
æ ¶æçŸ©å¡Ÿå€§åŠ SFC ç·åæ¿çåŠéš ç°å¢æ å ±åŠéš ïœè±èªé·æåé¡ åœ¢åŒåçŸå§çž®ããªã«ïŒ11åïŒ
æ¬ç©ã®è©Šéšã¯800ïœ1200èªã®è¶ é·æã§ããããã®ææã«ãããã£ãã¹ãã¬ã¹ã®å€§ããæŒç¿ã°ããã§ã¯ãããã«èŸããšæããŸããããã¯ãããªã¥ãŒã ã®ããåé¡ã§ã¹ã¿ãããã€ããã ãã§ã¯ãªãããã€ã³ããçµã£ãæŒç¿ã§ãåé¡ãèŠãç®ããé€ãããã®åé¡éã§ãã
ãããã400èªã»ã©ã®è±æã§ããããã¡ãâã§ç²Ÿå¯ã«åæããèšåã®è«ç¹ãšé£æåºŠãåæ ããŠããŸãã
䜿çšèªåœã¯è¥å¹²æ¬ç©ãããé«ãã«ãªã£ãŠããŠãããããªãåèªãããäžã§ããæããããã€ããã§æ£è§£ãéžã¶ãšãããçŽåæã«èº«ã«ã€ããã¹ãã¹ãã«ãæèããã¬ãã«ã«ãªã£ãŠããŸãã
èšåã¯8åãã€èšå®ããŠããããã®ææãªãã°ç©ºæéžæã¯4/5ãèªè§£åé¡ã¯3/3æ£è§£ããããšããã§ããåé¡ã«ãã£ãŠã¯ç©ºæéžæã§3/5ã蚱容ç¯å²ã§ãããŒã¿ã«ã§6/8ã®æ£è§£ãããŒãã§ãããªãæ¬çªã§ãååæŠããã§ãããã
æéã¯å¹³å10åãæé·ã§ã12åãé床ã§ãã11ååé²ãããŠãããã¡ã®1åãã以äžã«ãµã³ãã«ãšããŠæç€ºããŸãã
11
Language is frequently conceptualized as a transparent medium, a neutral conduit used to transfer thoughts from one mind to another with minimal distortion. We tend to operate under the assumption that words are arbitrary labels attached to fixed concepts, much like price tags on supermarket goods. We assume a straightforward mapping between the signifier and the signified, believing that communication is simply the exchange of these pre-packaged units. However, this utilitarian perspective ( ã1 ã) the profound depth of meaning inherent in the lexicon itself. Recent research in cognitive science and linguistics suggests that meaning is not merely attached to words as an afterthought but is, in a sense, "sunken" into them through centuries of usage.
Consider the word "home." To a dictionary, it is simply a place of residence. To a human mind, however, it triggers a cascade of sensory and emotional associationsâsecurity, family, the smell of cooking, or perhaps childhood trauma. This phenomenon, often referred to as semantic resonance, implies that words act less like passive containers and more like active triggers for complex cognitive simulations. The word serves as a handle for a vast reservoir of experiential data. When we engage in discourse, we are not just exchanging definitions; we are activating shared histories and cultural narratives that ( ã2ã ) beneath the surface of conscious awareness.
This "sunken" nature of meaning becomes particularly evident in the realm of translation. If words were simple equivalents, translation would be a mechanical process of substitution. Yet, anyone who has attempted to render poetry or complex prose from one tongue to another knows that this is (ã 3ã ) the case. A word in one language often carries historical baggage or emotional nuance that its nearest equivalent in another language lacks entirely. For instance, the Japanese concept of *mottainai* conveys a sense of regret concerning waste that is deeply rooted in Shinto beliefs about the spirit residing in objects, a nuance ( ã4ã ) absent in the English adjective "wasteful."
Therefore, to master a language is not merely to memorize vocabulary lists but to immerse oneself in the culture that breathed life into those words. We must recognize that our choice of terminology frames the way we perceive reality. In an increasingly globalized world, acknowledging this hidden weight of language is crucial for fostering true understanding. We must remain vigilant, lest we treat words as hollow shells when they are, in fact, ( ã5ã ) with the sediment of human experience. By ignoring this depth, we risk a superficial engagement with the world, reducing the rich tapestry of human thought to a flat exchange of data.
ã空æè£å
åé¡ã
[1] (1) validates (2) obscures (3) elucidates
[2] (1) reside (2) dissipate (3) ascend
[3] (1) far from (2) next to (3) consistent with
[4] (1) virtually (2) vaguely (3) partially
[5] (1) devoid (2) laden (3) incompatible
ãèªè§£åé¡ã
[1] According to the passage, why does the author mention the word "home"?
ã(1) To illustrate how dictionary definitions are often inaccurate compared to real-world usage. Â
ã(2) To demonstrate that words trigger complex emotional and sensory simulations beyond their literal meaning. Â
ã(3) To argue that the concept of residence is universal across all cultures and languages. Â
ã(4) To show that simple words are easier to translate than abstract concepts like "wasteful."
[2] What point does the author make using the example of the Japanese word *mottainai*?
ã(1) It proves that Japanese is a more expressive language than English in all respects. Â
ã(2) It highlights that religious concepts are impossible to translate into secular languages. Â
ã(3) It exemplifies how cultural history and beliefs are embedded in words, making direct translation difficult. Â
ã(4) It suggests that the English word "wasteful" should be replaced by *mottainai* in global communication.
[3] Which of the following best summarizes the main theme of the passage?
ã(1) Language is primarily a tool for efficient information transfer, functioning like price tags on goods. Â
ã(2) The difficulty of translation proves that true cross-cultural understanding is impossible to achieve. Â
ã(3) Words are not empty labels but carry deep, culturally sunken meanings that shape our perception of reality.Â
ã(4) Cognitive science has refuted the traditional view that vocabulary influences human thought processes.
11
ãè§£çãšè§£èª¬ã
--- æ¥æ¬èªå šèš³ ---
èšèªã¯ãã°ãã°ãããå¿ããå¥ã®å¿ãžãšãæªã¿ãæå°éã«æããŠæèã転éããããã®éæãªåªäœãããªãã¡äžç«çãªå°ç®¡ãšããŠæŠå¿µåãããŸããç§ãã¡ã¯ãèšèãšã¯ã¹ãŒããŒããŒã±ããã®ååã®å€æã®ããã«ãåºå®ãããæŠå¿µã«è²Œãä»ããããæ£æçãªã©ãã«ã§ãããšããåæã®äžã§è¡åããã¡ã§ããç§ãã¡ã¯ãèšå·è¡šçŸïŒã·ããã£ã¢ã³ïŒãšèšå·å 容ïŒã·ããã£ãšïŒã®éã«åçŽãªå¯Ÿå¿é¢ä¿ããããšä»®å®ããã³ãã¥ãã±ãŒã·ã§ã³ãšã¯åã«ãããã®ããã±ãŒãžåãããåäœã亀æããããšã ãšä¿¡ããŠããŸãããããããã®å®çšäž»çŸ©çãªèŠæ¹ã¯ãèªåœãã®ãã®ã«å åšããæå³ã®æ·±é ãªæ·±ããèŠãé ããŠããŸããŸããèªç¥ç§åŠãèšèªåŠã«ãããæè¿ã®ç ç©¶ã¯ãæå³ãšã¯åã«åŸä»ãã§èšèã«ä»çãããã®ã§ã¯ãªããäœäžçŽã«ãããã䜿çšãéããŠãããæå³ã§èšèã®äžã«ãæ²ã¿èŸŒãã§ãããããšã瀺åããŠããŸãã
ãå®¶ïŒhomeïŒããšããèšèãèããŠã¿ãŠãã ãããèŸæžã«ãšã£ãŠã¯ãããã¯åãªãå± äœã®å Žæã«éããŸããããããã人éã®å¿ã«ãšã£ãŠã¯ãããã¯æèŠçãã€ææ çãªé£æ³ã®é£éââå®å¿æãå®¶æãæçã®åãããããã¯åäŸæä»£ã®ãã©ãŠããªã©ââãåŒãèµ·ãããŸãããã°ãã°æå³çå ±é³ŽïŒsemantic resonanceïŒãšåŒã°ãããã®çŸè±¡ã¯ãèšèãååçãªå®¹åšãšããŠã§ã¯ãªããè€éãªèªç¥çã·ãã¥ã¬ãŒã·ã§ã³ã®ããã®èœåçãªããªã¬ãŒãšããŠæ©èœããããšã瀺åããŠããŸãããã®èšèã¯ãçµéšãšããèšå€§ãªæ°Žãæ±²ã¿äžããããã®åã£æãšããŠã®åœ¹å²ãæãããŸããç§ãã¡ã察話ãè¡ããšããç§ãã¡ã¯åã«å®çŸ©ã亀æããŠããã ãã§ã¯ãããŸãããç§ãã¡ã¯ãæèã®è¡šé¢äžã«ååšããå ±æãããæŽå²ãæåçç©èªã掻æ§åãããŠããã®ã§ãã
ãã®æå³ã®ãæ²ã¿èŸŒãã ãæ§è³ªã¯ã翻蚳ã®é åã«ãããŠç¹ã«é¡èã«ãªããŸããããèšèãåçŽãªç䟡ç©ã§ãããªãã°ãç¿»èš³ã¯æ©æ¢°çãªçœ®ãæãäœæ¥ã«ãªãã§ããããããããè©©ãè€éãªæ£æãããèšèªããå¥ã®èšèªãžãšç¿»èš³ããããšããããšã®ãã人ãªã誰ã§ãããããæ±ºããŠããã§ã¯ãªãããšãç¥ã£ãŠããŸããããèšèªã®èšèã¯ãå¥ã®èšèªã®æãè¿ãç䟡ç©ãå®å šã«æ¬ ããŠããæŽå²çãªéè·ãææ çãªãã¥ã¢ã³ã¹ã垯ã³ãŠããããšããããããŸããäŸãã°ãæ¥æ¬èªã®ããã£ãããªãããšããæŠå¿µã¯ãç©ã«éã宿ããšããç¥éã®ä¿¡ä»°ã«æ·±ãæ ¹ããããæµªè²»ã«å¯ŸããåŸæã®å¿µãäŒããŸããããã®ãã¥ã¢ã³ã¹ã¯è±èªã®åœ¢å®¹è© "wasteful" ã«ã¯å®è³ªçã«ååšããŸããã
ãããã£ãŠãèšèªãç¿åŸãããšããããšã¯ãåã«åèªãªã¹ããæèšããããšã§ã¯ãªãããããã®èšèã«åœãå¹ã蟌ãã æåã«æµžãããšãªã®ã§ããç§ãã¡ã¯ãçšèªã®éžæãç§ãã¡ã®çŸå®ã®èªèæ¹æ³ãæ äœã£ãŠããããšãèªèããªããã°ãªããŸããããŸããŸãã°ããŒãã«åããäžçã«ãããŠããã®é ãããèšèªã®éã¿ãèªããããšã¯ãçã®çè§£ãè²ãããã«äžå¯æ¬ ã§ããèšèã¯å®éã«ã¯äººéã®çµéšã®å ç©ç©ã§æºããããŠããã«ããããããããããã空èãªæ®»ãšããŠæ±ããªããããç§ãã¡ã¯çšå¿æ·±ããããã°ãªããŸããããã®æ·±ããç¡èŠããããšã§ãç§ãã¡ã¯äžçãšã®é¢ããã衚局çãªãã®ã«ãã人éã®æèãšããè±ããªã¿ãã¹ããªãŒããå¹³åŠãªããŒã¿ã®ããåããžãšè²¶ããŠããŸããªã¹ã¯ãåããŠããã®ã§ãã
--- 空æè£å ---
[1] è§£ç: (2) obscures
æ ¹æ : æèã¯ãèšèãåãªãã©ãã«ãšã¿ãªãå®çšçãªèŠæ¹ã¯ãèšèã«å åšããæ·±ãæå³ãèŠèœãšããŠããïŒé ããŠããïŒããšããæµãã§ãããããã£ãŠããèŠãé ããäžæçã«ããããšããæå³ãæã€ (2) obscures ãé©åã§ãã(1) validatesïŒæ£åœåããïŒã(3) elucidatesïŒè§£æããïŒã¯æèã«åããŸãã
[2] è§£ç: (1) reside
æ ¹æ : æèã®è¡šé¢äžã«ãååšããããããã¯ã宿ãããšãã衚çŸãé©åã§ãã(1) reside ã¯ãïŒæ§è³ªãªã©ãïŒåãã£ãŠãããååšããããšããæå³ã§ã"reside beneath the surface" ã®åœ¢ã§èªç¶ã«ã€ãªãããŸãã(2) dissipateïŒæ£éžããïŒã(3) ascendïŒäžæããïŒã¯äžé©åã§ãã
[3] è§£ç: (1) far from
æ ¹æ : åæã§ãç¿»èš³ãæ©æ¢°çãªçœ®ãæãã§ããã°ç°¡åã ãããšè¿°ã¹ãéæ¥ã® Yet ã§ã€ãªãã§ããŸããå®éã«ã¯ããã§ã¯ãªãïŒç¿»èš³ã¯é£ããïŒããšã匷調ããããããæ±ºããŠïœã§ã¯ãªãããæå³ãã (1) far from ãæ£è§£ã§ãã(2) next toïŒé£ã«ïŒã(3) consistent withïŒäžèŽããŠïŒã§ã¯ææãéããŸããã
[4] è§£ç: (1) virtually
æ ¹æ : ããã£ãããªããã«å«ãŸãã宿çã»æåçãªãã¥ã¢ã³ã¹ã¯ãè±èªã® "wasteful" ã«ã¯ãå®è³ªçã«ïŒã»ãšãã©ïŒååšããªãããšè¿°ã¹ãæèã§ãã(1) virtuallyïŒå®è³ªçã«ãã»ãšãã©ïŒãæé©ã§ãã(2) vaguelyïŒãããŸãã«ïŒã(3) partiallyïŒéšåçã«ïŒã§ã¯ããã¥ã¢ã³ã¹ã®æ¬ èœã®æ±ºå®çãªéãã匷調ã§ããŸããã
[5] è§£ç: (2) laden
æ ¹æ : èšèã¯ç©ºèãªæ®»ïŒhollow shellsïŒã§ã¯ãªãã人éã®çµéšã®å ç©ç©ã§ãæºããããŠããïŒéè·ãè² ã£ãŠããïŒããšããå¯Ÿæ¯æ§é ã§ãã(2) ladenïŒïœãç©ãã ãïœã§æºã¡ãïŒã be laden with ã®åœ¢ã§æèã«åèŽããŸãã(1) devoidïŒæ¬ ããŠããïŒã¯éã®æå³ã«ãªãã(3) incompatibleïŒççŸããïŒã¯æèã«åããŸããã
--- èªè§£åé¡ ---
[1] è§£ç: (2) To demonstrate that words trigger complex emotional and sensory simulations beyond their literal meaning.
解説: 第2段èœã§èè ã¯ãèŸæžçãªå®çŸ©ïŒå± äœå°ïŒãšäººéã®å¿ã«ãããåå¿ïŒå®å¿æãå®¶æãåããªã©ïŒã察æ¯ãããŠããŸããããã¯ãèšèãåãªã容åšã§ã¯ãªããè€éãªèªç¥çã·ãã¥ã¬ãŒã·ã§ã³ã®ããªã¬ãŒã§ããããšã瀺ãããã§ãããããã£ãŠã(2) ãæ£è§£ã§ãã
[2] è§£ç: (3) It exemplifies how cultural history and beliefs are embedded in words, making direct translation difficult.
解説: 第3段èœã§ *mottainai* ã¯ãç¥éã®ä¿¡å¿µã«æ ¹ãããç²Ÿç¥æ§ãå«ããããè±èªã® "wasteful" ã§ã¯ãã®ãã¥ã¢ã³ã¹ãå®å šã«ã¯æããããªãäŸãšããŠæããããŠããŸããããã¯èšèã«æåçèæ¯ããæ²ã¿èŸŒãã§ïŒsunkenïŒãããããšã瀺ããŠããŸãããã£ãŠ (3) ãæ£è§£ã§ãã
[3] è§£ç: (3) Words are not empty labels but carry deep, culturally sunken meanings that shape our perception of reality.
解説: æ¬æå šäœãéããŠãèšèã¯åãªãã©ãã«ïŒéæãªåªäœïŒã§ã¯ãªããæŽå²ãæåãææ ããæ²ã¿èŸŒãã ïŒsunkenïŒããã®ã§ããããããæã ã®çŸå®èªèã圢æããŠãããšè«ããŠããŸãããããã£ãŠã(3) ãæãé©åãªèŠçŽã§ãã(1) ã¯èè ãåŠå®ããŠããèŠè§£ã§ããã(2) ã¯æ²èгçãããŸãïŒèè ã¯çè§£ã®ããã«ãã®éã¿ãèªèãã¹ããšè¿°ã¹ãŠããŸãïŒã
以äžã®åèªãšåé¡èšèšææ³ããæå³çã«åæ ãããŠããŸãã
ååŠéšã¯ãã¡ãâ