Actually the fastest way to run your GitHub Actions.
Migrate today
No credit card required.
Also an observable, drop-in replacement for GitHub runners
Interactive demo for sighted users: a GitHub pull request changes the workflow's runs-on to a Namespace runner profile. On the conversation page Namespace connects to the repository, a reviewer notes CI is twice as fast and costs half as much, the four checks pass on Namespace runners, and the Merge button unlocks. Merging starts the main branch's CI, which finishes in 4 minutes 56 seconds on Namespace against 9 minutes 52 seconds on GitHub-hosted runners. The window sits on a subtle off-white texture.
It's not even close.
Highest single-core performance
across Mac, Windows, and Linux
Bar chart of amd64 single-core performance scores (higher is better): Namespace scores highest at 4566, 1.9x higher than GitHub (2416) and 2.1x higher than AWS CodeBuild (2143).
| Provider | Single-core performance score, higher is better |
|---|---|
| Namespace | 4566 |
| GitHub | 2416 |
| AWS CodeBuild | 2143 |
The fastest step is the one you skip.
Cache dependencies, docker layers, a mirror of your git repository, and much more.
All the data your developers and
agents look for.
The results speak for themselves.
How Warp runs everything from CI to Oz, their cloud agent platform, on Namespace
20k
Sandboxes per month
4x
Faster Github Actions
Customer story
“Namespace is the best dev infrastructure tool I’ve used in years. We run everything from our CI to Oz, our cloud agent platform, on Namespace, and I could not recommend it enough.”
Aloke Desai
Head of Product Engineering, Warp
