition competition | No longer makes GeForce cards; focuses on power supplies and other components |
| ASUS | Diversified into laptops, motherboards, and networking to offset thin GPU margins | Continues building GeForce and Radeon cards across ROG, TUF, and Prime lines |
| MSI | Leaned into premium overclocked SKUs and gaming laptops for higher margins | Continues building GeForce and Radeon cards, active in both consumer and workstation segments |
| Gigabyte | Expanded into motherboards, servers, and enterprise hardware alongside GPUs | Continues building GeForce and Radeon cards |
| Zotac | Focused on compact-form-factor cards and mini-PCs as a differentiator | Continues building GeForce cards, largely absent from Radeon |
| PNY | Positioned as a value-focused Nvidia specialist with minimal product diversification | Continues building GeForce cards; faced its own 2026 warranty controversy over melted power connectors |
The pattern is clear: every AIB partner still building Nvidia cards today has some form of diversification EVGA lacked at scale. EVGA’s power supply business was strong, generating that reported 300% margin advantage over GPUs, but it wasn’t large enough to offset the sheer revenue weight of graphics cards, which is exactly the trap Hedrick’s account describes from the inside.
Historical context: Nvidia’s board partner model since the 2000s
Nvidia’s AIB partner system dates back to the early 2000s, when the company began licensing its GPU designs to third-party manufacturers rather than selling finished cards directly, a model that let Nvidia scale distribution without owning retail relationships. For most of that period, margins were healthy enough that dozens of companies competed in the space. Jon Peddie Research’s historical figures, cited by CoinDesk, put AIB margins around 25% in 2000. By 2022, that figure had reportedly fallen to around 5%, a collapse that tracks closely with the rise of Nvidia’s own Founders Edition program and tighter reference pricing controls.
Over that same period, the AIB field consolidated significantly. Companies like BFG Technologies, XFX (which shifted to AMD exclusively), and several smaller regional partners either exited the GPU business or narrowed their focus well before EVGA did. EVGA’s exit was more prominent because of its brand strength and reputation for customer service, but it was part of a longer pattern of AIB attrition rather than an isolated event. Hedrick’s account, describing pressure that was already building by 2016, fits neatly into that longer arc rather than standing apart from it.
The 2022 exit also landed at a specific moment: shortly after the Ethereum Merge eliminated GPU mining demand for the Ethereum network, flooding the used market with cards and depressing prices right as Nvidia was preparing its next GeForce generation. That external shock compounded the structural margin problem Hedrick describes, giving EVGA a concrete trigger to act on frustrations that, according to his account, had been building for years.
Market impact: what this means for the AIB ecosystem in 2026
Hedrick’s account lands at a moment when board partner economics are once again under pressure. RTX 50-series power connector failures have driven warranty disputes between partners like PNY and their customers, GDDR7 memory shortages are squeezing card supply heading into the next product cycle, and reports point to a delayed next-generation Nvidia architecture pushing into 2028. Each of these stories independently reinforces the picture Hedrick paints: AIB partners operate with limited pricing control, absorb consumer-facing risk for supplier decisions, and have thin room to maneuver when costs or supply shift.
For remaining Nvidia AIB partners, the lesson from EVGA’s exit, now reinforced by Hedrick’s insider account, is that diversification isn’t optional. Companies that spread revenue across laptops, motherboards, peripherals, and enterprise hardware have far more room to absorb a thin-margin GPU generation than a company built primarily around graphics cards. That’s precisely the imbalance EVGA couldn’t solve.
There’s also a reputational dimension. EVGA’s decision to leave rather than continue operating at thin or negative margins on some SKUs preserved its brand equity in a way that continuing under worsening terms might not have. Four years later, the company is frequently cited, including in this new reporting, as the cautionary example other partners study when negotiating terms with GPU makers, whether Nvidia or AMD.
What EVGA does instead of GPUs in 2026
Since exiting the graphics card business in 2022, EVGA has continued operating in the categories that delivered stronger margins, primarily power supplies, alongside a smaller footprint in other PC components. The company explicitly chose not to replace its Nvidia GPU lineup with AMD or Intel cards when it exited, a decision EVGA’s leadership attributed at the time to the broader economics of the AIB business rather than any specific issue with those other GPU makers. That choice has left EVGA absent from one of the most visible categories in PC hardware for four years running, even as its brand recognition among enthusiasts remains largely intact.
Analysis: what Hedrick’s account changes and what it doesn’t
It’s important to separate what this new reporting actually establishes from what it doesn’t. Hedrick’s account strengthens the case that EVGA’s 2022 complaints about Nvidia weren’t a reaction dreamed up for a press statement, they reflect pricing mechanics that employees were dealing with years earlier. What it doesn’t do is prove that Nvidia alone caused EVGA’s exit. EVGA’s own 2022 statements pointed to a mix of factors: thin AIB margins industrywide, competition from Founders Edition cards, the post-Ethereum-Merge crash in GPU demand, and the company’s own strategic calculation that other product categories offered better returns.
Multiple outlets, including Wccftech, TechSpot, PCGuide, and SlashGear, converge on the same underlying narrative even while using slightly different framing: Nvidia’s control over pricing, reference designs, and Founders Edition placement left partners like EVGA with structurally thin margins that became harder to justify as costs rose. Hedrick’s account adds a named, on-the-ground voice to that narrative rather than overturning it.
Predictions: where AIB-Nvidia relations go from here
Based on the patterns in this reporting and the broader trajectory of the AIB market, here’s what’s likely to play out over the next year or two.
- More partner diversification, not exits. Given EVGA’s experience, expect remaining AIB partners to keep expanding into laptops, peripherals, and enterprise hardware rather than risk a full GPU exit, spreading risk rather than concentrating it the way EVGA once did.
- Continued scrutiny of Founders Edition placement. As Nvidia’s next GPU generation approaches, expect renewed debate over how aggressively Nvidia prices and stocks its own reference cards relative to partner availability, a direct echo of the complaints in Hedrick’s account.
- Warranty and reliability disputes stay a flashpoint. With RTX 50-series connector failures already straining partner-consumer relationships, as seen in PNY’s 2026 warranty denial, expect more friction over who absorbs the cost when reference-design flaws surface in partner products.
- EVGA’s exit remains the reference case. Expect EVGA’s 2022 departure, and accounts like Hedrick’s, to keep surfacing whenever AIB margin disputes make news, functioning as the industry’s go-to cautionary tale.
- Supply constraints add new pressure. With GDDR7 memory tightening and a next-generation architecture reportedly delayed toward 2028, AIB partners face a longer runway on current-generation margins, for better or worse, before any relief from a true next-gen refresh.
How this fits the broader Nvidia GPU pricing story in 2026
Hedrick’s account doesn’t exist in isolation. It arrives during a year when Nvidia’s pricing and supply decisions have repeatedly made headlines: RTX 5090 power draw and connector heat issues, PNY’s warranty pushback, Micron’s exit from 2GB GDDR7 production squeezing RTX 50-series supply, and persistent leaker claims that Nvidia’s next architecture has slipped toward 2028. Readers following any of those threads will recognize the same dynamic Hedrick describes from 2016-2019: a supplier setting the terms, and partners absorbing the operational and reputational consequences.
None of this means Nvidia’s dominance is at risk. The company remains the clear leader in discrete GPUs by a wide margin, and its Founders Edition strategy has been commercially successful even as it strained partner relationships. But stories like Hedrick’s, and the pattern of RTX 50-series partner friction throughout 2026, suggest the tension between Nvidia and its board partners hasn’t gone away since EVGA’s exit. It has simply shifted to whichever partners remain.
Frequently asked questions
Who is Brendon Ray Hedrick?
He is a former EVGA employee who worked at the company from February 2016 to December 2019, and whose recent comments, reported by Wccftech and TechSpot, describe internal pricing pressure from Nvidia during his tenure.
When did EVGA stop making Nvidia graphics cards?
EVGA publicly announced its exit from the GPU business on September 16, 2022, ending its partnership with Nvidia, according to the company’s public statements summarized on Wikipedia.
Did Hedrick predict EVGA’s exit before it happened?
No. Hedrick left EVGA in December 2019, nearly three years before the public exit. His account describes pricing conditions he witnessed while employed there, not foreknowledge of the 2022 decision.
Why did EVGA blame Nvidia’s Founders Edition cards?
According to the reporting, Nvidia’s own Founders Edition cards competed directly with EVGA’s products while Nvidia simultaneously controlled the reference design, launch pricing, and availability that partners had to work around.
How much of EVGA’s revenue came from graphics cards?
Graphics cards accounted for close to 80% of EVGA’s gross revenue at the time of its 2022 exit, according to the company’s public statements.
Did EVGA switch to AMD or Intel GPUs after leaving Nvidia?
No. EVGA chose not to replace its Nvidia lineup with AMD or Intel graphics cards, focusing instead on power supplies and other existing product categories.
Are other Nvidia AIB partners facing the same pressure in 2026?
Yes. Reporting throughout 2026 on RTX 5090 power connector failures, warranty disputes, and GDDR7 memory shortages points to continued friction between Nvidia and the partners that build around its reference designs.
What happened to AIB profit margins industry-wide?
Data cited from Jon Peddie Research shows AIB graphics card margins falling from roughly 25% in 2000 to around 5% by 2022, reflecting a long-term industry trend rather than a problem unique to EVGA.
