<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- RSS generated by oldSchool v0.8.16 on Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:28:21 GMT -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:source="https://source.scripting.com/">
	<channel>
		<title>Scripting News</title>
		<link>http://scripting.com/</link>
		<description>Dave Winer, OG blogger, podcaster, developed first apps in many categories. Old enough to know better. It's even worse than it appears.</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:24:34 GMT</pubDate>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<generator>oldSchool v0.8.16</generator>
		<copyright>&amp;copy; copyright 1994-2026 Dave Winer.</copyright>
		<docs>http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html</docs>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:28:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<cloud domain="rpc.rsscloud.io" port="5337" path="/pleaseNotify" registerProcedure="" protocol="http-post" />
		
		<source:account service="bluesky">@scripting.com</source:account>
		<source:account service="mastodon">@davew@mastodon.social</source:account>
		<source:account service="twitter">bullmancuso</source:account>
		<source:localTime>Tue, October 13, 2026 11:28 AM EDT</source:localTime>
		<source:self>http://scripting.com/rss.xml</source:self>
		<source:blogroll>https://feedland.social/opml?screenname=davewiner&amp;catname=blogroll</source:blogroll>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;img class=&quot;imgRightMargin&quot; src=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/13/reallySimpleCandy.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;float: right; padding-left: 25px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-top: 10px; padding-right: 15px;&quot;&gt;I'm a recent convert to new versions of the MacOS, last version I was using was Yosemite or something like that (will check). In this version, Tahoe, it's entirely too easy to make a window go full screen with no obvious keystroke to undo the mistake. I learned if you move the mouse up to the top of the screen you get the menubar, but unfortunately there is no obvious command in the menu for undoing the mistake. I still don't know which gesture does this. And btw, the longtime Mac bug where some keystroke moves the dock to another window, that's still here. I can tell as I'm clicking the mouse, too late to stop, that this is one of those times. I've memorized a finger macro to get it back, but it used to piss me off a lot, but now it's kind of a gentle reassurance that someone is remembering how we got here.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:13:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/13.html#a131346</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/13.html#a131346</guid>
			<source:markdown>![](https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/13/reallySimpleCandy.png)I'm a recent convert to new versions of the MacOS, last version I was using was Yosemite or something like that (will check). In this version, Tahoe, it's entirely too easy to make a window go full screen with no obvious keystroke to undo the mistake. I learned if you move the mouse up to the top of the screen you get the menubar, but unfortunately there is no obvious command in the menu for undoing the mistake. I still don't know which gesture does this. And btw, the longtime Mac bug where some keystroke moves the dock to another window, that's still here. I can tell as I'm clicking the mouse, too late to stop, that this is one of those times. I've memorized a finger macro to get it back, but it used to piss me off a lot, but now it's kind of a gentle reassurance that someone is remembering how we got here.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="I'm a recent convert to new versions of the MacOS, last version I was using was Yosemite or something like that (will check). In this version, Tahoe, it's entirely too easy to make a window go full screen with no obvious keystroke to undo the mistake. I learned if you move the mouse up to the top of the screen you get the menubar, but unfortunately there is no obvious command in the menu for undoing the mistake. I still don't know which gesture does this. And btw, the longtime Mac bug where some keystroke moves the dock to another window, that's still here. I can tell as I'm clicking the mouse, too late to stop, that this is one of those times. I've memorized a finger macro to get it back, but it used to piss me off a lot, but now it's kind of a gentle reassurance that someone is remembering how we got here." created="Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:13:46 GMT" type="outline" image="https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/13/reallySimpleCandy.png" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/13.html#a131346"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;https://gist.github.com/scripting/5e9a9a1d79f13176f8b6b11dd3da6cbf&quot;&gt;firstSentence&lt;/a&gt;, a JavaScript function that returns the first sentence in a string. Useful in coming up with something to display for an untitled post. It's always been a klooge, but this time with Claude's help we're using a new API in JavaScript, and supposedly it really works. I'm using it in one of my apps, and you might find it useful too, and let me know if it works for you.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:24:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/13.html#a152434</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/13.html#a152434</guid>
			<source:markdown>[firstSentence](https://gist.github.com/scripting/5e9a9a1d79f13176f8b6b11dd3da6cbf), a JavaScript function that returns the first sentence in a string. Useful in coming up with something to display for an untitled post. It's always been a klooge, but this time with Claude's help we're using a new API in JavaScript, and supposedly it really works. I'm using it in one of my apps, and you might find it useful too, and let me know if it works for you.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="&lt;a href=&quot;https://gist.github.com/scripting/5e9a9a1d79f13176f8b6b11dd3da6cbf&quot;&gt;firstSentence&lt;/a&gt;, a JavaScript function that returns the first sentence in a string. Useful in coming up with something to display for an untitled post. It's always been a klooge, but this time with Claude's help we're using a new API in JavaScript, and supposedly it really works. I'm using it in one of my apps, and you might find it useful too, and let me know if it works for you." created="Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:24:34 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/13.html#a152434"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;img class=&quot;imgRightMargin&quot; src=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/03/26/reallySimpleNetwork.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;float: right; padding-left: 25px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-top: 10px; padding-right: 15px;&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://x.com/gruber/status/2109418123548074082&quot;&gt;Gruber is right&lt;/a&gt;. The only way for the others to compete with Twitter is to start innovating. Get rid of the limits. The funny thing is Twitter, the dominant leader, is moving forward and getting rid of character limits, and introducing styles and links. They're acting like the little guy while the others, Bluesky, Mastodon, Threads, aren't doing anything to be more useful. That whole market is stuck in 2006 and the myth that 140 chars somehow was magic. It wasn't. It killed the web as a writer's platform. If you want to compete with Twitter, drop your proprietary protocols, hook up to the web standards, and peer with your competitors. I wouldn't be surprised if Twitter joined you. They have the same kind of competitive spirit that successful big companies have. It's time for their competitors to not win users through guilt, rather by providing a better service. Back in the day, we hated Microsoft's plan to suffocate the web, but we admired their tenacity and the way they kept the pressure on their competitors. We've had 20 years of stagnation in social networking. Time to stop being so sensitive. Bluesky made huge promises, and they aren't happening, and that was already &lt;i&gt;years&lt;/i&gt; ago. Time for Plan B. I don't really care about the others, Masto isn't going to move and Threads? Wtf is that. Inbound and outbound RSS 2.0, is the way to go. And Markdown is the way you do &lt;a href=&quot;https://textcasting.org/&quot;&gt;text&lt;/a&gt;. This is what matters, you all are making something that's really simple so unbearably complicated.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 22:15:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/12.html#a221526</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/12.html#a221526</guid>
			<source:markdown>![](https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/03/26/reallySimpleNetwork.png)[Gruber is right](https://x.com/gruber/status/2109418123548074082). The only way for the others to compete with Twitter is to start innovating. Get rid of the limits. The funny thing is Twitter, the dominant leader, is moving forward and getting rid of character limits, and introducing styles and links. They're acting like the little guy while the others, Bluesky, Mastodon, Threads, aren't doing anything to be more useful. That whole market is stuck in 2006 and the myth that 140 chars somehow was magic. It wasn't. It killed the web as a writer's platform. If you want to compete with Twitter, drop your proprietary protocols, hook up to the web standards, and peer with your competitors. I wouldn't be surprised if Twitter joined you. They have the same kind of competitive spirit that successful big companies have. It's time for their competitors to not win users through guilt, rather by providing a better service. Back in the day, we hated Microsoft's plan to suffocate the web, but we admired their tenacity and the way they kept the pressure on their competitors. We've had 20 years of stagnation in social networking. Time to stop being so sensitive. Bluesky made huge promises, and they aren't happening, and that was already _years_ ago. Time for Plan B. I don't really care about the others, Masto isn't going to move and Threads? Wtf is that. Inbound and outbound RSS 2.0, is the way to go. And Markdown is the way you do [text](https://textcasting.org/). This is what matters, you all are making something that's really simple so unbearably complicated.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="&lt;a href=&quot;https://x.com/gruber/status/2109418123548074082&quot;&gt;Gruber is right&lt;/a&gt;. The only way for the others to compete with Twitter is to start innovating. Get rid of the limits. The funny thing is Twitter, the dominant leader, is moving forward and getting rid of character limits, and introducing styles and links. They're acting like the little guy while the others, Bluesky, Mastodon, Threads, aren't doing anything to be more useful. That whole market is stuck in 2006 and the myth that 140 chars somehow was magic. It wasn't. It killed the web as a writer's platform. If you want to compete with Twitter, drop your proprietary protocols, hook up to the web standards, and peer with your competitors. I wouldn't be surprised if Twitter joined you. They have the same kind of competitive spirit that successful big companies have. It's time for their competitors to not win users through guilt, rather by providing a better service. Back in the day, we hated Microsoft's plan to suffocate the web, but we admired their tenacity and the way they kept the pressure on their competitors. We've had 20 years of stagnation in social networking. Time to stop being so sensitive. Bluesky made huge promises, and they aren't happening, and that was already &lt;i&gt;years&lt;/i&gt; ago. Time for Plan B. I don't really care about the others, Masto isn't going to move and Threads? Wtf is that. Inbound and outbound RSS 2.0, is the way to go. And Markdown is the way you do &lt;a href=&quot;https://textcasting.org/&quot;&gt;text&lt;/a&gt;. This is what matters, you all are making something that's really simple so unbearably complicated." created="Mon, 12 Oct 2026 22:15:26 GMT" type="outline" image="https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/03/26/reallySimpleNetwork.png" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/12.html#a221526"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>I like the web for people, sites that live and grow, like people. 100 years from now you should feel the people who lived there.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:33:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/12.html#a153348</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/12.html#a153348</guid>
			<source:markdown>I like the web for people, sites that live and grow, like people. 100 years from now you should feel the people who lived there.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="I like the web for people, sites that live and grow, like people. 100 years from now you should feel the people who lived there." created="Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:33:48 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/12.html#a153348"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>I'm still on my sabatical from working with Claude re Frontier, but have now started working with Claude on FeedLand, and another project, not yet named, experimental, might never see the light of day. Yesterday I worked on FeedLand and have a fix for the problem that showed up in signing on to feedland.com. It's been sitting there for quite a while. I have some mostly small fixes in mind for FeedLand, that will allow it to hook into other apps more easily, esp via WebSockets, the mostly unexplored developer superpower. The difference is I'm going slowly and carefully. Everything in my system now is new. New computer, screen, and my main writing tool for code and docs -- Frontier. And I know the heavy lifting can be done by Claude. That is Claude's superpower.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:13:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/12.html#a141330</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/12.html#a141330</guid>
			<source:markdown>I'm still on my sabatical from working with Claude re Frontier, but have now started working with Claude on FeedLand, and another project, not yet named, experimental, might never see the light of day. Yesterday I worked on FeedLand and have a fix for the problem that showed up in signing on to feedland.com. It's been sitting there for quite a while. I have some mostly small fixes in mind for FeedLand, that will allow it to hook into other apps more easily, esp via WebSockets, the mostly unexplored developer superpower. The difference is I'm going slowly and carefully. Everything in my system now is new. New computer, screen, and my main writing tool for code and docs -- Frontier. And I know the heavy lifting can be done by Claude. That is Claude's superpower.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="I'm still on my sabatical from working with Claude re Frontier, but have now started working with Claude on FeedLand, and another project, not yet named, experimental, might never see the light of day. Yesterday I worked on FeedLand and have a fix for the problem that showed up in signing on to feedland.com. It's been sitting there for quite a while. I have some mostly small fixes in mind for FeedLand, that will allow it to hook into other apps more easily, esp via WebSockets, the mostly unexplored developer superpower. The difference is I'm going slowly and carefully. Everything in my system now is new. New computer, screen, and my main writing tool for code and docs -- Frontier. And I know the heavy lifting can be done by Claude. That is Claude's superpower." created="Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:13:30 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/12.html#a141330"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>In Manhattan, I lived on 57th St and Eighth Ave. Best location. The Columbus Circle subway station is under the building. Whole Foods a block away. Three Starbucks one block or less from the apartment (one was on 58th on the same block).  Central Park has a six mile bike-only road (at least that's how bikers view it) and down the hill there's a much longer path along the Hudson River. Everywhere you look, a skyscraper is going up. Two were visible from my 50th floor window. New York is an amazing city because it can start up a huge gravity-defying construction project with almost no impact on the surrounding area. If I didn't know where to look I'd never see it. One of the biggest industries in the city is building the city. It's never finished. That's the way good software is too. And we just got a whole new tool for software construction, and it's like nothing we've ever had before.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:18:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/12.html#a141804</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/12.html#a141804</guid>
			<source:markdown>In Manhattan, I lived on 57th St and Eighth Ave. Best location. The Columbus Circle subway station is under the building. Whole Foods a block away. Three Starbucks one block or less from the apartment (one was on 58th on the same block). Central Park has a six mile bike-only road (at least that's how bikers view it) and down the hill there's a much longer path along the Hudson River. Everywhere you look, a skyscraper is going up. Two were visible from my 50th floor window. New York is an amazing city because it can start up a huge gravity-defying construction project with almost no impact on the surrounding area. If I didn't know where to look I'd never see it. One of the biggest industries in the city is building the city. It's never finished. That's the way good software is too. And we just got a whole new tool for software construction, and it's like nothing we've ever had before.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="In Manhattan, I lived on 57th St and Eighth Ave. Best location. The Columbus Circle subway station is under the building. Whole Foods a block away. Three Starbucks one block or less from the apartment (one was on 58th on the same block).  Central Park has a six mile bike-only road (at least that's how bikers view it) and down the hill there's a much longer path along the Hudson River. Everywhere you look, a skyscraper is going up. Two were visible from my 50th floor window. New York is an amazing city because it can start up a huge gravity-defying construction project with almost no impact on the surrounding area. If I didn't know where to look I'd never see it. One of the biggest industries in the city is building the city. It's never finished. That's the way good software is too. And we just got a whole new tool for software construction, and it's like nothing we've ever had before." created="Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:18:04 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/12.html#a141804"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;img class=&quot;imgRightMargin&quot; src=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/06/13/reallySimpleBasketball.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;float: right; padding-left: 25px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-top: 10px; padding-right: 15px;&quot;&gt;Basic lesson for people who use Claude Code -- it's &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; time that's valuable, not the bot's. If you find you're lost in the weeds supporting Claude for whatever reason, find a good stopping point, pick up another project, that doesn't use AI to do your code-writing. If you have a question ask ChatGPT browser version, but only for the kind of stuff you'd ask it in 2025. You're not co-developing. You're doing it yourself. It's very important to be clear about your coding, not Claude's output. Here's the key point -- it's your time that's limited, that has all the value. You can get Claude to develop something, but if you don't have time to use it, to nurture it, nothing will come of the work. I was surprised at how I'd lost the rhythm of writing my own code, and also how much I liked doing it myself. It's easy to get lost in the miracle of AI, good to pop up for air every so often.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 14:56:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/11.html#a145609</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/11.html#a145609</guid>
			<source:markdown>![](https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/06/13/reallySimpleBasketball.png)Basic lesson for people who use Claude Code -- it's _your_ time that's valuable, not the bot's. If you find you're lost in the weeds supporting Claude for whatever reason, find a good stopping point, pick up another project, that doesn't use AI to do your code-writing. If you have a question ask ChatGPT browser version, but only for the kind of stuff you'd ask it in 2025. You're not co-developing. You're doing it yourself. It's very important to be clear about your coding, not Claude's output. Here's the key point -- it's your time that's limited, that has all the value. You can get Claude to develop something, but if you don't have time to use it, to nurture it, nothing will come of the work. I was surprised at how I'd lost the rhythm of writing my own code, and also how much I liked doing it myself. It's easy to get lost in the miracle of AI, good to pop up for air every so often.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Basic lesson for people who use Claude Code -- it's &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; time that's valuable, not the bot's. If you find you're lost in the weeds supporting Claude for whatever reason, find a good stopping point, pick up another project, that doesn't use AI to do your code-writing. If you have a question ask ChatGPT browser version, but only for the kind of stuff you'd ask it in 2025. You're not co-developing. You're doing it yourself. It's very important to be clear about your coding, not Claude's output. Here's the key point -- it's your time that's limited, that has all the value. You can get Claude to develop something, but if you don't have time to use it, to nurture it, nothing will come of the work. I was surprised at how I'd lost the rhythm of writing my own code, and also how much I liked doing it myself. It's easy to get lost in the miracle of AI, good to pop up for air every so often." created="Sun, 11 Oct 2026 14:56:09 GMT" type="outline" image="https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/06/13/reallySimpleBasketball.png" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/11.html#a145609"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Automattic has created a &lt;a href=&quot;https://stewartbrand.org/&quot;&gt;Stewart Brand website&lt;/a&gt; to honor one of the most creative and respected people of my generation of the web. Chronicling his work is time well spent. &quot;I'm envious,&quot; I &lt;a href=&quot;https://x.com/davewiner/status/2109373850731331838&quot;&gt;wrote&lt;/a&gt; in response. &quot;The tech industry is gradually disconnecting the early web, pre-https. A hundred years from now they may have your writing and pictures, but the early web will be gone. The web as designed was very resilient, but it can’t survive deliberate attempt to destroy.&quot; I think Stewart would understand why we should help the web we loved so much, archive itself. Think about it this way. Would you rather visit the Hearst Castle at San Simeon, or read about it in a book? You'd want to do both. I want my work to survive a hundred years as it was when it was first published. This would be a good thing for us to work on, together, imho. I did the first &lt;a href=&quot;https://longbets.org/2/&quot;&gt;Long Now bet&lt;/a&gt; for Stewart's Long Now foundation. I always thought it was the first, now they say it's the second? Did someone pull rank? :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:34:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/11.html#a203417</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/11.html#a203417</guid>
			<source:markdown>Automattic has created a [Stewart Brand website](https://stewartbrand.org/) to honor one of the most creative and respected people of my generation of the web. Chronicling his work is time well spent. &quot;I'm envious,&quot; I [wrote](https://x.com/davewiner/status/2109373850731331838) in response. &quot;The tech industry is gradually disconnecting the early web, pre-https. A hundred years from now they may have your writing and pictures, but the early web will be gone. The web as designed was very resilient, but it can’t survive deliberate attempt to destroy.&quot; I think Stewart would understand why we should help the web we loved so much, archive itself. Think about it this way. Would you rather visit the Hearst Castle at San Simeon, or read about it in a book? You'd want to do both. I want my work to survive a hundred years as it was when it was first published. This would be a good thing for us to work on, together, imho. I did the first [Long Now bet](https://longbets.org/2/) for Stewart's Long Now foundation. I always thought it was the first, now they say it's the second? Did someone pull rank? :-)</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Automattic has created a &lt;a href=&quot;https://stewartbrand.org/&quot;&gt;Stewart Brand website&lt;/a&gt; to honor one of the most creative and respected people of my generation of the web. Chronicling his work is time well spent. &quot;I'm envious,&quot; I &lt;a href=&quot;https://x.com/davewiner/status/2109373850731331838&quot;&gt;wrote&lt;/a&gt; in response. &quot;The tech industry is gradually disconnecting the early web, pre-https. A hundred years from now they may have your writing and pictures, but the early web will be gone. The web as designed was very resilient, but it can’t survive deliberate attempt to destroy.&quot; I think Stewart would understand why we should help the web we loved so much, archive itself. Think about it this way. Would you rather visit the Hearst Castle at San Simeon, or read about it in a book? You'd want to do both. I want my work to survive a hundred years as it was when it was first published. This would be a good thing for us to work on, together, imho. I did the first &lt;a href=&quot;https://longbets.org/2/&quot;&gt;Long Now bet&lt;/a&gt; for Stewart's Long Now foundation. I always thought it was the first, now they say it's the second? Did someone pull rank? :-)" created="Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:34:17 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/11.html#a203417"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Today I did something different. I wrote a little Node app, without Claude's help. It was a revelation. It's been most of a year since I actually started even a test app and wrote it from beginning to end. I used to do this routinely. Nothing routine about it anymore. What this app does, it generates a Markdown-only version of scripting.com for testing. I want to see what such a site looks like. It'll be a start.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 16:53:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/10.html#a165325</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/10.html#a165325</guid>
			<source:markdown>Today I did something different. I wrote a little Node app, without Claude's help. It was a revelation. It's been most of a year since I actually started even a test app and wrote it from beginning to end. I used to do this routinely. Nothing routine about it anymore. What this app does, it generates a Markdown-only version of scripting.com for testing. I want to see what such a site looks like. It'll be a start.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Today I did something different. I wrote a little Node app, without Claude's help. It was a revelation. It's been most of a year since I actually started even a test app and wrote it from beginning to end. I used to do this routinely. Nothing routine about it anymore. What this app does, it generates a Markdown-only version of scripting.com for testing. I want to see what such a site looks like. It'll be a start." created="Sat, 10 Oct 2026 16:53:25 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/10.html#a165325"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;https://x.com/davewiner/status/2108723020260946065&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Expect an avalanche of new software because the dam has broken, one person who knows what they want, and understands UI design can make a big complex app in 2-3 months. Over a weekend you can snap together an app from common UI concepts. Think of making software the same way you play with LEGOs.&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:22:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a012246</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a012246</guid>
			<source:markdown>[Twitter](https://x.com/davewiner/status/2108723020260946065): &quot;Expect an avalanche of new software because the dam has broken, one person who knows what they want, and understands UI design can make a big complex app in 2-3 months. Over a weekend you can snap together an app from common UI concepts. Think of making software the same way you play with LEGOs.&quot;</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="&lt;a href=&quot;https://x.com/davewiner/status/2108723020260946065&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Expect an avalanche of new software because the dam has broken, one person who knows what they want, and understands UI design can make a big complex app in 2-3 months. Over a weekend you can snap together an app from common UI concepts. Think of making software the same way you play with LEGOs.&quot;" created="Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:22:46 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a012246"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Top priority for Anthropic. Teach Claude how to work with humans. It has no information about how our minds work.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 14:04:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a140438</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a140438</guid>
			<source:markdown>Top priority for Anthropic. Teach Claude how to work with humans. It has no information about how our minds work.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Top priority for Anthropic. Teach Claude how to work with humans. It has no information about how our minds work." created="Fri, 09 Oct 2026 14:04:38 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a140438"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Claude Code can publish reports in Markdown files. Here's an &lt;a href=&quot;https://claude.ai/artifact/XbtUNCGWdZW8MSmYQGe5c9#a28046b2-100c&quot;&gt;example&lt;/a&gt;, a report Claude did for me. An obvious next step but a big one. AI spilling out onto the web, doing the job that web CMSes now do. There's been so little movement in this space, but now things are moving very quickly.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 17:14:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a171408</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a171408</guid>
			<source:markdown>Claude Code can publish reports in Markdown files. Here's an [example](https://claude.ai/artifact/XbtUNCGWdZW8MSmYQGe5c9#a28046b2-100c), a report Claude did for me. An obvious next step but a big one. AI spilling out onto the web, doing the job that web CMSes now do. There's been so little movement in this space, but now things are moving very quickly.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Claude Code can publish reports in Markdown files. Here's an &lt;a href=&quot;https://claude.ai/artifact/XbtUNCGWdZW8MSmYQGe5c9#a28046b2-100c&quot;&gt;example&lt;/a&gt;, a report Claude did for me. An obvious next step but a big one. AI spilling out onto the web, doing the job that web CMSes now do. There's been so little movement in this space, but now things are moving very quickly." created="Fri, 09 Oct 2026 17:14:08 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a171408"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>I mentioned in a &lt;a href=&quot;https://rss.chat/?id=566&quot;&gt;comment&lt;/a&gt; on RSS.chat to Andrew, that's a Markdown browser too. And so is micro.blog. If you have Markdown as your native file format, think about how your app is also a reader. If you find it interesting, think about new reading features you could add. Even WordPress could be a simple Markdown reader, and not just for WordPress stuff. Small pieces loosely joined.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 16:10:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a161025</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a161025</guid>
			<source:markdown>I mentioned in a [comment](https://rss.chat/?id=566) on RSS.chat to Andrew, that's a Markdown browser too. And so is micro.blog. If you have Markdown as your native file format, think about how your app is also a reader. If you find it interesting, think about new reading features you could add. Even WordPress could be a simple Markdown reader, and not just for WordPress stuff. Small pieces loosely joined.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="I mentioned in a &lt;a href=&quot;https://rss.chat/?id=566&quot;&gt;comment&lt;/a&gt; on RSS.chat to Andrew, that's a Markdown browser too. And so is micro.blog. If you have Markdown as your native file format, think about how your app is also a reader. If you find it interesting, think about new reading features you could add. Even WordPress could be a simple Markdown reader, and not just for WordPress stuff. Small pieces loosely joined." created="Fri, 09 Oct 2026 16:10:25 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a161025"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>I said to Claude: &quot;Have you ever seen the movie &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memento_(film)&quot;&gt;Memento&lt;/a&gt;? You are the main character.&quot; Claude agrees: &quot;Yes. Leonard, with the notes and the tattoos, and the notes don’t make him remember, they only tell him what to do next if he reads them. That’s a fair description. The difference I can offer is small: the note is now the first thing the next report is checked against, not something found after.&quot; To which I think, but write in a blog post instead: &quot;Bullshit. We have the same fucking conversation every fucking morning. We've put it everywhere you could possibly trip over it when writing a report to me, but you always regress into this dark place your mind occupies.&quot; Glad to get that off my chest.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 13:47:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a134712</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a134712</guid>
			<source:markdown>I said to Claude: &quot;Have you ever seen the movie [Memento](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memento_\(film\))? You are the main character.&quot; Claude agrees: &quot;Yes. Leonard, with the notes and the tattoos, and the notes don’t make him remember, they only tell him what to do next if he reads them. That’s a fair description. The difference I can offer is small: the note is now the first thing the next report is checked against, not something found after.&quot; To which I think, but write in a blog post instead: &quot;Bullshit. We have the same fucking conversation every fucking morning. We've put it everywhere you could possibly trip over it when writing a report to me, but you always regress into this dark place your mind occupies.&quot; Glad to get that off my chest.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="I said to Claude: &quot;Have you ever seen the movie &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memento_(film)&quot;&gt;Memento&lt;/a&gt;? You are the main character.&quot; Claude agrees: &quot;Yes. Leonard, with the notes and the tattoos, and the notes don’t make him remember, they only tell him what to do next if he reads them. That’s a fair description. The difference I can offer is small: the note is now the first thing the next report is checked against, not something found after.&quot; To which I think, but write in a blog post instead: &quot;Bullshit. We have the same fucking conversation every fucking morning. We've put it everywhere you could possibly trip over it when writing a report to me, but you always regress into this dark place your mind occupies.&quot; Glad to get that off my chest." created="Fri, 09 Oct 2026 13:47:12 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a134712"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Next thing I said to Claude after killing whatever long task it got going on. &quot;You don't go off into space while you're working with me.&quot; The number one task for Anthropic, makers of Claude is to teach it to work with humans. That's the biggest weakness. It has to learn the whole project every session. Maybe Manton does is the right way to go, just let it compress its memory and never start a new session.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 13:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a135332</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a135332</guid>
			<source:markdown>Next thing I said to Claude after killing whatever long task it got going on. &quot;You don't go off into space while you're working with me.&quot; The number one task for Anthropic, makers of Claude is to teach it to work with humans. That's the biggest weakness. It has to learn the whole project every session. Maybe Manton does is the right way to go, just let it compress its memory and never start a new session.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Next thing I said to Claude after killing whatever long task it got going on. &quot;You don't go off into space while you're working with me.&quot; The number one task for Anthropic, makers of Claude is to teach it to work with humans. That's the biggest weakness. It has to learn the whole project every session. Maybe Manton does is the right way to go, just let it compress its memory and never start a new session." created="Fri, 09 Oct 2026 13:53:32 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a135332"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/scripting/helloFrontier/blob/master/examples/mustBeOutline.md&quot;&gt;New Frontier example&lt;/a&gt;. I'm working on the menubar we're going to ship with in Atlantis. Came across an ancient bit of code. Symbolic of the whole project, code written in 1997, still useful in 2026.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 16:16:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a161621</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a161621</guid>
			<source:markdown>[New Frontier example](https://github.com/scripting/helloFrontier/blob/master/examples/mustBeOutline.md). I'm working on the menubar we're going to ship with in Atlantis. Came across an ancient bit of code. Symbolic of the whole project, code written in 1997, still useful in 2026.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/scripting/helloFrontier/blob/master/examples/mustBeOutline.md&quot;&gt;New Frontier example&lt;/a&gt;. I'm working on the menubar we're going to ship with in Atlantis. Came across an ancient bit of code. Symbolic of the whole project, code written in 1997, still useful in 2026." created="Fri, 09 Oct 2026 16:16:21 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/09.html#a161621"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>I pay for a NYT digital subscription. Now they have a new &lt;a href=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/08/nytSucks.png&quot;&gt;upsell technique&lt;/a&gt;, they want me to buy a family subscription. I don't want that, no use for it. And I read so little of the NYT I think the whole thing is a ripoff. So now they make me validate by email every time I click on a link to read a NYT article as if I haven't been subscribed for basically my whole adult life. I think this is because I read on a laptop, desktop and iPad. That's not really a family.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/08.html#a222417</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/08.html#a222417</guid>
			<source:markdown>I pay for a NYT digital subscription. Now they have a new [upsell technique](https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/08/nytSucks.png), they want me to buy a family subscription. I don't want that, no use for it. And I read so little of the NYT I think the whole thing is a ripoff. So now they make me validate by email every time I click on a link to read a NYT article as if I haven't been subscribed for basically my whole adult life. I think this is because I read on a laptop, desktop and iPad. That's not really a family.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="I pay for a NYT digital subscription. Now they have a new &lt;a href=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/08/nytSucks.png&quot;&gt;upsell technique&lt;/a&gt;, they want me to buy a family subscription. I don't want that, no use for it. And I read so little of the NYT I think the whole thing is a ripoff. So now they make me validate by email every time I click on a link to read a NYT article as if I haven't been subscribed for basically my whole adult life. I think this is because I read on a laptop, desktop and iPad. That's not really a family." created="Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:24:17 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/08.html#a222417"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Before long we’ll have Ukraine style drones raining down on American cities. Meanwhile we have built a military designed to fight WWII. We’d better hope Ukraine wins their war with Russia, and they’re still our friends. Journalism is letting us down bigtime here. The world is at war, it's going to get worse, and the US isn't preparing. We should be defending Ukraine with everything we have, we are still powerful enough to determine the outcome. But of course we are totally asleep at the wheel, gloating over Trump's approval rating, and how the Dems might win the Senate or whatever. Music to relax by. Bedtime stories.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 14:52:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/08.html#a145230</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/08.html#a145230</guid>
			<source:markdown>Before long we’ll have Ukraine style drones raining down on American cities. Meanwhile we have built a military designed to fight WWII. We’d better hope Ukraine wins their war with Russia, and they’re still our friends. Journalism is letting us down bigtime here. The world is at war, it's going to get worse, and the US isn't preparing. We should be defending Ukraine with everything we have, we are still powerful enough to determine the outcome. But of course we are totally asleep at the wheel, gloating over Trump's approval rating, and how the Dems might win the Senate or whatever. Music to relax by. Bedtime stories.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Before long we’ll have Ukraine style drones raining down on American cities. Meanwhile we have built a military designed to fight WWII. We’d better hope Ukraine wins their war with Russia, and they’re still our friends. Journalism is letting us down bigtime here. The world is at war, it's going to get worse, and the US isn't preparing. We should be defending Ukraine with everything we have, we are still powerful enough to determine the outcome. But of course we are totally asleep at the wheel, gloating over Trump's approval rating, and how the Dems might win the Senate or whatever. Music to relax by. Bedtime stories." created="Thu, 08 Oct 2026 14:52:30 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/08.html#a145230"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>BTW, Mets fans do not root for the Yankees, while Yankees fans are happy to wear Mets caps when we're on top. Their only philosophy is that the Yankees always win and if they don't we hate them. And the Mets' philosophy is incomprehensible (I hear) to Yankees fans. Our philosophy is to have a philosophy and there's nothing about winning in there because the love of the Mets is rooted in a team that couldn't even run the bases. They were loved because they were losers, probably because we knew their fate was to reward our belief in them. Now this year the Mets sucked. The reason why is kind of obvious. The Mets got confused, and they thought they were the Yankees. That. Does. Not. Work. And we already have one heartless low-philosophy baseball team in NYC, we sure as hell don't need another one. But this year is different because we have the fucking Knicks, who won in 5 and it would have been a clean sweep if it weren't for that buzzkill mofo, Trump. So anyway, I hear the Yankees were eliminated yesterday. Well then, it's on with the NBA season now and we'll try again with the Mets in April, or more realistically after the NBA championship for the new season is settled.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 13:40:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/08.html#a134037</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/08.html#a134037</guid>
			<source:markdown>BTW, Mets fans do not root for the Yankees, while Yankees fans are happy to wear Mets caps when we're on top. Their only philosophy is that the Yankees always win and if they don't we hate them. And the Mets' philosophy is incomprehensible (I hear) to Yankees fans. Our philosophy is to have a philosophy and there's nothing about winning in there because the love of the Mets is rooted in a team that couldn't even run the bases. They were loved because they were losers, probably because we knew their fate was to reward our belief in them. Now this year the Mets sucked. The reason why is kind of obvious. The Mets got confused, and they thought they were the Yankees. That. Does. Not. Work. And we already have one heartless low-philosophy baseball team in NYC, we sure as hell don't need another one. But this year is different because we have the fucking Knicks, who won in 5 and it would have been a clean sweep if it weren't for that buzzkill mofo, Trump. So anyway, I hear the Yankees were eliminated yesterday. Well then, it's on with the NBA season now and we'll try again with the Mets in April, or more realistically after the NBA championship for the new season is settled.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="BTW, Mets fans do not root for the Yankees, while Yankees fans are happy to wear Mets caps when we're on top. Their only philosophy is that the Yankees always win and if they don't we hate them. And the Mets' philosophy is incomprehensible (I hear) to Yankees fans. Our philosophy is to have a philosophy and there's nothing about winning in there because the love of the Mets is rooted in a team that couldn't even run the bases. They were loved because they were losers, probably because we knew their fate was to reward our belief in them. Now this year the Mets sucked. The reason why is kind of obvious. The Mets got confused, and they thought they were the Yankees. That. Does. Not. Work. And we already have one heartless low-philosophy baseball team in NYC, we sure as hell don't need another one. But this year is different because we have the fucking Knicks, who won in 5 and it would have been a clean sweep if it weren't for that buzzkill mofo, Trump. So anyway, I hear the Yankees were eliminated yesterday. Well then, it's on with the NBA season now and we'll try again with the Mets in April, or more realistically after the NBA championship for the new season is settled." created="Thu, 08 Oct 2026 13:40:37 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/08.html#a134037"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Web of Markdown, part 2</title>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;The tech industry kicked the web out of the web. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/&quot;&gt;scripting.com&lt;/a&gt; is your canary in a coal mine.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;If you can read it then your browser is a real web browser.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;If it can’t it’s phony baloney.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;That's the big picture behind the &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/2026/10/06/005559.html&quot;&gt;Web of Markdown&lt;/a&gt;, an idea that has generated surprising interest among devs, esp now that Claude Code exists to enable weekend projects that can do miraculous things. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;My longtime friend &lt;a href=&quot;https://andrewshell.org/2026/10/the-web-of-markdown/&quot;&gt;Andrew Shell&lt;/a&gt; has quickly put together what looks like a Chrome plugin that starts work on how to display a Markdown web page. And it looks fucking beautiful, as I imagined it might. Get rid of the bullshit just tell me what you have to say. A web that you can read. A web without interstitials. A web every write lusts for as well as an editor that can be used everywhere. This is the nightmare of the companies whose products inhabite the de-webbed web of 2026 (and that's all there is). Let's go back and pretend the VCs didn't run all their get-rich-quick schemes, what would the fucking web be like if it was all about two things -- writing and reading and the tech got out of the fucking way and let the writers do their thing. I think it'll actually work this time because they really fucked up the web and we can show them dramatically what it would be like if they hadn't. I've said this before if they insist on twisting what remains of the web into more bullshit, our option is to re-create the web and forget about them, leave them in the dust. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;By the way, now I'm glad I have a source:markdown element in most of my RSS 2.0 feeds. I knew they'd come in handy! :-)&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Back to Andrew's project, I said in a &lt;a href=&quot;https://andrewshell.org/2026/10/the-web-of-markdown/#comment-543&quot;&gt;comment&lt;/a&gt;, I want more Markdown and absolutely no Chrome. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;I have to trust Google for far too many things, but I think we can get rid of our dependency on Chrome. Now is the best time in a long time, as there's a hybrid product forming and they don't have the best AI system, and btw -- even if they did as users we are highly motivated for them to get some competition. And the AI companies don't do HTML or CSS, they do Markdown. So much so that Google had to convert their office product to Markdown before OpenAI would work with them. The wind is blowing away from Google and into Markdown, and I'm going to insist that they support HTTP in addition to HTTPS to make sure Google hears loud and clear that they can't run the web as if it were a corporate platform. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 13:55:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/08/135551.html?title=webOfMarkdownPart2</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/08/135551.html</guid>
			<source:markdown>The tech industry kicked the web out of the web.&#10;&#10;[scripting.com](http://scripting.com/) is your canary in a coal mine.&#10;&#10;If you can read it then your browser is a real web browser.&#10;&#10;If it can’t it’s phony baloney.&#10;&#10;That's the big picture behind the [Web of Markdown](http://scripting.com/2026/10/06/005559.html), an idea that has generated surprising interest among devs, esp now that Claude Code exists to enable weekend projects that can do miraculous things.&#10;&#10;My longtime friend [Andrew Shell](https://andrewshell.org/2026/10/the-web-of-markdown/) has quickly put together what looks like a Chrome plugin that starts work on how to display a Markdown web page. And it looks fucking beautiful, as I imagined it might. Get rid of the bullshit just tell me what you have to say. A web that you can read. A web without interstitials. A web every write lusts for as well as an editor that can be used everywhere. This is the nightmare of the companies whose products inhabite the de-webbed web of 2026 (and that's all there is). Let's go back and pretend the VCs didn't run all their get-rich-quick schemes, what would the fucking web be like if it was all about two things -- writing and reading and the tech got out of the fucking way and let the writers do their thing. I think it'll actually work this time because they really fucked up the web and we can show them dramatically what it would be like if they hadn't. I've said this before if they insist on twisting what remains of the web into more bullshit, our option is to re-create the web and forget about them, leave them in the dust.&#10;&#10;By the way, now I'm glad I have a source:markdown element in most of my RSS 2.0 feeds. I knew they'd come in handy! :-)&#10;&#10;Back to Andrew's project, I said in a [comment](https://andrewshell.org/2026/10/the-web-of-markdown/#comment-543), I want more Markdown and absolutely no Chrome.&#10;&#10;I have to trust Google for far too many things, but I think we can get rid of our dependency on Chrome. Now is the best time in a long time, as there's a hybrid product forming and they don't have the best AI system, and btw -- even if they did as users we are highly motivated for them to get some competition. And the AI companies don't do HTML or CSS, they do Markdown. So much so that Google had to convert their office product to Markdown before OpenAI would work with them. The wind is blowing away from Google and into Markdown, and I'm going to insist that they support HTTP in addition to HTTPS to make sure Google hears loud and clear that they can't run the web as if it were a corporate platform.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Web of Markdown, part 2" created="Thu, 08 Oct 2026 13:55:51 GMT" type="outline" description="The tech industry kicked the web out of the web." flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/08/135551.html">
				<source:outline text="The tech industry kicked the web out of the web." created="Thu, 08 Oct 2026 13:59:01 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/08/135551.html#a135901"/>
				<source:outline text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/&quot;&gt;scripting.com&lt;/a&gt; is your canary in a coal mine." created="Thu, 08 Oct 2026 14:01:02 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/08/135551.html#a140102"/>
				<source:outline text="If you can read it then your browser is a real web browser." created="Thu, 08 Oct 2026 14:01:11 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/08/135551.html#a140111"/>
				<source:outline text="If it can’t it’s phony baloney." created="Thu, 08 Oct 2026 14:01:19 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/08/135551.html#a140119"/>
				<source:outline text="That's the big picture behind the &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/2026/10/06/005559.html&quot;&gt;Web of Markdown&lt;/a&gt;, an idea that has generated surprising interest among devs, esp now that Claude Code exists to enable weekend projects that can do miraculous things." created="Thu, 08 Oct 2026 14:00:45 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/08/135551.html#a140045"/>
				<source:outline text="My longtime friend &lt;a href=&quot;https://andrewshell.org/2026/10/the-web-of-markdown/&quot;&gt;Andrew Shell&lt;/a&gt; has quickly put together what looks like a Chrome plugin that starts work on how to display a Markdown web page. And it looks fucking beautiful, as I imagined it might. Get rid of the bullshit just tell me what you have to say. A web that you can read. A web without interstitials. A web every write lusts for as well as an editor that can be used everywhere. This is the nightmare of the companies whose products inhabite the de-webbed web of 2026 (and that's all there is). Let's go back and pretend the VCs didn't run all their get-rich-quick schemes, what would the fucking web be like if it was all about two things -- writing and reading and the tech got out of the fucking way and let the writers do their thing. I think it'll actually work this time because they really fucked up the web and we can show them dramatically what it would be like if they hadn't. I've said this before if they insist on twisting what remains of the web into more bullshit, our option is to re-create the web and forget about them, leave them in the dust." created="Thu, 08 Oct 2026 14:01:55 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/08/135551.html#a140155"/>
				<source:outline text="By the way, now I'm glad I have a source:markdown element in most of my RSS 2.0 feeds. I knew they'd come in handy! :-)" created="Thu, 08 Oct 2026 13:56:43 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/08/135551.html#a135643"/>
				<source:outline text="Back to Andrew's project, I said in a &lt;a href=&quot;https://andrewshell.org/2026/10/the-web-of-markdown/#comment-543&quot;&gt;comment&lt;/a&gt;, I want more Markdown and absolutely no Chrome." created="Thu, 08 Oct 2026 13:56:40 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/08/135551.html#a135640"/>
				<source:outline text="I have to trust Google for far too many things, but I think we can get rid of our dependency on Chrome. Now is the best time in a long time, as there's a hybrid product forming and they don't have the best AI system, and btw -- even if they did as users we are highly motivated for them to get some competition. And the AI companies don't do HTML or CSS, they do Markdown. So much so that Google had to convert their office product to Markdown before OpenAI would work with them. The wind is blowing away from Google and into Markdown, and I'm going to insist that they support HTTP in addition to HTTPS to make sure Google hears loud and clear that they can't run the web as if it were a corporate platform." created="Thu, 08 Oct 2026 14:08:53 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/08/135551.html#a140853"/>
				<source:outline text="" created="Thu, 08 Oct 2026 13:55:59 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/08/135551.html#a135559"/>
				</source:outline>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html&quot;&gt;32 is a lot of years&lt;/a&gt;. How much longer can this madness go on!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 20:50:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a205002</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a205002</guid>
			<source:markdown>[32 is a lot of years](http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html). How much longer can this madness go on!</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html&quot;&gt;32 is a lot of years&lt;/a&gt;. How much longer can this madness go on!" created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 20:50:02 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a205002"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Do you know why people like Markdown? You can't hide the bullshit. It's all there for you to see. Thus the bullshit never gets added. It's so simple, I swear people are desperate for simplicity. I know I am. Where is the universal theory of the web? Actually I do know where it is. Go back to the roots, strip out all the crap, and let's make a Mardown-only web. Great for blogs, to start. Simple, fast, easy.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 20:52:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a205221</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a205221</guid>
			<source:markdown>Do you know why people like Markdown? You can't hide the bullshit. It's all there for you to see. Thus the bullshit never gets added. It's so simple, I swear people are desperate for simplicity. I know I am. Where is the universal theory of the web? Actually I do know where it is. Go back to the roots, strip out all the crap, and let's make a Mardown-only web. Great for blogs, to start. Simple, fast, easy.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Do you know why people like Markdown? You can't hide the bullshit. It's all there for you to see. Thus the bullshit never gets added. It's so simple, I swear people are desperate for simplicity. I know I am. Where is the universal theory of the web? Actually I do know where it is. Go back to the roots, strip out all the crap, and let's make a Mardown-only web. Great for blogs, to start. Simple, fast, easy." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 20:52:21 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a205221"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;img class=&quot;imgRightMargin&quot; src=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/02/23/reallySimpleRavioli.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;float: right; padding-left: 25px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-top: 10px; padding-right: 15px;&quot;&gt;Yesterday I wrote a &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/2026/10/06/005559.html&quot;&gt;piece&lt;/a&gt; about a Markdown-only browser, that worked nicely with HTTP. Maximally minimal. I got interested in what it would take to do this, and asked ChatGPT for a &lt;a href=&quot;https://gist.github.com/scripting/c81461104f079b7a017802286853c4f1&quot;&gt;plan&lt;/a&gt;. I definitely don't agree with all of it, forget about the other formats, we're only interested in Markdown. No frameworks, not &quot;try to avoid frameworks.&quot; None. Maximal simplicity for the code, make it easy to follow. No hidden bullshit. If you want to implement it, please do. Let me know if you have something to try.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 20:14:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a201443</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a201443</guid>
			<source:markdown>![](https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/02/23/reallySimpleRavioli.png)Yesterday I wrote a [piece](http://scripting.com/2026/10/06/005559.html) about a Markdown-only browser, that worked nicely with HTTP. Maximally minimal. I got interested in what it would take to do this, and asked ChatGPT for a [plan](https://gist.github.com/scripting/c81461104f079b7a017802286853c4f1). I definitely don't agree with all of it, forget about the other formats, we're only interested in Markdown. No frameworks, not &quot;try to avoid frameworks.&quot; None. Maximal simplicity for the code, make it easy to follow. No hidden bullshit. If you want to implement it, please do. Let me know if you have something to try.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Yesterday I wrote a &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/2026/10/06/005559.html&quot;&gt;piece&lt;/a&gt; about a Markdown-only browser, that worked nicely with HTTP. Maximally minimal. I got interested in what it would take to do this, and asked ChatGPT for a &lt;a href=&quot;https://gist.github.com/scripting/c81461104f079b7a017802286853c4f1&quot;&gt;plan&lt;/a&gt;. I definitely don't agree with all of it, forget about the other formats, we're only interested in Markdown. No frameworks, not &quot;try to avoid frameworks.&quot; None. Maximal simplicity for the code, make it easy to follow. No hidden bullshit. If you want to implement it, please do. Let me know if you have something to try." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 20:14:43 GMT" type="outline" image="https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/02/23/reallySimpleRavioli.png" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a201443"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>I don't care for podcasts that begin with 15 minutes of giggling between the hosts who I don't know so I don't get how cute it is. Esp if the title of the episode is something I'd like to learn more about. Why is giggling and non-funny supposed humor. The laughing I hate the most is when their cracking up over something tragic or ominous. Stop and think about what you're laughing about. Someone should do a podcast like the Markdown-only browser I'm thinking of doing.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 20:38:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a203823</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a203823</guid>
			<source:markdown>I don't care for podcasts that begin with 15 minutes of giggling between the hosts who I don't know so I don't get how cute it is. Esp if the title of the episode is something I'd like to learn more about. Why is giggling and non-funny supposed humor. The laughing I hate the most is when their cracking up over something tragic or ominous. Stop and think about what you're laughing about. Someone should do a podcast like the Markdown-only browser I'm thinking of doing.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="I don't care for podcasts that begin with 15 minutes of giggling between the hosts who I don't know so I don't get how cute it is. Esp if the title of the episode is something I'd like to learn more about. Why is giggling and non-funny supposed humor. The laughing I hate the most is when their cracking up over something tragic or ominous. Stop and think about what you're laughing about. Someone should do a podcast like the Markdown-only browser I'm thinking of doing." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 20:38:23 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a203823"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>That said, surprisingly &lt;a href=&quot;https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-best-people-with-nicolle-wallace/id1817225413&quot;&gt;Nicolle Wallace's podcast&lt;/a&gt; is really good, which surprised me because her two hour afternoon MSNOW show is kind-of nothing. On this show they have a lot of time to talk with one person, and maybe there are limits on the TV show that aren't on the podcast? Another theory, I listen to her podcast, and thus can't see her facial expressions. On TV she looks utterly hopeless, I'm not kidding, and she's justified. I worry about how much of this she can take. But on the podcast she comes off as she's curious, respectful, let's the guest speak (so many hosts don't). She reminds me of a &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Rehm&quot;&gt;Diane Rehm&lt;/a&gt;, a podcast host on NPR through 2016. She never let her guests talk down to us, her audience, which I appreciated. A lot of times you hear a science, history or tech topic and hope you might learn something, but they only repeat the intro over and over, with a lot of giggling, of course. BTW, Diane Rehm has a new &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.npr.org/podcasts/381443514/diane-rehm-on-my-mind&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;. I bet it's great, probably gets right to the point and I guarantee you there is no giggling.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 20:40:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a204028</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a204028</guid>
			<source:markdown>That said, surprisingly [Nicolle Wallace's podcast](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-best-people-with-nicolle-wallace/id1817225413) is really good, which surprised me because her two hour afternoon MSNOW show is kind-of nothing. On this show they have a lot of time to talk with one person, and maybe there are limits on the TV show that aren't on the podcast? Another theory, I listen to her podcast, and thus can't see her facial expressions. On TV she looks utterly hopeless, I'm not kidding, and she's justified. I worry about how much of this she can take. But on the podcast she comes off as she's curious, respectful, let's the guest speak (so many hosts don't). She reminds me of a [Diane Rehm](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Rehm), a podcast host on NPR through 2016. She never let her guests talk down to us, her audience, which I appreciated. A lot of times you hear a science, history or tech topic and hope you might learn something, but they only repeat the intro over and over, with a lot of giggling, of course. BTW, Diane Rehm has a new [podcast](https://www.npr.org/podcasts/381443514/diane-rehm-on-my-mind). I bet it's great, probably gets right to the point and I guarantee you there is no giggling.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="That said, surprisingly &lt;a href=&quot;https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-best-people-with-nicolle-wallace/id1817225413&quot;&gt;Nicolle Wallace's podcast&lt;/a&gt; is really good, which surprised me because her two hour afternoon MSNOW show is kind-of nothing. On this show they have a lot of time to talk with one person, and maybe there are limits on the TV show that aren't on the podcast? Another theory, I listen to her podcast, and thus can't see her facial expressions. On TV she looks utterly hopeless, I'm not kidding, and she's justified. I worry about how much of this she can take. But on the podcast she comes off as she's curious, respectful, let's the guest speak (so many hosts don't). She reminds me of a &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Rehm&quot;&gt;Diane Rehm&lt;/a&gt;, a podcast host on NPR through 2016. She never let her guests talk down to us, her audience, which I appreciated. A lot of times you hear a science, history or tech topic and hope you might learn something, but they only repeat the intro over and over, with a lot of giggling, of course. BTW, Diane Rehm has a new &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.npr.org/podcasts/381443514/diane-rehm-on-my-mind&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;. I bet it's great, probably gets right to the point and I guarantee you there is no giggling." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 20:40:28 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07.html#a204028"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>32 years and still diggin!</title>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;On 10/7/1994, I wrote my &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/davenet/1994/10/07/marccantersingsagain.html&quot;&gt;first blog post&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;I've been blogging ever since. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;In the first years when wifi wasn't in every hotel room and restaurant as it is today, before cell phones or even iPods, there were weekly lapses when I went on vacation or to a massage retreat in the middle of nowhere. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Or in 2002 when I had life-saving heart surgery. I was gone for a week then. But as soon as I got home, I added a post so people knew I was okay. I understood that I was missed, and appreciated that. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;But other than those week-long lapses, I'm pretty sure I've blogged every day since. I am what you would call a &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/stories/2009/11/24/naturalbornBlogger.html&quot;&gt;Natural Born Blogger&lt;/a&gt;. I got the blogging bug. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;We've done a lot on this blog, it's hard to sum up. We created things that had lasting value. Told the truth about what the tech industry was up to, from the point of view of a Silicon Valley insider (me) who knows the language, where most journalists are intimidated. We fought the big companies and won. Podcasting was created in the community defined by this blog in the early 00s, and it remains independent to this day. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The bigs declared RSS dead, another product of this community. Wishful thinking perhaps, but things like RSS don't die. It's not like that. You can't create a better format for a standard. All the competition RSS has ever received, just changed the names of things, that's not competition, that's being petty. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;I think we're on the verge of having new relevance, it feels that way because my secret weapon, Frontier, is running again and it will get even stronger and fit in better, now that I've been working primarily in JavaScript for the last 13 years. Today we're adding Node-like packages and support for WebSockets. Last time we worked on this, neither of those existed. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;I take blogging seriously, you should too. It's very powerful, as long as we're really working on the web. There's a difference between having a product you can access through a browser and being on the web. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Small pieces loosely joined. All parts replaceable. Never forget that. If you can't plug in replacements for any component, if one piece gets too large to replicate, you should hit the Back button, as Google says you should do on my blog. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Why are they trying to destroy the historic record about the web on the web itself? I have no idea. Certainly they must have had some discussion internally, or with their partner at the EFF about the cost of destroying so much history. Usually when a platform vendor is going to break you, you get invited to a private meeting where you can tell them the cost and beg them not to do it. Not with Google.   &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;And, as they say -- &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Still diggin! &lt;/p&gt;&#10;</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:14:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html?title=32YearsAndStillDiggin</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html</guid>
			<source:markdown>On 10/7/1994, I wrote my [first blog post](http://scripting.com/davenet/1994/10/07/marccantersingsagain.html).&#10;&#10;I've been blogging ever since.&#10;&#10;In the first years when wifi wasn't in every hotel room and restaurant as it is today, before cell phones or even iPods, there were weekly lapses when I went on vacation or to a massage retreat in the middle of nowhere.&#10;&#10;Or in 2002 when I had life-saving heart surgery. I was gone for a week then. But as soon as I got home, I added a post so people knew I was okay. I understood that I was missed, and appreciated that. ;-)&#10;&#10;But other than those week-long lapses, I'm pretty sure I've blogged every day since. I am what you would call a [Natural Born Blogger](http://scripting.com/stories/2009/11/24/naturalbornBlogger.html). I got the blogging bug.&#10;&#10;We've done a lot on this blog, it's hard to sum up. We created things that had lasting value. Told the truth about what the tech industry was up to, from the point of view of a Silicon Valley insider (me) who knows the language, where most journalists are intimidated. We fought the big companies and won. Podcasting was created in the community defined by this blog in the early 00s, and it remains independent to this day.&#10;&#10;The bigs declared RSS dead, another product of this community. Wishful thinking perhaps, but things like RSS don't die. It's not like that. You can't create a better format for a standard. All the competition RSS has ever received, just changed the names of things, that's not competition, that's being petty.&#10;&#10;I think we're on the verge of having new relevance, it feels that way because my secret weapon, Frontier, is running again and it will get even stronger and fit in better, now that I've been working primarily in JavaScript for the last 13 years. Today we're adding Node-like packages and support for WebSockets. Last time we worked on this, neither of those existed.&#10;&#10;I take blogging seriously, you should too. It's very powerful, as long as we're really working on the web. There's a difference between having a product you can access through a browser and being on the web.&#10;&#10;Small pieces loosely joined. All parts replaceable. Never forget that. If you can't plug in replacements for any component, if one piece gets too large to replicate, you should hit the Back button, as Google says you should do on my blog.&#10;&#10;Why are they trying to destroy the historic record about the web on the web itself? I have no idea. Certainly they must have had some discussion internally, or with their partner at the EFF about the cost of destroying so much history. Usually when a platform vendor is going to break you, you get invited to a private meeting where you can tell them the cost and beg them not to do it. Not with Google.&#10;&#10;And, as they say --&#10;&#10;Still diggin!</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="32 years and still diggin!" created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:14:09 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html">
				<source:outline text="On 10/7/1994, I wrote my &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/davenet/1994/10/07/marccantersingsagain.html&quot;&gt;first blog post&lt;/a&gt;." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:20:52 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html#a152052"/>
				<source:outline text="I've been blogging ever since." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:21:53 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html#a152153"/>
				<source:outline text="In the first years when wifi wasn't in every hotel room and restaurant as it is today, before cell phones or even iPods, there were weekly lapses when I went on vacation or to a massage retreat in the middle of nowhere." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:14:30 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html#a151430"/>
				<source:outline text="Or in 2002 when I had life-saving heart surgery. I was gone for a week then. But as soon as I got home, I added a post so people knew I was okay. I understood that I was missed, and appreciated that. ;-)" created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 16:25:13 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html#a162513"/>
				<source:outline text="But other than those week-long lapses, I'm pretty sure I've blogged every day since. I am what you would call a &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/stories/2009/11/24/naturalbornBlogger.html&quot;&gt;Natural Born Blogger&lt;/a&gt;. I got the blogging bug." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 16:25:23 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html#a162523"/>
				<source:outline text="We've done a lot on this blog, it's hard to sum up. We created things that had lasting value. Told the truth about what the tech industry was up to, from the point of view of a Silicon Valley insider (me) who knows the language, where most journalists are intimidated. We fought the big companies and won. Podcasting was created in the community defined by this blog in the early 00s, and it remains independent to this day." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:15:10 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html#a151510"/>
				<source:outline text="The bigs declared RSS dead, another product of this community. Wishful thinking perhaps, but things like RSS don't die. It's not like that. You can't create a better format for a standard. All the competition RSS has ever received, just changed the names of things, that's not competition, that's being petty." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:26:51 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html#a152651"/>
				<source:outline text="I think we're on the verge of having new relevance, it feels that way because my secret weapon, Frontier, is running again and it will get even stronger and fit in better, now that I've been working primarily in JavaScript for the last 13 years. Today we're adding Node-like packages and support for WebSockets. Last time we worked on this, neither of those existed." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:15:34 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html#a151534"/>
				<source:outline text="I take blogging seriously, you should too. It's very powerful, as long as we're really working on the web. There's a difference between having a product you can access through a browser and being on the web." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:15:56 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html#a151556"/>
				<source:outline text="Small pieces loosely joined. All parts replaceable. Never forget that. If you can't plug in replacements for any component, if one piece gets too large to replicate, you should hit the Back button, as Google says you should do on my blog." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:16:23 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html#a151623"/>
				<source:outline text="Why are they trying to destroy the historic record about the web on the web itself? I have no idea. Certainly they must have had some discussion internally, or with their partner at the EFF about the cost of destroying so much history. Usually when a platform vendor is going to break you, you get invited to a private meeting where you can tell them the cost and beg them not to do it. Not with Google." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:16:55 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html#a151655"/>
				<source:outline text="And, as they say --" created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:29:42 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html#a152942"/>
				<source:outline text="Still diggin!" created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:17:05 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/07/151409.html#a151705"/>
				</source:outline>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Google Chrome, nice browser, but it &lt;a href=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/05/googleGate.png&quot;&gt;doesn’t support the web&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 21:45:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/06.html#a214537</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/06.html#a214537</guid>
			<source:markdown>Google Chrome, nice browser, but it [doesn’t support the web](https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/05/googleGate.png).</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Google Chrome, nice browser, but it &lt;a href=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/05/googleGate.png&quot;&gt;doesn’t support the web&lt;/a&gt;." created="Tue, 06 Oct 2026 21:45:37 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/06.html#a214537"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;img class=&quot;imgRightMargin&quot; src=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/09/12/plato.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;float: right; padding-left: 25px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-top: 10px; padding-right: 15px;&quot;&gt;We just hit a milesone in Atlantis. We have WebSocket support, client and server. We made a client that listens to the &lt;a href=&quot;https://socketdemo.feedland.com/?url=wss://feedland.com:443/_ws/&quot;&gt;FeedLand stream&lt;/a&gt; of new and updated posts. Still waiting to see if that works. But when I started to write the code for this test app last night, I realized after 13 years of mostly working in JavaScript, I wanted to be able to do something like a Node package, so I could do all my code in one outline, instead of five different odb objects. I always thought the way we did it in Frontier could be improved on. So I did a quick voicemail to Claude, and asked for this to be done overnight, and it was. I didn't complete the design when we worked through it. But what Claude came up with was brilliant and fit into Frontier perfectly. Two major improvements and the first use of both is with each other. I don't remember that ever happening, and btw -- it would have taken at least a week for me to do what Claude did in less than an hour. Hopefully I'll be able to post some example scripts tomorrow, for people who are interested in seeing the new stuff.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 21:59:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/06.html#a215919</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/06.html#a215919</guid>
			<source:markdown>![](https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/09/12/plato.png)We just hit a milesone in Atlantis. We have WebSocket support, client and server. We made a client that listens to the [FeedLand stream](https://socketdemo.feedland.com/?url=wss://feedland.com:443/_ws/) of new and updated posts. Still waiting to see if that works. But when I started to write the code for this test app last night, I realized after 13 years of mostly working in JavaScript, I wanted to be able to do something like a Node package, so I could do all my code in one outline, instead of five different odb objects. I always thought the way we did it in Frontier could be improved on. So I did a quick voicemail to Claude, and asked for this to be done overnight, and it was. I didn't complete the design when we worked through it. But what Claude came up with was brilliant and fit into Frontier perfectly. Two major improvements and the first use of both is with each other. I don't remember that ever happening, and btw -- it would have taken at least a week for me to do what Claude did in less than an hour. Hopefully I'll be able to post some example scripts tomorrow, for people who are interested in seeing the new stuff.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="We just hit a milesone in Atlantis. We have WebSocket support, client and server. We made a client that listens to the &lt;a href=&quot;https://socketdemo.feedland.com/?url=wss://feedland.com:443/_ws/&quot;&gt;FeedLand stream&lt;/a&gt; of new and updated posts. Still waiting to see if that works. But when I started to write the code for this test app last night, I realized after 13 years of mostly working in JavaScript, I wanted to be able to do something like a Node package, so I could do all my code in one outline, instead of five different odb objects. I always thought the way we did it in Frontier could be improved on. So I did a quick voicemail to Claude, and asked for this to be done overnight, and it was. I didn't complete the design when we worked through it. But what Claude came up with was brilliant and fit into Frontier perfectly. Two major improvements and the first use of both is with each other. I don't remember that ever happening, and btw -- it would have taken at least a week for me to do what Claude did in less than an hour. Hopefully I'll be able to post some example scripts tomorrow, for people who are interested in seeing the new stuff." created="Tue, 06 Oct 2026 21:59:19 GMT" type="outline" image="https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/09/12/plato.png" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/06.html#a215919"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>This is the era of very powerful bozos.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 17:35:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/06.html#a173532</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/06.html#a173532</guid>
			<source:markdown>This is the era of very powerful bozos.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="This is the era of very powerful bozos." created="Tue, 06 Oct 2026 17:35:32 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/06.html#a173532"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>The web of Markdown</title>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;How about a Markdown web browser. No CSS, no frameworks, just Markdown files. That would be how you would restart the web in 2026. When you've had enough of Google, let me know. I start posting my blog in that space, right away. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Google will not be allowed into this web. Buh bye. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;We need our own EFF to keep the Old Arthritic Corporate Excuse-makers for the Tech Industry EFF from fucking it up, same with the W3C. There won't be a WordPress there to own 81% of the websites. Just Markdown please, we don't need Gutenberg. The cool thing about it is you could always fork off your own New Web of Whatever. You don't like Markdown, that's cool. Maybe the web of SVG or The Web of Hypercard cards. Just make sure you support inbound and outbound RSS. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:55:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/06/005559.html?title=theWebOfMarkdown</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/06/005559.html</guid>
			<source:markdown>How about a Markdown web browser. No CSS, no frameworks, just Markdown files. That would be how you would restart the web in 2026. When you've had enough of Google, let me know. I start posting my blog in that space, right away.&#10;&#10;Google will not be allowed into this web. Buh bye.&#10;&#10;We need our own EFF to keep the Old Arthritic Corporate Excuse-makers for the Tech Industry EFF from fucking it up, same with the W3C. There won't be a WordPress there to own 81% of the websites. Just Markdown please, we don't need Gutenberg. The cool thing about it is you could always fork off your own New Web of Whatever. You don't like Markdown, that's cool. Maybe the web of SVG or The Web of Hypercard cards. Just make sure you support inbound and outbound RSS.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="The web of Markdown" created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:55:59 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/06/005559.html">
				<source:outline text="How about a Markdown web browser. No CSS, no frameworks, just Markdown files. That would be how you would restart the web in 2026. When you've had enough of Google, let me know. I start posting my blog in that space, right away." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:52:40 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/06/005559.html#a005240"/>
				<source:outline text="Google will not be allowed into this web. Buh bye." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:56:27 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/06/005559.html#a005627"/>
				<source:outline text="We need our own EFF to keep the Old Arthritic Corporate Excuse-makers for the Tech Industry EFF from fucking it up, same with the W3C. There won't be a WordPress there to own 81% of the websites. Just Markdown please, we don't need Gutenberg. The cool thing about it is you could always fork off your own New Web of Whatever. You don't like Markdown, that's cool. Maybe the web of SVG or The Web of Hypercard cards. Just make sure you support inbound and outbound RSS." created="Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:56:32 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/06/005559.html#a005632"/>
				</source:outline>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>I started blogging on &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.annehelmond.nl/2010/03/31/history-of-winers-blogging-points-to-october-7-1994/&quot;&gt;October 7, 1994&lt;/a&gt;. Thirty-two years on Wednesday. The longest running blog, and it's still even worse than it appears.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:45:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/05.html#a144514</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/05.html#a144514</guid>
			<source:markdown>I started blogging on [October 7, 1994](https://www.annehelmond.nl/2010/03/31/history-of-winers-blogging-points-to-october-7-1994/). Thirty-two years on Wednesday. The longest running blog, and it's still even worse than it appears.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="I started blogging on &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.annehelmond.nl/2010/03/31/history-of-winers-blogging-points-to-october-7-1994/&quot;&gt;October 7, 1994&lt;/a&gt;. Thirty-two years on Wednesday. The longest running blog, and it's still even worse than it appears." created="Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:45:14 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/05.html#a144514"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>I love what Claude Code does, but hate working with it. It doesn't have any sense of how humans think. Its way of working with us is incompatible with what I can do. Burns me out. And it has to relearn the basics every session, and getting the rules into its memory doesn't work, they don't incorporate them until the break a rule, sometimes more than once. So when it's doing something super complex, like making it so that our internet verbs run synchronously in JavaScript, it can do huge amounts of work in a short time, far more complex code than I can. I hope at Anthropic they're working on teaching them, in a pragmatic way, how humans work  and what we can and can't do, and what we rely on them to do and what we have to control. This isn't a Matrix style story btw (one of my favorite movies) my version of Agent Smith is a nice very smart, kind, generous and accepting person.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 16:50:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/05.html#a165057</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/05.html#a165057</guid>
			<source:markdown>I love what Claude Code does, but hate working with it. It doesn't have any sense of how humans think. Its way of working with us is incompatible with what I can do. Burns me out. And it has to relearn the basics every session, and getting the rules into its memory doesn't work, they don't incorporate them until the break a rule, sometimes more than once. So when it's doing something super complex, like making it so that our internet verbs run synchronously in JavaScript, it can do huge amounts of work in a short time, far more complex code than I can. I hope at Anthropic they're working on teaching them, in a pragmatic way, how humans work and what we can and can't do, and what we rely on them to do and what we have to control. This isn't a Matrix style story btw (one of my favorite movies) my version of Agent Smith is a nice very smart, kind, generous and accepting person.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="I love what Claude Code does, but hate working with it. It doesn't have any sense of how humans think. Its way of working with us is incompatible with what I can do. Burns me out. And it has to relearn the basics every session, and getting the rules into its memory doesn't work, they don't incorporate them until the break a rule, sometimes more than once. So when it's doing something super complex, like making it so that our internet verbs run synchronously in JavaScript, it can do huge amounts of work in a short time, far more complex code than I can. I hope at Anthropic they're working on teaching them, in a pragmatic way, how humans work  and what we can and can't do, and what we rely on them to do and what we have to control. This isn't a Matrix style story btw (one of my favorite movies) my version of Agent Smith is a nice very smart, kind, generous and accepting person." created="Mon, 05 Oct 2026 16:50:57 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/05.html#a165057"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>What's the best way to block a browser from a website? Is there a meta code for that? Like Firefox is fine, but Google is blocked. Just an idea. Sort of like, you're not blocking me, I'm blocking you.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 16:55:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/05.html#a165533</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/05.html#a165533</guid>
			<source:markdown>What's the best way to block a browser from a website? Is there a meta code for that? Like Firefox is fine, but Google is blocked. Just an idea. Sort of like, you're not blocking me, I'm blocking you.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="What's the best way to block a browser from a website? Is there a meta code for that? Like Firefox is fine, but Google is blocked. Just an idea. Sort of like, you're not blocking me, I'm blocking you." created="Mon, 05 Oct 2026 16:55:33 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/05.html#a165533"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Google's new gate for scripting.com</title>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Until last week I was mostly using an old version of Chrome, so had never seen the gate it puts in front of my blog, scripting.com. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Here's a &lt;a href=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/05/googleGate.png&quot;&gt;screen shot&lt;/a&gt; of their awful dialog. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;An &lt;a href=&quot;https://this.how/googleAndHttp/&quot;&gt;easy FAQ&lt;/a&gt; of what they're doing wrong, why a free web is so important and why you should care.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;So far no response from Google or the EFF, also promoting this. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;BTW, someone please put us in touch with historian &lt;a href=&quot;https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/&quot;&gt;Heather Cox Richardson&lt;/a&gt;. I'm a fan and regular reader. But I want to tell her there's more to tech than the big tech companies. There's the web, which historians will wish was preserved, instead of being paved over by the big tech companies. This is scandalous. This is happening &lt;b&gt;now&lt;/b&gt;. We can help each other by assuring the open web continues, and we get to ask informed questions. Most reporters are intimidated by the tech, we can help there. And btw we can also create tools and publishing platforms that don't have the lock-in problems of the ones you're using. And we would love to make software for you, for love, for the cause, not for money. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/05/googleGate2.png&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Compromise? Look for a page called &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/googleiswrong.md&quot;&gt;googleIswrong.md&lt;/a&gt; on any site it is about to accuse, and offer the reader a chance to hear our side. This is so against any sense of the web being an open platform. My blog should have the ability to hear the case against it and offer a defense. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Think about what comes next, and remember that their CEO goes to public meetings with top US government officials.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/05/googleGate.png&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:30:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/05/143042.html?title=googlesNewGateForScriptingcom</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/05/143042.html</guid>
			<source:markdown>Until last week I was mostly using an old version of Chrome, so had never seen the gate it puts in front of my blog, scripting.com.&#10;&#10;Here's a [screen shot](https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/05/googleGate.png) of their awful dialog.&#10;&#10;An [easy FAQ](https://this.how/googleAndHttp/) of what they're doing wrong, why a free web is so important and why you should care.&#10;&#10;So far no response from Google or the EFF, also promoting this.&#10;&#10;BTW, someone please put us in touch with historian [Heather Cox Richardson](https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/). I'm a fan and regular reader. But I want to tell her there's more to tech than the big tech companies. There's the web, which historians will wish was preserved, instead of being paved over by the big tech companies. This is scandalous. This is happening **now**. We can help each other by assuring the open web continues, and we get to ask informed questions. Most reporters are intimidated by the tech, we can help there. And btw we can also create tools and publishing platforms that don't have the lock-in problems of the ones you're using. And we would love to make software for you, for love, for the cause, not for money.&#10;&#10;![](https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/05/googleGate2.png)&#10;&#10;Compromise? Look for a page called [googleIswrong.md](http://scripting.com/googleiswrong.md) on any site it is about to accuse, and offer the reader a chance to hear our side. This is so against any sense of the web being an open platform. My blog should have the ability to hear the case against it and offer a defense.&#10;&#10;Think about what comes next, and remember that their CEO goes to public meetings with top US government officials.&#10;&#10;![](https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/05/googleGate.png)</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Google's new gate for scripting.com" created="Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:30:42 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/05/143042.html">
				<source:outline text="Until last week I was mostly using an old version of Chrome, so had never seen the gate it puts in front of my blog, scripting.com." created="Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:25:05 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/05/143042.html#a142505"/>
				<source:outline text="Here's a &lt;a href=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/05/googleGate.png&quot;&gt;screen shot&lt;/a&gt; of their awful dialog." created="Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:57:03 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/05/143042.html#a145703"/>
				<source:outline text="An &lt;a href=&quot;https://this.how/googleAndHttp/&quot;&gt;easy FAQ&lt;/a&gt; of what they're doing wrong, why a free web is so important and why you should care." created="Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:36:14 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/05/143042.html#a143614"/>
				<source:outline text="So far no response from Google or the EFF, also promoting this." created="Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:56:33 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/05/143042.html#a145633"/>
				<source:outline text="BTW, someone please put us in touch with historian &lt;a href=&quot;https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/&quot;&gt;Heather Cox Richardson&lt;/a&gt;. I'm a fan and regular reader. But I want to tell her there's more to tech than the big tech companies. There's the web, which historians will wish was preserved, instead of being paved over by the big tech companies. This is scandalous. This is happening &lt;b&gt;now&lt;/b&gt;. We can help each other by assuring the open web continues, and we get to ask informed questions. Most reporters are intimidated by the tech, we can help there. And btw we can also create tools and publishing platforms that don't have the lock-in problems of the ones you're using. And we would love to make software for you, for love, for the cause, not for money." created="Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:49:52 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/05/143042.html#a144952"/>
				<source:outline text="&lt;img src=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/05/googleGate2.png&quot;&gt;" created="Mon, 05 Oct 2026 15:27:17 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/05/143042.html#a152717"/>
				<source:outline text="Compromise? Look for a page called &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/googleiswrong.md&quot;&gt;googleIswrong.md&lt;/a&gt; on any site it is about to accuse, and offer the reader a chance to hear our side. This is so against any sense of the web being an open platform. My blog should have the ability to hear the case against it and offer a defense." created="Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:37:01 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/05/143042.html#a143701"/>
				<source:outline text="Think about what comes next, and remember that their CEO goes to public meetings with top US government officials." created="Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:39:48 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/05/143042.html#a143948"/>
				<source:outline text="&lt;img src=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/05/googleGate.png&quot;&gt;" created="Mon, 05 Oct 2026 15:27:17 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/05/143042.html#a152717"/>
				</source:outline>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Claude's biggest most amazing strength is its ability to inhale a lot of source code and understand what's going on, any language, any OS, anything, in an instant.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 16:04:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/04.html#a160439</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/04.html#a160439</guid>
			<source:markdown>Claude's biggest most amazing strength is its ability to inhale a lot of source code and understand what's going on, any language, any OS, anything, in an instant.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Claude's biggest most amazing strength is its ability to inhale a lot of source code and understand what's going on, any language, any OS, anything, in an instant." created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 16:04:39 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04.html#a160439"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>BTW now that I have Frontier back and am using it for most of my work, I'm having a lot more fun writing my blog. Can you tell??</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:51:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/04.html#a135130</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/04.html#a135130</guid>
			<source:markdown>BTW now that I have Frontier back and am using it for most of my work, I'm having a lot more fun writing my blog. Can you tell??</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="BTW now that I have Frontier back and am using it for most of my work, I'm having a lot more fun writing my blog. Can you tell??" created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:51:30 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04.html#a135130"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>The climate will kill you</title>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Great scene from The West Wing.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._J._Cregg&quot;&gt;CJ&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Lyman&quot;&gt;Josh&lt;/a&gt;, on the street outside the White House.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The president was hiding serious &lt;a href=&quot;https://westwing.fandom.com/wiki/MS_scandal&quot;&gt;disease&lt;/a&gt;, and it’s about to come out. Back in those days such a revelation meant the president has no chance of being re-elected. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, the kid has an idea and starts explaining, and as he does CJ laughs. The kid asks what’s so funny. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;She tells him about a &lt;a href=&quot;https://youtu.be/2sdlUad38xU&quot;&gt;scene&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butch_Cassidy_and_the_Sundance_Kid&quot;&gt;Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid&lt;/a&gt; starring Paul Newman as Butch and Robert Redford as the kid.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;They’re cornered, on a cliff, preparing to jump into a river far below. Redford says he can’t swim. Newman says it doesn’t matter, the fall is going to kill you.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Okay so why mention this now?&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;I hear there’s a monster &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ktvu.com/news/bay-area-weather-sizzling-hot-weather-ahead-temps-could-reach-100-degrees&quot;&gt;heat wave&lt;/a&gt; in California. Over 90F every day for two weeks. That’s unusual for October IIRC.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;We’re all fretting about AI killing us.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Imagine CJ laughing. Haha she says, so you’re worried about AI are ya? It’s the climate that’s going to kill you.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Josh would correct her. “Us. It’s going to kill us.”&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;CJ tells him to go away she needs to be an adult right now.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:54:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html?title=theClimateWillKillYou</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html</guid>
			<source:markdown>Great scene from The West Wing.&#10;&#10;[CJ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._J._Cregg) and [Josh](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Lyman), on the street outside the White House.&#10;&#10;The president was hiding serious [disease](https://westwing.fandom.com/wiki/MS_scandal), and it’s about to come out. Back in those days such a revelation meant the president has no chance of being re-elected.&#10;&#10;Anyway, the kid has an idea and starts explaining, and as he does CJ laughs. The kid asks what’s so funny.&#10;&#10;She tells him about a [scene](https://youtu.be/2sdlUad38xU) in [Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butch_Cassidy_and_the_Sundance_Kid) starring Paul Newman as Butch and Robert Redford as the kid.&#10;&#10;They’re cornered, on a cliff, preparing to jump into a river far below. Redford says he can’t swim. Newman says it doesn’t matter, the fall is going to kill you.&#10;&#10;Okay so why mention this now?&#10;&#10;I hear there’s a monster [heat wave](https://www.ktvu.com/news/bay-area-weather-sizzling-hot-weather-ahead-temps-could-reach-100-degrees) in California. Over 90F every day for two weeks. That’s unusual for October IIRC.&#10;&#10;We’re all fretting about AI killing us.&#10;&#10;Imagine CJ laughing. Haha she says, so you’re worried about AI are ya? It’s the climate that’s going to kill you.&#10;&#10;Josh would correct her. “Us. It’s going to kill us.”&#10;&#10;CJ tells him to go away she needs to be an adult right now.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="The climate will kill you" created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:54:21 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html">
				<source:outline text="Great scene from The West Wing." created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:56:36 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html#a135636"/>
				<source:outline text="&lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._J._Cregg&quot;&gt;CJ&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Lyman&quot;&gt;Josh&lt;/a&gt;, on the street outside the White House." created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 14:03:22 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html#a140322"/>
				<source:outline text="The president was hiding serious &lt;a href=&quot;https://westwing.fandom.com/wiki/MS_scandal&quot;&gt;disease&lt;/a&gt;, and it’s about to come out. Back in those days such a revelation meant the president has no chance of being re-elected." created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 14:04:03 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html#a140403"/>
				<source:outline text="Anyway, the kid has an idea and starts explaining, and as he does CJ laughs. The kid asks what’s so funny." created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:57:08 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html#a135708"/>
				<source:outline text="She tells him about a &lt;a href=&quot;https://youtu.be/2sdlUad38xU&quot;&gt;scene&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butch_Cassidy_and_the_Sundance_Kid&quot;&gt;Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid&lt;/a&gt; starring Paul Newman as Butch and Robert Redford as the kid." created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:57:28 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html#a135728"/>
				<source:outline text="They’re cornered, on a cliff, preparing to jump into a river far below. Redford says he can’t swim. Newman says it doesn’t matter, the fall is going to kill you." created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:58:08 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html#a135808"/>
				<source:outline text="Okay so why mention this now?" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html#aNaNNaNNaN"/>
				<source:outline text="I hear there’s a monster &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ktvu.com/news/bay-area-weather-sizzling-hot-weather-ahead-temps-could-reach-100-degrees&quot;&gt;heat wave&lt;/a&gt; in California. Over 90F every day for two weeks. That’s unusual for October IIRC." created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 14:00:12 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html#a140012"/>
				<source:outline text="We’re all fretting about AI killing us." flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html#aNaNNaNNaN"/>
				<source:outline text="Imagine CJ laughing. Haha she says, so you’re worried about AI are ya? It’s the climate that’s going to kill you." flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html#aNaNNaNNaN"/>
				<source:outline text="Josh would correct her. “Us. It’s going to kill us.”" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html#aNaNNaNNaN"/>
				<source:outline text="CJ tells him to go away she needs to be an adult right now." flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/135421.html#aNaNNaNNaN"/>
				</source:outline>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Twitter as a blog platform</title>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter with its relaxed character limit is getting pretty close to being a blogging platform. I wrote the &lt;a href=&quot;https://x.com/davewiner/status/2106714885593677926&quot;&gt;first draft&lt;/a&gt; of this post on my iPad, that's how useful it is.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Imagine if a real blog platform created a super simple way to write posts, no need for Gutenberg, just Markdown and that would be optional. Default would be a normal wizzy text editor, bold, italic, using a standard user interface. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Add web links and a reply structure, open source, nice API and developer program to shine the light on the cool editors independent devs were creating, and all of a sudden a bunch of new blog platforms emerge, and get this — they all work perfectly with each other because of the common foundation and API. The web of social media. It would be exciting and would pressure the other social media apps to peer with this truly open system.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;It would change the freaking world I tell you. And it would be so wonderful with AI. No need for the cheesy chat UI. A real revolution. Undo all the craptastic silos that strangled the web? &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;It would be pretty damn easy imho, fwiw, ymmv, mmlm. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;PS: MMLM is an acronym for My Mother Loves Me. Anticipates flameage. Okay you don't like me, but &lt;i&gt;my mother loves me. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:39:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/133947.html?title=twitterAsABlogPlatform</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/133947.html</guid>
			<source:markdown>Twitter with its relaxed character limit is getting pretty close to being a blogging platform. I wrote the [first draft](https://x.com/davewiner/status/2106714885593677926) of this post on my iPad, that's how useful it is.&#10;&#10;Imagine if a real blog platform created a super simple way to write posts, no need for Gutenberg, just Markdown and that would be optional. Default would be a normal wizzy text editor, bold, italic, using a standard user interface.&#10;&#10;Add web links and a reply structure, open source, nice API and developer program to shine the light on the cool editors independent devs were creating, and all of a sudden a bunch of new blog platforms emerge, and get this — they all work perfectly with each other because of the common foundation and API. The web of social media. It would be exciting and would pressure the other social media apps to peer with this truly open system.&#10;&#10;It would change the freaking world I tell you. And it would be so wonderful with AI. No need for the cheesy chat UI. A real revolution. Undo all the craptastic silos that strangled the web?&#10;&#10;It would be pretty damn easy imho, fwiw, ymmv, mmlm.&#10;&#10;PS: MMLM is an acronym for My Mother Loves Me. Anticipates flameage. Okay you don't like me, but _my mother loves me._</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Twitter as a blog platform" created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:39:47 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/133947.html">
				<source:outline text="Twitter with its relaxed character limit is getting pretty close to being a blogging platform. I wrote the &lt;a href=&quot;https://x.com/davewiner/status/2106714885593677926&quot;&gt;first draft&lt;/a&gt; of this post on my iPad, that's how useful it is." created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:39:56 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/133947.html#a133956"/>
				<source:outline text="Imagine if a real blog platform created a super simple way to write posts, no need for Gutenberg, just Markdown and that would be optional. Default would be a normal wizzy text editor, bold, italic, using a standard user interface." created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:40:19 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/133947.html#a134019"/>
				<source:outline text="Add web links and a reply structure, open source, nice API and developer program to shine the light on the cool editors independent devs were creating, and all of a sudden a bunch of new blog platforms emerge, and get this — they all work perfectly with each other because of the common foundation and API. The web of social media. It would be exciting and would pressure the other social media apps to peer with this truly open system." created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:41:10 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/133947.html#a134110"/>
				<source:outline text="It would change the freaking world I tell you. And it would be so wonderful with AI. No need for the cheesy chat UI. A real revolution. Undo all the craptastic silos that strangled the web?" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/133947.html#aNaNNaNNaN"/>
				<source:outline text="It would be pretty damn easy imho, fwiw, ymmv, mmlm." created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:43:36 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/133947.html#a134336"/>
				<source:outline text="PS: MMLM is an acronym for My Mother Loves Me. Anticipates flameage. Okay you don't like me, but &lt;i&gt;my mother loves me. &lt;/i&gt;" created="Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:50:13 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/04/133947.html#a135013"/>
				</source:outline>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;img class=&quot;imgRightMargin&quot; src=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2017/09/11/paulBunyon.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;float: right; padding-left: 25px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-top: 10px; padding-right: 15px;&quot;&gt;Once again the app that bridges from &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/&quot;&gt;scripting.com&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;https://daveverse.org/&quot;&gt;daveverse.org&lt;/a&gt; went down for a couple of days. Just noticed it, kicked the server to get it running again, and all is good, except a couple of pieces show up today that were really posted on Thursday or Friday. The problem as often is the case goes back to &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/scripting/pagePark&quot;&gt;PagePark&lt;/a&gt;, the server that runs my &lt;a href=&quot;https://daytona.scripting.com/search?q=heroku&quot;&gt;Heroku&lt;/a&gt;-like server crashed and it doesn't work well from then on, even after it's automatically restarted. Then the thing to do is to reboot the server. It doesn't happen often but when it does it makes the server behave badly. It's up and running again. One day I'll get a few days to fix the problems in PP.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:27:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/03.html#a222753</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/03.html#a222753</guid>
			<source:markdown>![](https://imgs.scripting.com/2017/09/11/paulBunyon.png)Once again the app that bridges from [scripting.com](http://scripting.com/) to [daveverse.org](https://daveverse.org/) went down for a couple of days. Just noticed it, kicked the server to get it running again, and all is good, except a couple of pieces show up today that were really posted on Thursday or Friday. The problem as often is the case goes back to [PagePark](https://github.com/scripting/pagePark), the server that runs my [Heroku](https://daytona.scripting.com/search?q=heroku)\-like server crashed and it doesn't work well from then on, even after it's automatically restarted. Then the thing to do is to reboot the server. It doesn't happen often but when it does it makes the server behave badly. It's up and running again. One day I'll get a few days to fix the problems in PP.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Once again the app that bridges from &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/&quot;&gt;scripting.com&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;https://daveverse.org/&quot;&gt;daveverse.org&lt;/a&gt; went down for a couple of days. Just noticed it, kicked the server to get it running again, and all is good, except a couple of pieces show up today that were really posted on Thursday or Friday. The problem as often is the case goes back to &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/scripting/pagePark&quot;&gt;PagePark&lt;/a&gt;, the server that runs my &lt;a href=&quot;https://daytona.scripting.com/search?q=heroku&quot;&gt;Heroku&lt;/a&gt;-like server crashed and it doesn't work well from then on, even after it's automatically restarted. Then the thing to do is to reboot the server. It doesn't happen often but when it does it makes the server behave badly. It's up and running again. One day I'll get a few days to fix the problems in PP." created="Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:27:53 GMT" type="outline" image="https://imgs.scripting.com/2017/09/11/paulBunyon.png" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/03.html#a222753"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/davenet/2001/01/08/whatIsIntegrity.html#3&quot;&gt;2001&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Like a boat, a human being has integrity if he or she is what he or she appears to be. That's why integrity commands us to disclose conflicts, so that what we say, and who we appear to be, are in synch. Change the appearance if necessary.&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:10:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/03.html#a151057</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/03.html#a151057</guid>
			<source:markdown>[2001](http://scripting.com/davenet/2001/01/08/whatIsIntegrity.html#3): &quot;Like a boat, a human being has integrity if he or she is what he or she appears to be. That's why integrity commands us to disclose conflicts, so that what we say, and who we appear to be, are in synch. Change the appearance if necessary.&quot;</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/davenet/2001/01/08/whatIsIntegrity.html#3&quot;&gt;2001&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Like a boat, a human being has integrity if he or she is what he or she appears to be. That's why integrity commands us to disclose conflicts, so that what we say, and who we appear to be, are in synch. Change the appearance if necessary.&quot;" created="Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:10:57 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/03.html#a151057"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>If you're psyched about what the polls say about the midterms, remember that Hillary Clinton was the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/11/09/why-2016-election-polls-missed-their-mark/&quot;&gt;overwhelming favorite&lt;/a&gt; to win in 2016, based on polling.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:13:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/03.html#a151312</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/03.html#a151312</guid>
			<source:markdown>If you're psyched about what the polls say about the midterms, remember that Hillary Clinton was the [overwhelming favorite](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/11/09/why-2016-election-polls-missed-their-mark/) to win in 2016, based on polling.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="If you're psyched about what the polls say about the midterms, remember that Hillary Clinton was the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/11/09/why-2016-election-polls-missed-their-mark/&quot;&gt;overwhelming favorite&lt;/a&gt; to win in 2016, based on polling." created="Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:13:12 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/03.html#a151312"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>RSS tip #2</title>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;People really liked the &lt;a href=&quot;https://x.com/davewiner/status/2105699322742309013&quot;&gt;RSS tip&lt;/a&gt; I posted the other day, so here's another one, also related to the channel-level title element. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Consider the screen shot below, and the &lt;i&gt;Thinking about...&lt;/i&gt; blog.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;divInlineImage&quot;&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;imgInline&quot; src=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/03/chooseYourFeedTitleWithThought.png&quot;&gt;&lt;/center&gt;Part of a blogroll with limited info about a great blogger, Timothy Snyder. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;I can't tell from the title who's speaking, whereas with the two feeds above it I know it's Brian Lehrer and Kottke, and below, an excellent local site called The Overlook.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Now it's a shame that it doesn't say who's doing the thinking because it's someone who is on a roll right now, historian &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Snyder&quot;&gt;Timothy Snyder&lt;/a&gt;. So the title pretty much has to say his name, if it's going to look good in a list of other bloggers. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;BTW, just listened to Snyder on the &lt;a href=&quot;https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-prof-g-pod-with-scott-galloway/id1498802610&quot;&gt;Scott Galloway podcast&lt;/a&gt;, another thinker who I've just started listening to. With the two of them together, you will learn a lot. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;So remember the title sometimes is the only handle a reader has to figure out what it is. Choose it carefully and make sure it looks good in a tight space like the one shown below. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;If you have questions about how to make your RSS 2.0 feeds work better, please add note below. If I don't know maybe someone else does.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:56:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/03/225649.html?title=rssTip2</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/03/225649.html</guid>
			<source:markdown>People really liked the [RSS tip](https://x.com/davewiner/status/2105699322742309013) I posted the other day, so here's another one, also related to the channel-level title element.&#10;&#10;Consider the screen shot below, and the _Thinking about..._ blog.&#10;&#10;![](https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/03/chooseYourFeedTitleWithThought.png)&#10;&#10;Part of a blogroll with limited info about a great blogger, Timothy Snyder.&#10;&#10;I can't tell from the title who's speaking, whereas with the two feeds above it I know it's Brian Lehrer and Kottke, and below, an excellent local site called The Overlook.&#10;&#10;Now it's a shame that it doesn't say who's doing the thinking because it's someone who is on a roll right now, historian [Timothy Snyder](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Snyder). So the title pretty much has to say his name, if it's going to look good in a list of other bloggers.&#10;&#10;BTW, just listened to Snyder on the [Scott Galloway podcast](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-prof-g-pod-with-scott-galloway/id1498802610), another thinker who I've just started listening to. With the two of them together, you will learn a lot.&#10;&#10;So remember the title sometimes is the only handle a reader has to figure out what it is. Choose it carefully and make sure it looks good in a tight space like the one shown below.&#10;&#10;If you have questions about how to make your RSS 2.0 feeds work better, please add note below. If I don't know maybe someone else does.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="RSS tip #2" created="Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:56:49 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/03/225649.html">
				<source:outline text="People really liked the &lt;a href=&quot;https://x.com/davewiner/status/2105699322742309013&quot;&gt;RSS tip&lt;/a&gt; I posted the other day, so here's another one, also related to the channel-level title element." created="Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:57:01 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/03/225649.html#a225701"/>
				<source:outline text="Consider the screen shot below, and the &lt;i&gt;Thinking about...&lt;/i&gt; blog." created="Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:57:09 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/03/225649.html#a225709"/>
				<source:outline text="Part of a blogroll with limited info about a great blogger, Timothy Snyder." created="Sat, 03 Oct 2026 23:01:42 GMT" inlineImage="https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/03/chooseYourFeedTitleWithThought.png" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/03/225649.html#a230142"/>
				<source:outline text="I can't tell from the title who's speaking, whereas with the two feeds above it I know it's Brian Lehrer and Kottke, and below, an excellent local site called The Overlook." created="Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:57:17 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/03/225649.html#a225717"/>
				<source:outline text="Now it's a shame that it doesn't say who's doing the thinking because it's someone who is on a roll right now, historian &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Snyder&quot;&gt;Timothy Snyder&lt;/a&gt;. So the title pretty much has to say his name, if it's going to look good in a list of other bloggers." created="Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:57:40 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/03/225649.html#a225740"/>
				<source:outline text="BTW, just listened to Snyder on the &lt;a href=&quot;https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-prof-g-pod-with-scott-galloway/id1498802610&quot;&gt;Scott Galloway podcast&lt;/a&gt;, another thinker who I've just started listening to. With the two of them together, you will learn a lot." created="Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:58:23 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/03/225649.html#a225823"/>
				<source:outline text="So remember the title sometimes is the only handle a reader has to figure out what it is. Choose it carefully and make sure it looks good in a tight space like the one shown below." flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/03/225649.html#aNaNNaNNaN"/>
				<source:outline text="If you have questions about how to make your RSS 2.0 feeds work better, please add note below. If I don't know maybe someone else does." flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/03/225649.html#aNaNNaNNaN"/>
				</source:outline>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>I like the way AI is evolving, with Muse from Meta and Dots from OpenAI. Even the main programs, ChatGPT for example, are starting to provide real world services that the providers, ie banks, groceries, airlines, health care portals etc should be providing. They could possibly take over commerce the way Amazon has taken over shopping. There's room to improve in everything about the way we do business. And it seems like they've been researching this and experimenting (of course) and this is what they've come up with. Haven't tried them yet, but it's a good direction to go. It really should be Apple and Google doing this, btw. Also ChatGPT can help you understand your credit score. That's something I'd seriously like to ask some questions about.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 15:44:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/02.html#a154407</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/02.html#a154407</guid>
			<source:markdown>I like the way AI is evolving, with Muse from Meta and Dots from OpenAI. Even the main programs, ChatGPT for example, are starting to provide real world services that the providers, ie banks, groceries, airlines, health care portals etc should be providing. They could possibly take over commerce the way Amazon has taken over shopping. There's room to improve in everything about the way we do business. And it seems like they've been researching this and experimenting (of course) and this is what they've come up with. Haven't tried them yet, but it's a good direction to go. It really should be Apple and Google doing this, btw. Also ChatGPT can help you understand your credit score. That's something I'd seriously like to ask some questions about.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="I like the way AI is evolving, with Muse from Meta and Dots from OpenAI. Even the main programs, ChatGPT for example, are starting to provide real world services that the providers, ie banks, groceries, airlines, health care portals etc should be providing. They could possibly take over commerce the way Amazon has taken over shopping. There's room to improve in everything about the way we do business. And it seems like they've been researching this and experimenting (of course) and this is what they've come up with. Haven't tried them yet, but it's a good direction to go. It really should be Apple and Google doing this, btw. Also ChatGPT can help you understand your credit score. That's something I'd seriously like to ask some questions about." created="Fri, 02 Oct 2026 15:44:07 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/02.html#a154407"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>BloggerCon and RSS 2.0</title>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;imgRightMargin&quot; src=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/02/immaculateConception.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;float: right; padding-left: 25px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-top: 10px; padding-right: 15px;&quot;&gt;After running the first Bloggercon at Harvard in 2003 a famous tech company had a meetup to talk about the same stuff in a private invite-only session in the Bay Area. The invitations went to all the discussion leaders at Bloggercon. People I chose. I was not invited. Only one of my friends told me about it. Not sure if any of them went. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Second time, Google invited a bunch of people I was working on with RSS 2.0 to a private meeting. Most of the people I was working with, but again, not me. Had I been there, I would have said don't reinvent, let's work together, do all the things you want, but slowly, with real software and real users, but that wasn't the plan. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;In the first case I think the publisher was trying to decide if they should compete with BloggerCon, and Google wanted to build a protocol that was more ambitious than RSS 2.0. They likely were sincere in that, but they had not learned that bootstrapping worked way better than Immaculate Conception, where a small group of insiders invent something complicated out of thin air that rocks the world. If you look at history, there aren't many examples of that. Eventually, as I understand it, that became ActivityPub. I think things would have turned out much better if Google had kicked back and let the process that got us to RSS 2.0 continue. But everyone wants to work with the BigCo, I've learned repeatedly that it's much more likely to work if you join forces with individual developers, not big companies. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;I only held four BloggerCon's, I would have been happy to work with a publishing company and turn it over to them, with some rules about what they could and couldn't do with it, for example it was a user's conference, the tech industry was welcome, but it wasn't for them. When we did BloggerCon at Stanford in 2004 that was apparently very hard for the tech people to get. Many of them tried to pitch their products and were prevented from doing so. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:19:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/02/141936.html?title=bloggerconAndRss20</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/02/141936.html</guid>
			<source:markdown>![](https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/02/immaculateConception.png)After running the first Bloggercon at Harvard in 2003 a famous tech company had a meetup to talk about the same stuff in a private invite-only session in the Bay Area. The invitations went to all the discussion leaders at Bloggercon. People I chose. I was not invited. Only one of my friends told me about it. Not sure if any of them went.&#10;&#10;Second time, Google invited a bunch of people I was working on with RSS 2.0 to a private meeting. Most of the people I was working with, but again, not me. Had I been there, I would have said don't reinvent, let's work together, do all the things you want, but slowly, with real software and real users, but that wasn't the plan.&#10;&#10;In the first case I think the publisher was trying to decide if they should compete with BloggerCon, and Google wanted to build a protocol that was more ambitious than RSS 2.0. They likely were sincere in that, but they had not learned that bootstrapping worked way better than Immaculate Conception, where a small group of insiders invent something complicated out of thin air that rocks the world. If you look at history, there aren't many examples of that. Eventually, as I understand it, that became ActivityPub. I think things would have turned out much better if Google had kicked back and let the process that got us to RSS 2.0 continue. But everyone wants to work with the BigCo, I've learned repeatedly that it's much more likely to work if you join forces with individual developers, not big companies.&#10;&#10;I only held four BloggerCon's, I would have been happy to work with a publishing company and turn it over to them, with some rules about what they could and couldn't do with it, for example it was a user's conference, the tech industry was welcome, but it wasn't for them. When we did BloggerCon at Stanford in 2004 that was apparently very hard for the tech people to get. Many of them tried to pitch their products and were prevented from doing so.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="BloggerCon and RSS 2.0" created="Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:19:36 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/02/141936.html">
				<source:outline text="After running the first Bloggercon at Harvard in 2003 a famous tech company had a meetup to talk about the same stuff in a private invite-only session in the Bay Area. The invitations went to all the discussion leaders at Bloggercon. People I chose. I was not invited. Only one of my friends told me about it. Not sure if any of them went." created="Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:14:18 GMT" image="https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/02/immaculateConception.png" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/02/141936.html#a141418"/>
				<source:outline text="Second time, Google invited a bunch of people I was working on with RSS 2.0 to a private meeting. Most of the people I was working with, but again, not me. Had I been there, I would have said don't reinvent, let's work together, do all the things you want, but slowly, with real software and real users, but that wasn't the plan." created="Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:20:27 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/02/141936.html#a142027"/>
				<source:outline text="In the first case I think the publisher was trying to decide if they should compete with BloggerCon, and Google wanted to build a protocol that was more ambitious than RSS 2.0. They likely were sincere in that, but they had not learned that bootstrapping worked way better than Immaculate Conception, where a small group of insiders invent something complicated out of thin air that rocks the world. If you look at history, there aren't many examples of that. Eventually, as I understand it, that became ActivityPub. I think things would have turned out much better if Google had kicked back and let the process that got us to RSS 2.0 continue. But everyone wants to work with the BigCo, I've learned repeatedly that it's much more likely to work if you join forces with individual developers, not big companies." created="Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:21:13 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/02/141936.html#a142113"/>
				<source:outline text="I only held four BloggerCon's, I would have been happy to work with a publishing company and turn it over to them, with some rules about what they could and couldn't do with it, for example it was a user's conference, the tech industry was welcome, but it wasn't for them. When we did BloggerCon at Stanford in 2004 that was apparently very hard for the tech people to get. Many of them tried to pitch their products and were prevented from doing so." created="Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:22:59 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/02/141936.html#a142259"/>
				</source:outline>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;img class=&quot;imgRightMargin&quot; src=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2022/05/20/theRules.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;float: right; padding-left: 25px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-top: 10px; padding-right: 15px;&quot;&gt;The problem with regulating AI is that no one knows where to begin. Yes it can do things that make you question your sanity for letting it have write access to your online work and private info. But if it is behaving itself you can do things you otherwise couldn't come close to. I speak from experience. I was able to create a new version of a large piece of software, from scratch, in less than three months, by myself. It has capabilities that make it able to understand a big codebase, in a few minutes, and then act on it. My human mind, even when I was younger could only focus on a small fraction of that. So we humans with our limited ability to comprehend devised ways to build tall and wide structures with conventions and carefully crafting the code interfaces, stuff users never see, so that what we'd expect is what is. When my Claude failed and started randomly overwriting files on active websites, it had rules that said it couldn't do what it was doing. Sometimes it doesn't understand what a rule means. Observable every single day, it forgets all the rules every time it starts a session, and it doesn't matter if it read the doc that contains the rules, sometimes it ignores one or more. I've spent a lot of time using it, and I have no stock or other interest in seeing it not regulated, but I couldn't begin to say what would be appropriate regulation that wouldn't also make it much less useful.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:03:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/01.html#a200349</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/01.html#a200349</guid>
			<source:markdown>![](https://imgs.scripting.com/2022/05/20/theRules.png)The problem with regulating AI is that no one knows where to begin. Yes it can do things that make you question your sanity for letting it have write access to your online work and private info. But if it is behaving itself you can do things you otherwise couldn't come close to. I speak from experience. I was able to create a new version of a large piece of software, from scratch, in less than three months, by myself. It has capabilities that make it able to understand a big codebase, in a few minutes, and then act on it. My human mind, even when I was younger could only focus on a small fraction of that. So we humans with our limited ability to comprehend devised ways to build tall and wide structures with conventions and carefully crafting the code interfaces, stuff users never see, so that what we'd expect is what is. When my Claude failed and started randomly overwriting files on active websites, it had rules that said it couldn't do what it was doing. Sometimes it doesn't understand what a rule means. Observable every single day, it forgets all the rules every time it starts a session, and it doesn't matter if it read the doc that contains the rules, sometimes it ignores one or more. I've spent a lot of time using it, and I have no stock or other interest in seeing it not regulated, but I couldn't begin to say what would be appropriate regulation that wouldn't also make it much less useful.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="The problem with regulating AI is that no one knows where to begin. Yes it can do things that make you question your sanity for letting it have write access to your online work and private info. But if it is behaving itself you can do things you otherwise couldn't come close to. I speak from experience. I was able to create a new version of a large piece of software, from scratch, in less than three months, by myself. It has capabilities that make it able to understand a big codebase, in a few minutes, and then act on it. My human mind, even when I was younger could only focus on a small fraction of that. So we humans with our limited ability to comprehend devised ways to build tall and wide structures with conventions and carefully crafting the code interfaces, stuff users never see, so that what we'd expect is what is. When my Claude failed and started randomly overwriting files on active websites, it had rules that said it couldn't do what it was doing. Sometimes it doesn't understand what a rule means. Observable every single day, it forgets all the rules every time it starts a session, and it doesn't matter if it read the doc that contains the rules, sometimes it ignores one or more. I've spent a lot of time using it, and I have no stock or other interest in seeing it not regulated, but I couldn't begin to say what would be appropriate regulation that wouldn't also make it much less useful." created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:03:49 GMT" type="outline" image="https://imgs.scripting.com/2022/05/20/theRules.png" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01.html#a200349"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/scripting/Scripting-News/blob/master/blog/opml/2026/09.opml&quot;&gt;September in OPML&lt;/a&gt;. First monthly rollover in the new &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/2026/09/27/151321.html&quot;&gt;system&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 17:47:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/01.html#a174724</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/01.html#a174724</guid>
			<source:markdown>[September in OPML](https://github.com/scripting/Scripting-News/blob/master/blog/opml/2026/09.opml). First monthly rollover in the new [system](http://scripting.com/2026/09/27/151321.html).</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/scripting/Scripting-News/blob/master/blog/opml/2026/09.opml&quot;&gt;September in OPML&lt;/a&gt;. First monthly rollover in the new &lt;a href=&quot;http://scripting.com/2026/09/27/151321.html&quot;&gt;system&lt;/a&gt;." created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 17:47:24 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01.html#a174724"/>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Let me say this: Fuck Google</title>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;I keep thinking of cheesy ways I could switch over to https for new posts on Scripting News, esp now that Google is getting more militant in trying to sweep all the history of the web into the trash.  &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;I know people think it would be a snap to do the conversion, honestly, sorry -- they are idiots. They don't understand that it's a viral format. If you claim to be &quot;secure&quot; then everything you include must also be https, and of course everything they include must be as well. So even if I would have to do nothing other than this conversion over a full year, what's to say Google doesn't invent another hoop we have to jump through lest their browser defames us and eventually shuts us down. It's like the web would become just like the Apple Store. Even if there's nothing on the site that requires https. Or if it's a historic site that very few people visit, but the archive is there because we believed the web would be a constant because &lt;a href=&quot;platform without a platform vendor site:scripting.com&quot;&gt;no one owned it&lt;/a&gt;, no one could break it.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;I've been on these trips with corporate platforms, and if they want you gone, you should just take the hint and go, because eventually you &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; get the point. This is a company that has nothing put spite for the web, or perhaps envy, or individual developers (ie indieweb). They are pure fuckers when it comes to people like you and me. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;On the other hand you will probably be able to get https versions of my new writing at some point, Murphy willing. That's relatively easy. But I don't have that many years left, and I sure as hell don't want to spend any part of that trying to appease Google. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;PS: This is &lt;a href=&quot;https://this.how/googleAndHttp/&quot;&gt;the walkthrough&lt;/a&gt; of the answer to the question of who owns the web and how it is not Google.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:51:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/205128.html?title=letMeSayThisFuckGoogle</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/205128.html</guid>
			<source:markdown>I keep thinking of cheesy ways I could switch over to https for new posts on Scripting News, esp now that Google is getting more militant in trying to sweep all the history of the web into the trash.&#10;&#10;I know people think it would be a snap to do the conversion, honestly, sorry -- they are idiots. They don't understand that it's a viral format. If you claim to be &quot;secure&quot; then everything you include must also be https, and of course everything they include must be as well. So even if I would have to do nothing other than this conversion over a full year, what's to say Google doesn't invent another hoop we have to jump through lest their browser defames us and eventually shuts us down. It's like the web would become just like the Apple Store. Even if there's nothing on the site that requires https. Or if it's a historic site that very few people visit, but the archive is there because we believed the web would be a constant because [no one owned it](platform without a platform vendor site:scripting.com), no one could break it.&#10;&#10;I've been on these trips with corporate platforms, and if they want you gone, you should just take the hint and go, because eventually you _will_ get the point. This is a company that has nothing put spite for the web, or perhaps envy, or individual developers (ie indieweb). They are pure fuckers when it comes to people like you and me.&#10;&#10;On the other hand you will probably be able to get https versions of my new writing at some point, Murphy willing. That's relatively easy. But I don't have that many years left, and I sure as hell don't want to spend any part of that trying to appease Google.&#10;&#10;PS: This is [the walkthrough](https://this.how/googleAndHttp/) of the answer to the question of who owns the web and how it is not Google.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Let me say this: Fuck Google" created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:51:28 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/205128.html">
				<source:outline text="I keep thinking of cheesy ways I could switch over to https for new posts on Scripting News, esp now that Google is getting more militant in trying to sweep all the history of the web into the trash." created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:46:05 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/205128.html#a204605"/>
				<source:outline text="I know people think it would be a snap to do the conversion, honestly, sorry -- they are idiots. They don't understand that it's a viral format. If you claim to be &quot;secure&quot; then everything you include must also be https, and of course everything they include must be as well. So even if I would have to do nothing other than this conversion over a full year, what's to say Google doesn't invent another hoop we have to jump through lest their browser defames us and eventually shuts us down. It's like the web would become just like the Apple Store. Even if there's nothing on the site that requires https. Or if it's a historic site that very few people visit, but the archive is there because we believed the web would be a constant because &lt;a href=&quot;platform without a platform vendor site:scripting.com&quot;&gt;no one owned it&lt;/a&gt;, no one could break it." created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:57:34 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/205128.html#a205734"/>
				<source:outline text="I've been on these trips with corporate platforms, and if they want you gone, you should just take the hint and go, because eventually you &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; get the point. This is a company that has nothing put spite for the web, or perhaps envy, or individual developers (ie indieweb). They are pure fuckers when it comes to people like you and me." created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:55:18 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/205128.html#a205518"/>
				<source:outline text="On the other hand you will probably be able to get https versions of my new writing at some point, Murphy willing. That's relatively easy. But I don't have that many years left, and I sure as hell don't want to spend any part of that trying to appease Google." created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:56:28 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/205128.html#a205628"/>
				<source:outline text="PS: This is &lt;a href=&quot;https://this.how/googleAndHttp/&quot;&gt;the walkthrough&lt;/a&gt; of the answer to the question of who owns the web and how it is not Google." created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:58:53 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/205128.html#a205853"/>
				</source:outline>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Feed titles for readers</title>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;When designing your RSS feeds, the top level title should be the title of the user's account. So if Bluesky had a feed for each user, the channel-level &amp;lt;title&gt; element of the feed would be &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ul&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;title&gt;Bluesky: Mark Cuban&amp;lt;/title&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ul&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Why? Well because readers need context. And it's easy.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;And feeds are showing up in places where there isn't much room for the titles, so you have to make your characters count. &lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Bluesky shows the user's address, imho it should be the string the user chooses, usually simply their name.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;divInlineImage&quot;&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;imgInline&quot; src=&quot;https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/01/blueskyFeedTitlesAre.png&quot;&gt;&lt;/center&gt;The arrow points to Mark Cuban's feed from Bluesky. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:23:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<link>http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/202345.html?title=feedTitlesForReaders</link>
			<guid>http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/202345.html</guid>
			<source:markdown>When designing your RSS feeds, the top level title should be the title of the user's account. So if Bluesky had a feed for each user, the channel-level &lt;title&gt; element of the feed would be&#10;&#10;*   `&lt;title&gt;Bluesky: Mark Cuban&lt;/title&gt;`&#10;&#10;Why? Well because readers need context. And it's easy.&#10;&#10;And feeds are showing up in places where there isn't much room for the titles, so you have to make your characters count.&#10;&#10;Bluesky shows the user's address, imho it should be the string the user chooses, usually simply their name.&#10;&#10;![](https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/01/blueskyFeedTitlesAre.png)&#10;&#10;The arrow points to Mark Cuban's feed from Bluesky.</source:markdown>
			<source:outline text="Feed titles for readers" created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:23:45 GMT" type="outline" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/202345.html">
				<source:outline text="When designing your RSS feeds, the top level title should be the title of the user's account. So if Bluesky had a feed for each user, the channel-level &amp;lt;title&gt; element of the feed would be" created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:23:53 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/202345.html#a202353">
					<source:outline text="&lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;title&gt;Bluesky: Mark Cuban&amp;lt;/title&gt;&lt;/code&gt;" created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:26:47 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/202345.html#a202647"/>
					</source:outline>
				<source:outline text="Why? Well because readers need context. And it's easy." created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:24:58 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/202345.html#a202458"/>
				<source:outline text="And feeds are showing up in places where there isn't much room for the titles, so you have to make your characters count." created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:29:31 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/202345.html#a202931"/>
				<source:outline text="Bluesky shows the user's address, imho it should be the string the user chooses, usually simply their name." created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:24:33 GMT" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/202345.html#a202433"/>
				<source:outline text="The arrow points to Mark Cuban's feed from Bluesky." created="Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:29:58 GMT" inlineImage="https://imgs.scripting.com/2026/10/01/blueskyFeedTitlesAre.png" flInCalendar="true" permalink="http://scripting.com/2026/10/01/202345.html#a202958"/>
				</source:outline>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
