
ãéèŠãªè«æðããEffects of the Bank of Japanâs intervention on yen/dollar exchange rate volatilityãïŒå è¡ç 究解説 No.1 2023/08/30
IntroductionïŒåæ¥è«æã¯æ©ãã«ä»äžãããð
ç§ãããããåæ¥è«æã®å·çã«
åããããææããã£ãŠåããŸããð
äœäºãã¢ãŠããããåæã®ã€ã³ãããã
倧äºã§ãããšãnoteã§æ¯æ¥çºä¿¡ããŠããŸãã
ããã¯ãã©ã®ãããªå
容ã§
ãã£ãŠãåœãŠã¯ãŸããŸãð
è«æãäžæŠã«èªãã§ã
èšæ¶ã«æ®ã£ãŠããªãã£ãã
倧åãªèгç¹ãå¿ããŠããŸã£ãŠãããããã
åæ¥è«æã®é²æã¯æ»ã£ãŠããŸããšæããŸã
ã ããããããã®ãnoteãããã«æŽ»çšããŠ
åæ¥è«æã1ïŒ
ã§ã
宿ã«åããŠé²ããŠãããããšæããŸã
ç§ã®åè«å·çãžã®è»è·¡ã
ã©ãããæèªãã ããð
ä»åã®åèæç®ð
ä»åãèªã¿é²ããŠããè«æã¯
ãã¡ãã®URLã«ãªããŸãð
Effects of the Bank of Japanâs intervention on yen/dollar exchange rate volatility
Toshiaki Watanabe (a), Kimie Harada (b)
(a)Faculty of Economics, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami Ohsawa, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan
(b)Graduate School of International Accounting, Chuo University, 42-8 Honmura-cho, Ichigaya, Shinjuku, Tokyo 162-8473, Japan Received 18 September 2002; revised 13 February 2004 Available online 21 November 2004
ååã®å 容ð
ãæ¥æ¬ã®çºæ¿ä»å
¥ã®åæããäŒè€éæã»è
çµæžç ç©¶ãVol.54 No.2 Apr. 2003
Effects of the Bank of Japanâs intervention on yen/dollar exchange rate volatility
Watanabe, Toshiaki, and Harada, Kimie
1. Introduction
ãThis paper examines the effects of the Bank of Japanâs (BOJ) intervention on the behavior of the yen/dollar exchange rate.
Recent empirical studies on the effects of foreign exchange intervention by central banks have analyzed the effects of intervention on the volatility as well as the level of the exchange rate.
It is well known that exchange rate volatility changes randomly over time. Taking this fact into account, several researchers such as Chang and Taylor (1998) and Dominguez (1998) have employed the most widely used model of exchange rate volatility, the generalized autoregressive conditionally heteroskedastic (GARCH) model proposed by Bollerslev (1986) to investigate the effects of intervention.
In particular, Chang and Taylor (1998) and Dominguez (1998) introduce intervention variables as explanatory variables into the mean and volatility equations in the GARCH model.
ïŒèŠç¹æŽçïŒ
ãã®è«æã¯ãæ¥æ¬éè¡ã宿œããåãã«ãžã®çºæ¿ä»å
¥æ¿çã®å¹æã«ã€ããŠç ç©¶ããŠããŸã
æè¿ã®ç ç©¶ã§ã¯ãçºæ¿ã¬ãŒãã®æ°Žæºãšåããçºæ¿ã¬ãŒãã®ãã©ãã£ãªãã£ã«ã圱é¿ãäžãããšãããŠããŸã
ãã®å¹æãèšæž¬ããããã«å
è¡ç ç©¶Chang and Taylor (1998) and Dominguez (1998)ã§ãåãäžããããŠããGARCHã¢ãã«ãé§äœ¿ããŠåæããŠããŸã
ãThe use of a GARCH model, however, has an important drawback. It is the wellknown phenomenon called volatility clustering, that shocks to exchange rate volatility are highly persistent.
Incorporating intervention variables into the GARCH volatility equation is equivalent to assuming that the effects of intervention are also persistent.
If the effects of intervention on exchange rate volatility are transitory, this approach is not valid. In this paper, to overcome the problem, we use the component GARCH model proposed by Engle and Lee (1999).
This model assumes that the volatility consists of two components: one is the long-run volatility component whose shocks are highly persistent, and the other is the short-run volatility component whose shocks are less persistent.
By entering the intervention variables into both long-run and short-run volatility equations, we can capture the effects of intervention whether the effects are persistent or not.
ïŒèŠç¹æŽçïŒ
ãã ããGARCH ã¢ãã«ã®äœ¿çšã«ã¯éå€§ãªæ¬ ç¹ããããŸã
çºæ¿ã¬ãŒãã®ãã©ãã£ãªãã£ã«å¯Ÿããã·ã§ãã¯ã¯"ãã©ãã£ãªãã£ã»ã¯ã©ã¹ã¿ãªã³ã°"ãšåŒã°ããããç¥ãããçŸè±¡ã§ã
ããªãã¡ãéåžžã«æç¶æ§ãé«ãã®ã§ã
ä»å
¥å€æ°ãGARCH ãã©ãã£ãªãã£æ¹çšåŒã«çµã¿èŸŒãããšã¯ãããã¯ä»å
¥ã®å¹æãæç¶ãããšä»®å®ããã®ãšåãããšã«ãªããŸã
ãã广ãããã°çºæ¿ã¬ãŒãã®å€åã«å¯Ÿããä»å
¥ã¯äžæçãªãã®ã§ããããããã®ã¢ãããŒãã¯æå¹ã§ã¯ãããŸããðŠ
ãã®äžã§è«æã§ã¯ããã®åé¡ãå
æããããã«ãEngleããã³ãªãŒ (1999) ã«ãã£ãŠææ¡ãããã³ã³ããŒãã³ãGARCH ã¢ãã«ã䜿çšããŸãð
ãã®ã¢ãã«ã¯ããã©ãã£ãªãã£ã2 ã€ã®èŠçŽ ã§æ§æãããŠããããšãåæãšããŠããŸã
1ã€ã¯ã·ã§ãã¯ãéåžžã«æç¶ããé·æçãªãã©ãã£ãªãã£èŠçŽ ã§ã
ãã 1 ã€ã¯ã·ã§ãã¯ãããã»ã©æç¶ããªãçæçãªãã©ãã£ãªãã£èŠçŽ ã«ãªããŸãð
ä»å
¥å€æ°ãé·æãã©ãã£ãªãã£æ¹çšåŒãšçæãã©ãã£ãªãã£æ¹çšåŒã®äž¡æ¹ã«å
¥åããããšã§ãä»å
¥ã®å¹æã广ãæç¶ãããã©ãããšããããšã詳ããèå¯ããããšãã§ããããã«ãªããšããã®ã§ã
This paper is also different from previous studies in that we use the BOJâs official intervention data. Previous researchers used the BOJâs intervention data collected from the financial press because the official BOJâs intervention data was not available until July 2001.
1 Recently, some studies have examined the effects of intervention using the BOJâs official intervention data.
Ito (2002) examined the effects of the BOJâs intervention on the level of the yen/dollar exchange rate using the official intervention data.
Frenkel et al. (2003) investigate the accuracy of financial press reports of intervention, and find that they are inaccurate indicators of the actual level of intervention.
We examine the effects of intervention on the volatility as well as the level of the yen/dollar exchange rate using the official intervention data with a new methodological tool.
ïŒèŠç¹æŽçïŒ
ãã®è«æã¯ãæ¥éã®å
¬çä»å
¥ããŒã¿ã䜿çšããŠããç¹ã§ã以åã®ç ç©¶ãšã¯ç°ãªããŸãð
æ¥éã®å
ŒΊȌ
¥ããŒã¿ã¯ 2001 幎 7 æãŸã§å
¥æã§ããªãã£ãããããããŸã§ã®ç ç©¶è
ã¯éèå ±éæ©é¢ããåéããæ¥éã®ä»å
¥ããŒã¿ã䜿çšããŠããŸãã
ãã®è«æããéå»ã®ç ç©¶ãšç°ãªãç¹ã¯2ã€ãããŸã
â æè¿ãããã€ãã®ç ç©¶ã§ã¯æ¥éã®å
ŒΊȌ
¥ããŒã¿ã䜿çšããŠä»å
¥ã®å¹æã調æ»ããŠããããšã§ã
äŒè€ (2002) ã¯ãå
¬çä»å
¥ããŒã¿ã䜿çšããŠãå/ãã«çºæ¿ã¬ãŒãæ°Žæºã«å¯Ÿããæ¥éä»å
¥ã®åœ±é¿ãæ€èšŒããŸãã
ãã¬ã³ã±ã«ã(2003) ã¯ãä»å
¥ã«é¢ããéèå ±éã®æ£ç¢ºæ§ã調æ»ããŸãã
ãŸããããããå®éã®ä»å
¥ã¬ãã«ã瀺ãäžæ£ç¢ºãªææšã§ããããšãæããã«ããŸãã
ãã®å
è¡ç ç©¶ã§ã¯ãå/ãã«çºæ¿ã¬ãŒãã®ãã©ãã£ãªãã£ããã³ã¬ãã«ã«å¯Ÿããä»å
¥ã®åœ±é¿ããæ°ããæ¹æ³è«ããŒã«ã䜿çšããå
ŒΊȌ
¥ããŒã¿ãçšããŠåæããŠããç¹ã«åŠè¡çè²¢ç®ãããã®ã§ã
The main findings are as follows.
First, with respect to the effect of intervention on the level of the yen/dollar exchange rate, the GARCH and the component GARCH models lead to the same result, that the BOJâs intervention is effective in the second half of the sample period, from the late 1990s to 2003, and its effectiveness is enhanced by the Fedâs coordinated intervention.
However, the BOJâs intervention is not effective in the early 1990s. We identify new evidence on the effects of the BOJâs intervention on the yen/dollar exchange rate volatility based on the component GARCH model.
Second, the BOJâs intervention reduces the short-run volatility component in the second half of the sample period, while it does not have an impact on the volatility at all in the first half of the sample period.
Third, the stabilizing effect of the BOJâs intervention in the whole period is not enhanced by the Fedâs coordinated intervention.
ãã®è«æã«è¿°ã¹ãããŠããäž»ãªçµæã¯ä»¥äžã®éãã«ãªããŸã
第äžã«ãåãã«çžå Žæ°Žæºã«å¯Ÿããä»å
¥ã®å¹æã«ã€ããŠã¯ãGARCH ã¢ãã«ãšã³ã³ããŒãã³ã GARCHã¢ãã«ã¯ããµã³ãã«æéã®åŸåã«æ¥éã®ä»å
¥ã广çã§ãããšããåãçµæãå°ããŸã
1990幎代åŸåãã 2003幎ã«ãããŠãFRBã®å調ä»å
¥ã«ãã£ãŠãã®æå¹æ§ãé«ãŸããŸããð
ãããã1990幎代ååã«ã¯æ¥éã®ä»å
¥ã¯å¹æããããŸããã§ãã
ãã®ç ç©¶ãããã³ã³ããŒãã³ãGARCHã¢ãã«ã«åºã¥ããŠãå/ãã«çºæ¿ã¬ãŒãã®ãã©ãã£ãªãã£ã«å¯Ÿããæ¥éã®ä»å
¥ã®åœ±é¿ã«é¢ããæ°ããªèšŒæ ãç¹å®ãããšèšããŸã
第äºã«ãæ¥éã®ä»å
¥ã¯ãµã³ãã«æéã®åŸåã§çæãã©ãã£ãªãã£ã®ã³ã³ããŒãã³ããäœäžãããäžæ¹ã§ããµã³ãã«æéã®ååã§ã¯ãã©ãã£ãªãã£ã«ãŸã£ãã圱é¿ãäžããããšã¯ãããŸããã§ãã
第äžã«ããµã³ãã«æéå
šäœã«ãããæ¥éä»å
¥ã®å®å®å广ã¯ãFRBã®å調ä»å
¥ã«ãã£ãŠåŒ·åãããªãããšã«ãªããŸã
ãã®è«ææ§æã¯æ¬¡ã®ããã«ãªããŸã
ã»ã¯ã·ã§ã³ 2 ã§ã¯ããŒã¿ã«ã€ããŠèª¬æãããŠããŸãã
ã»ã¯ã·ã§ã³ 3ã§ã¯ãåŸæ¥ã®GARCHãçšããæ¥éä»å
¥ã®å¹æè©Šç®ãæç€ºã¢ãã«ã䜿çšããŠå®æœããŠãŸã
ã»ã¯ã·ã§ã³ 4 ã§ã¯ã³ã³ããŒãã³ã GARCHã䜿çšããå¹æã®æšå®å€ã瀺ããŠããŸãã
ãããŠãçµè«ã¯ã»ã¯ã·ã§ã³ 5 ã«ç€ºãããŠããŸã
ä»åŸãåã»ã¯ã·ã§ã³ããšãã£ããèªã¿èŸŒã¿ã¢ãŠãããããã§ããããã«åãçµãã§åããããšæããŸã
æ¬æ¥ã®è§£èª¬ã¯ããããŸã§ãšããŸã
ãã®ãããªæŽå²ãå
è¡ç ç©¶ããã£ããçè§£ããäžã§ãåæ¥è«æå·çã«åãçµãã§ããããã§ã
ä»åãç§ãåæ¥è«æå·çã«ãããŠåãäžãã
24幎ã¶ãã®ãå宿¯æ£ãä»å
¥ã¯æ¬åœã«ã¬ã¢ãªçµæžæ¿ç
ãšããããšãåèªèã§ãããããªæ°ãããŸãð
ç§ã®ç ç©¶ããŒãã«ã€ããŠð
ç§ã¯ãçºæ¿ä»å
¥ã®å®èšŒåæããããŒãã«
åæ¥è«æãå·çããããšèããŠããŸãð
æ¥æ¬çµæžãèãããšãã«ãçºæ¿ã¬ãŒãã«ãã£ãŠ
貿æååŒãçµåžžåæ¯ãå€åããã
æ ªã蚌åžã嵿š©ãšãã£ãéèè³ç£ã®åççã
å€åããããšæ¥æ¬çµæžãšçºæ¿ã¬ãŒããšã¯
åã£ãŠãåããªãçžãããã®ã§ãð
ïŒåðŽã ãã«ïœ¥ïœ¥ïœ¥ïŒ
çµæžã·ã§ãã¯ã«ãã£ãŠ
çºæ¿ã¬ãŒããå€åãããš
ãã®åœ±é¿ã¯ç§ãã¡ã®ç掻ã«å€§ãã圱é¿ããŸã
ã ãããããçºæ¿ã¬ãŒãã®å®å®æ§ã
æ
ä¿ãããããªçºæ¿ä»å
¥ã¯ãã¯ãçµæžæ¿çã«
ãããŠãéåžžã«éèŠãªæçŸ©ãæã£ãŠãããš
æšæž¬ããŠããŸã
決ããŠåŠéšçãæ¥œããŠå·çã§ãã
ç°¡åãªããŒããéžæããŠããããã§ã¯ç¡ããšä¿¡ããŠããŸã
ãã ããã®åæ¥è«æãããåãããšã
ç§ã®åŠççæŽ»ã®é倧æãšãªãããšã¯äºå®ãªã®ã§
æåŸãŸã§ã³ãã³ããšåãçµãã§åããŸãð¥
æ¬æ¥ã®è§£èª¬ã¯ã以äžãšããŸãð
ä»åŸãçµæžåŠçè«éãªãã³ã«
瀟äŒèª²é¡ã«å¯ŸããçµæžåŠçèŠç¹ã«ãã説æãªã©
ææçŸ©ãªå
容ãçºä¿¡ã§ããããã«
åªããŠãŸãããŸãã®ã§
ä»åŸãšãå®ãããé¡ãããŸãð¥º
ãã¬ãžã³ã®ã玹ä»ð
ãã¡ãã®ãã¬ãžã³ã«ãŠ
åæ¥è«æå·çãžã®è»è·¡
ãšãã»ã³ã·ã£ã«çµæžåŠçè«éããªãã³ã«
ãåœéçµæžåŠðãã®åºç€çè«ããŸãšããŠããŸã
ä»åŸãããã«ã³ã³ãã³ããæ¡å
ã§ããããã«åªããŠåããŸãã®ã§
ä»åŸãšãäœåãããããé¡ãç³ãäžããŸãð
æåŸãŸã§ãæèªããã ãèª ã«æé£ãããããŸããïŒ
ãããŸã§ãç§ã®èŠè§£ãæã£ãããšã
ãŸãšããããŠããã ããŠãŸãã
ãã®ç¹ã«é¢ããŸããŠããäºæ¿ãã ããð
ãã®æçš¿ãã¿ãŠãã ãã£ãæ¹ã
ã»ãã®å°ããªäºã§ãåŠã³ããã£ãïŒ
èãæ¹ã®åŒãåºããå¢ããïŒ
èªæžããåŠã¹ãããšãå€ãïŒ
ãªã©ãªã©ããã©ã¹ã®åç©«ããã£ãã®ã§ããã°
倧å€å¬ããæããŸãããæçš¿äœæã®å¥å©ã«å°œããŸãïŒïŒ
ãæ°è»œã«ã³ã¡ã³ããããããã¹ããð
ãããŠããå·®ãæ¯ããªããã°
ãã©ããŒïŒã·ã§ã¢ããé¡ããããã§ãð
ä»åŸãšãäœåãããããé¡ãããããŸãïŒ