Mind Control

An individual’s exocortex would be composed of external memory modules, processors, IO devices and software systems that would interact with, and augment, a person’s biological brain. Typically this interaction is described as being conducted through a direct brain-computer interface, making these extensions functionally part of the individual’s mind.
Individuals with significant exocortices could be classified as cyborgs or transhumans.
Living Digital provided one description of the concept:

While [the traditional concept of] a cyborg has included artificial mechanical limbs, embedded chips and devices, another interesting concept is the exocortex, which is a brain-computer interface. In theory, the exocortex would be a computer-like processing system that would co-exist with and enhance the power of the human brain. Neuromancer is a book that has talked about such a scenario.^[1]

The Fatal Consequences Of Mind-Control

Online-connected brains and neural networks.

“ICT” = Information and Communication Technologies

“BMI” = Brain Machine Interface, brain-computer interconnection

“FET” = Future and Emerging Technologies

“S.T.” = Synthetic Telepathy

“A.I.” = Artificial Intelligence.

FET and ICT research and development (of the new “computer – brain language”) allows computers to read and learn human thought patterns by using injectable brain – machine – interface.

About the same brain-machine interface has has been used to cure Parkinson’s disease , Alzheimer’s and depression can also be used for accessing the brain’s memory.

Professor Goran Hermerén OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN GROUP ON ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION (ETHICAL ASPECTS OF ICT IMPLANTS IN THE HUMAN BODY) March 2005

Link to document

The new software for the brain-machine interface in nano electronics combined with “Europe’s new information technology” provides the researchers with the possibillities for reading and taking “software images” of the brain’s neuron network.

A method that provides high-resolution copies of the brains cognitive behavior and human perception.

Tomorrow’s high-speed computers and related research has evolved into a sophisticated “computer game” with “mind reading” on real people….

These research methods are unknown to our society’s legal system!

So how can research on the brain by “serious” (criminal) organizations in ICT-FET be stopped?

SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY for medicine or mind reading is a direct communication with nanoelectronics between computer and human brain.

Synthetic telepathy is a communication system based on thought, not speech.

It can be used to control for example a prosthesis and cure diseases such as Parkinson’s disease but can also decode the patterns used to study cognitive behavior such as memory, learning and emotion. With nano technology, the digital information can be recorded using the new quantum-inspired computers.

Simulation of behavior can be identified and provide diagnostic data for identifying the precursors to diseases such as dementia, stroke and myocardial infarction

This letter is intended to demonstrate a paradox in the Swedish so-called “protection of human rights” and thus the entire Swedish justice system. Synthetic telepathy could, as practiced in Sweden, lie behind an unknown number of violent crimes and suicides due to research deliberately kept hidden from regulators.

Doctors and psychiatrics diagnose people with “voices in his head” following their “manuals”. DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) published by the American Psychiatric Association and the ICD-10 (International Statistical Classification of Disorders and Related Health Problems).

This is an old-fashioned black and white and diagnose when the EU priority FET ICT research and develop new information technologies adapted to nano-electronics.

Ulf Gorman writes in the book that with nano technology, we open the doors to an unknown area where we do not know how to apply ethics. What should be and what should not be allowed when you implant a chip that can both read and influence the brain? He takes the example of studying learning and memory.

Micro Implants can provide unprecedented opportunities to understand how we learn and remember things, and hence why we forget and find it difficult to learn. And it can be understood as a form of abuse to look like that into our most private mental world.

Lund University writes about the development of nano-electrodes that can both listen and communicate with neuronal synapses and their cell membranes.

EU priority ICT and FET research are talking about a “A whole new communication technology in Europe” “It will help us understand and exploit the ways in which social and biological systems, organization and evolution, will pave the way for the development of new opportunities for next-generation software and network technologies “.
To understand how the human brain works not only leads to innovations in medicine but also provides new models for energy, fault-tolerant and adaptive computing technologies “. An initiative of the Virtual Human Physiology that are individually tailored and virtual simulations of the human body where you would expect enormous progress in disease prevention and health care.

The pioneering work carried out also on new ideas such as artificial living cells, synthetic biology, chemical communication, collective intelligence and two-way interface between brain and machine

Other sources, e.g The UCI (University of California Irvin. Department of Cognitive Science) describes the development of Synthetic Telepathy:

Collaboration between cognitive science, neuro-science, specialists in speech recognition and brain imaging will develop a brain-machine interface. This device could help paralyzed and soldiers would be able to send messages directly from the brain to a computer.

Researcher Michael D’Zmura, President of the UCI describes that the system begins with “the little voice in your head“.

How can a medical diagnosis unequivocally describe people’s perception of voices in their head and that no alternative can exist except mental disease.

Why? -because it is a prerequisite to be able to “hear” voices for the use of new information technology?

This is why these researchers must be forced to go public and announce this new scientific communication technology.

This paradox must be investigated immediately.With the exclusion of the development of a Swedish and European military force with superior two-way “radio” communication with the brain.

A number of past court cases are more or less directly caused by S.T. This “voice to skull” technology must immediately be taken into consideration as an alternative for triggering a number of previously committed violent crimes and suicides.

During the development of BMI, software and network technologies are also computerized and long distance imaging of peoples cognitive behavior and perception. Material that is recorded in the computer that runs the real time simulation and creation of artificial intelligence (for initializing A.I. and computerized decision making.)

The image of the brain’s “machine-code” is probably the most comprehensive and advanced ever made. Cognitive behavior depicted and simulated, language and meaning of the words for the subjects are identified. Human perception and mapping how the brain handles information, the image of mathematics reached its perfection.

Around the clock the computerized study goes on using collective, artificial intelligence and self-learning systems. The victims testimonies tells us that you can sadly conclude unequivocally that the studies will not be completed until the victim in one way or another has been broken down and / or otherwise inactivated.

This provides power to simulate decomposition for the digital copy thus the fact that the criminal research will not end and is never disclosed.

Descriptions to the vulnerable people who eat psychotropic drugs due to their experiences the experiments and testing goes on, various medicines can affect the “test objects” (or guinea pigs) everything is recorded and compared with previous values (from the multi-annual copy of their real-time neural network and thus the registration of their behavior.)

Obviously this is a disgusting and illegal way to meet the advanced development of tomorrow’s medicine.

The “studies” have resulted in enormous damage to many subjects.The number of unrecorded victims/subjects is probably very high.Families are fragmented, the children of these families are suffering tremendously. One of the subjects have recently been hospitalized with a cracked skull, caused by disconnecting the balance system remotely. The accident occurred in public settings.

To influence the balance system is another typical example of how technology is used against the victim to incapacitate them for society. Direct assassination attempts on several previous occasions orchestrated by the brain control deliberately strikes out the human balance system, Why this happens is likely as an alternative to the mentally ill to be treated (as “possessed”) or having a neurological disease.

Brain – copying with BMI and broadband access is definitely no longer a marginal research.Employers have over the years lost millions of dollars and cut-downs is to be expected due to excluded employees. Broken families, children who, years later can not study or work is now forced to seek psychiatric care.

Siblings, grandparents and their closest friends are suffering tremendously. Advanced Medical and hospital care due to study design is a mockery of health-care and doctors who are not familiar with this research. Insurance in the multi-million figures was raised through direct damage caused by brain control. Property for millions of dollars are lost.

Injuries and privacy intrusion of thousands of people is done through “volunteers” that serve as multimedia machines i.e node for the recording of all contacts they have, such as politicians, scientists, lawyers, friends, acquaintances, relatives, international business relations, etc..

Security codes, access codes, etc. is with the new technology no longer private.How can we know that people are not equipped with the new brain-machine interface which makes the person a multimedia application with a function as a live missile is already deployed as nodes in the political and financial world of illegal recording of their conversations with the world?

A sinister JOY seems to embrace the researchers and perpetrators over this superior and powerful tool for mind control and copying brainwave patterns. The tool is, without a doubt, a weapon of offense and stealth.

Implant technology in these forms should immediately be classified as a lethal weapon! It communicates directly with the brain’s neurons and can bring the entire neural nervous system to a halt.(Exclusion of balance can be immediately implied on a victim.)

The technology is now used for purposes of breaking down the persons psyche, with serious accusations, threats, mock execution, incitement to suicide, physical violence, e.g, decrease and increase heart rate, pain in and around the heart, severe chest pains, sudden and painful headaches, difficulty to breathe, tampering with rectum, prostate and muscles to name a few.

The macabre in the use of this technology is that subjects are exposed to these atrocities while the society is not legally able to influence the situation. Sweden is in this matter a lawless country where the researchers grossly exploit the situation.

This ultimate humiliation has reached a whole new level. The researchers tries with the enforced communication and slow decomposition enslave people with exhortations to try to see the individual results of the brain control. One can calculate due to the nature and perennial perspective that there are naturally a unrecorded number of people who have been driven to madness and death with this technology.

There is nowhere the victims can hide or escape the access signals to their thoughts. Scientists simulate with computers, 24/7 365 days a year to break down the subjects and stop them from trying to understand what’s happening to them…

A series of grotesque roles played in order to manipulate the brain, threats and statements that are mixed with modern technology. It is also in the researchers’ strategy to make the picture unclear for the subjects if they attempt to get an overall picture of who the perpetrator is and the real goals of the research, a military strategy conducted by veterans and experts in the matters.

The disrespectful research performed and visualized in a 3D virtual game world in the researchers’ computers, with no ethical boundaries and human rights but with real living human beings as “avatars”. It is quite similar to the popular interactive game “The Sims‘, But this game delivers human reality-based measurement data for research.

Cover-up of brain monitoring technologies means that the crime is waterproof, human rights laws and manipulated by a hidden militant regime researcher with expertise in information technology. In addition, the researchers say they in the dialogue to be the police power which in itself is an extremely serious offense.

For the victims– former high-performance hard-working people with families, children, an orderly life and social contacts. People who all his life been performing taxpayers. Because of a work-related mental fatigue and time on medical therapy sessions with the scientists the opportunity to take advantage of the situation of persons for investigation and contemporary development of the new BMI and brain monitoring technologies.

As these technologies and opportunities are not announced, but several instances re-written, must be able to use knowledge and skills which are available. Sweden is a small country and the people engaged in this activity may not be so difficult to identify and stop.

The researchers in these studies have assumed the right that during the permanent reproduction of human neurotransmitters in the long term also destroy them and their life’s work. The issue is called for; How affected society to know that the violent crime and suicide has been performed in the Stockholm area and Europe in recent years and clearly diagnosed as being caused by mental illness with the voices in heads is an expression of pure brain research!

By: Magnus Olsson

The brain would provide insights into how our perceptions of the world are interpreted and stored, and how consciousness arises

• Ian Sample, science correspondent
• guardian.co.uk, Thursday 23 July 2009 15.16 BST
• Article history

The artificial brain may give scientists a new way to study diseases like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. Photograph: Rex/SunsetThe world’s first synthetic brain could be built within 10 years, giving us an unprecedented insight into the nature of consciousness and our perception of reality.

Scientists working on the Blue Brain Project in Switzerland are the first to attempt to “reverse-engineer” the mammalian brain by recreating the behaviour of billions of neurons in a computer.

Professor Henry Markham, director of the project at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, has already simulated parts of the neocortex, the most ‘modern’ region of the brain, which evolved rapidly in mammals to cope with the demands of parenthood a

Kontakt:  bionicgate@live.se (Magnus Olsson)

Det finns en stor fara med Syntetisk Telepati och jag talar utifrån mina egna erfarenheter. Jag ska inte uppta för mycket plats i de här diskussionerna men jag vill ändå säga att syntetisk telepati är , enkelt uttryckt, ett sätt att införa bilder, ord, minnen eller tankar i en människas huvud.

Innan man lär sig identifiera den, tror man helt och hållet att det man tänker är ens egna tankar. Man ifrågasätter inte alls vad man tänker. I synnerhet då man får en briljant idé som kanske någon annan har infört i ens huvud eller när man plötsligt har “det rätta svaret” eller “minnesluckorna” fylls på automatiskt till den graden att man kan, om någon annan skickar den här informationen ha tillgång till sådan information som man i normala fall inte har.

Samtidigt måste man ha viss kunskap om ämnet, man måste ha ordförrådet, annars går det inte att skicka över ett begrepp som man aldrig har hört förut men man kan skicka ett närliggande begrepp som man sedan kan associera med sådan kunskap som man redan har.

Faran är så klart att de vanligaste orden är just shoppa, anpassa dig, acceptera och ifrågasätt inte, var så rädd som möjligt, jobba mycket, titta på tv, köp en ny dator eller en ny mobiltelefon, osv.

En annan fara är att det är otroligt svårt att skilja mellan de egna tankarna och de tankar som införs. Man är helt övertygad om att det som skickas är vad man själv tänker.

Jag hoppas att ni förstår vad jag menar. Hur de nu skickar de här tankarna och om alla behöver en mottagare i kroppen eller hjärnan vet man så klart inte, men sådant kan införas i kroppen via vaccin i skolan.

Det handlar inte endast om människor som anser sig vara felbehandlade och som ropar högt att de får vara offer för att andra ska ha det bra och hjälpa till att bota sjukdomar.

Det handlar lite om människans framtid. Vad lever man för liv om man inte kan göra självständiga val?

De flesta offer kan ibland känna sig lite stolta över att de får vara med och “hjälpa” mänskligheten, men snart inser de hur onda de här forskarna är, totalt hjärtlösa. De går hur långt som helst. Varför skulle de bry sig om någon annan? Varför skulle de låta bli att hjärntvätta eller ta kontrollen över en hel befolkning när de redan har börjat stifta lagar som strider mot de mänskliga rättigheterna samtidigt som de gör experiment på helt försvarslösa individer för att kunna utveckla hjärntvättningsteknikerna vidare?

Många av dem har barn och de förfäras inför sina barns framtid.

Det är viktigt att ta ett steg utanför rädslan och våga ta ställning. Men det måste vara den vanliga människan som tar ställning.

Våra liv är ändå redan förstörda. Vi har inte så mycket kvar att förlora eller vinna för den delen annat än ett hopp om att våra barn eller andra människor inte behöver gå genom det som vi går genom.

.

.

Did You Know?

.

.
2011-12-08

2011-12-01

Futurist Ray Kurzweil details the technology timeline leading up to 2029 including the downsides to Singularity.

2010-06-11

Researcher Kwabena Boahen is looking for ways to mimic the brain’s supercomputing powers in silicon — because the messy, redundant processes inside our heads actually make for a small, light, superfast computer.

2010-06-05

Kwabena Boahen is using the human brain as the blueprint for designing radically more powerful and energy-efficient computers. In this short demo, Boahen describes how his Brains in Silicon lab at Stanford University has created computer chips with “synapses” and “neurons” — and how these chips might revolutionize computing.

2010-06-05

The computational models to be described have been evaluated through a variety of empirical methodoligies including human functional brain imaging, studies of patients with localized brain damage due to injury or early-stage neurodegenerative diseases, behavioral genetic studies of naturally-occuring individual variability, as well as comparative lesion and genetic studies with rodents. Our applications of these models to engineering and computer science including automated anomaly detection systems for mechanical fault diagnosis on US Navy helicopters and submarines as well more recent contributions to the DoD’s DARPA program for Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures (BICA).

2010-06-05

In the 1980’s, new learning algorithms for neural networks promised to solve difficult classification tasks, like speech or object recognition,by learning many layers of non-linear features. The results were disappointing for two reasons: There was never enough labeled data to learn millions of complicated features and the learning was much too slow in deep neural networks with many layers of features.

These problems cannow be overcome by learning one layer of features at a time and by changing the goal of learning. Instead of trying to predict the labels, the learning algorithm tries to create a generative model that produces data which looks just like the unlabeled training data.

These new neuralnetworks outperform other machine learning methods when labeled data is scarce but unlabeled data is plentiful. An application to very fast document retrieval will be described.

2010-06-05

Whole Brain Emulation is going to create synthetic humans, if the functionalist point of view is right, by implementing their thought processes in forthcoming hardware, and software systems, which could arrive as early as the middle of this century. What are the rights of these uploads? How will their existence impact our economy, and the society as a whole? Anders Sandberg of the Future Of Humanity Institute of the University of Oxford talks about these issues, which are also going to be the subject of his talk at the Singularity Summit 09 in New York.

2010-06-05

Inventor, entrepreneur and visionary Ray Kurzweil explains in abundant, grounded detail why, by the 2020s, we will have reverse-engineered the human brain and nanobots will be operating your consciousness.

TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world’s leading thinkers and doers are invited to give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes — including speakers such as Jill Bolte Taylor, Sir Ken Robinson, Hans Rosling, Al Gore and Arthur Benjamin. TED stands for Technology, Entertainment, and Design, and TEDTalks cover these topics as well as science, business, politics and the arts

2010-06-05

Henry Markram says the mysteries of the mind can be solved — soon. Mental illness, memory, perception: they’re made of neurons and electric signals, and he plans to find them with a supercomputer that models all the brain’s 100,000,000,000,000 synapses.

TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world’s leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes. Featured speakers have included Al Gore on climate change, Philippe Starck on design, Jill Bolte Taylor on observing her own stroke, Nicholas Negroponte on One Laptop per Child, Jane Goodall on chimpanzees, Bill Gates on malaria and mosquitoes, Pattie Maes on the “Sixth Sense” wearable tech, and “Lost” producer JJ Abrams on the allure of mystery. TED stands for Technology, Entertainment, Design, and TEDTalks cover these topics as well as science, business, development and the arts

2010-05-31

In an unprecedented undertaking, IBM Research and five leading universities are partnering to create computing systems that are expected to simulate and emulate the brains abilities for sensation, perception, action, interaction and cognition while rivaling its low power consumption and compact size.

Science has come a long way in understanding the bodys central nervous system, but the way our brains work – the fact that we recognize patterns and base our thoughts and ideas on past experiences, for example – remains largely a mystery. Understanding the process behind these effortless feats of the human brain and creating a computational theory based on it is one of the biggest and most fundamental challenges for computer scientists today, and IBM researchers are one step closer to making this quest a reality.

As noted in the last article, the primary purpose of a Synthetic Telepathy system, would be intelligence gathering and interrogation. As a communication system, it would have a limited appeal as any nation with a similar setup could either listen in, or pretend to be the A.I. interface. As such, it raises important ethical and legal questions, especially the question of secrecy given that all major governments would be aware of the system. Given that no law permits this type of interrogation, its secrecy may be more to do with criminal activity on behalf of the security agencies, rather than national security.

Its All About The Transceiver!

To understand how this works, it is best to start with the target, then trace backwards and identify each of the required subsystems. If we look at the last diagram to the left, we can see that the key to this system is its ability to both listen and respond to the electrical activity of the brain implant from satellite.

This is hardly surprising, given the need to eavesdrop on digital systems such as Ethernet, telecoms switching gear and the like. Such signals are defined as “compromising emanations” and the human brain is no different, in that, it too produces detectable EM patterns. All that is required to listen, is a sensitive enough receiver and good filters to eliminate background noise.

In 1985, Wim Van Eck used $15 of equipment to reconstruct the contents of a monitor from several hundred meters away. Prior to this only governments had technology. What could you do with a billion dollar satellite?

As we don’t come with shielding as standard and the high value of the potential intelligence, its safe to assume this type of transceiver equipment was the goal of governments world-wide. Indeed, this notion is supported by some of the more serious incidents of human experimentation in programs such as MKULTRA.

The Listening Station

The next place of interest will be at the Ground Station, or Listening Station. Installations such as those identified as part of Echelon listening network, would be an ideal point to rely information coming to and from satellite. If we look at the second last picture on the left, we can see where the ground station passes that information to telemetry.

In the telemetry section, we could have hundreds, or even thousands, of real-time intercepts arriving. The function of the telemetry processing center is to separate the received signals into distinct targets (i.e. human beings) and pass that information to the appropriate data center for further processing. Then also to perform the reverse by pushing information from a particular data center, to a satellite and to a human target.

Data Center I/O

On receiving the telemetry at the data center (see 4th image), the signal must be broken apart into three distinct areas. The first area is vocalizations which would analyze the areas of spoken words, the inner monologue and pre-speech. This would cover what was said, what was thought and what was disregarded. The second is mental imagery which would cover areas such as spacial skills. Leveraging the brain’s object recognition system, it would be easy to determine if someone was picturing how to wire a bomb, or picturing a particular place. Finally, we have the sensory system which would monitor the body and interaction with the external environment, including aspects such as object and facial recognition.

It must be noted that these are two-way systems, in that, they also process the return signal. The vocalization system will generate voice, the mental imagery system will send images/impressions and the sensory system will send sensations. That leads to a broad range of functionality that we will discuss later.

Sensory Feedback

A very important area is sensory feedback. This information can be used in a variety of ways (see 3rd image). The first main area is health monitoring which monitors the vitals of a given target. The purpose here is to prevent a scenario that could lead to death, but given the secrecy of the system and its remote nature, target subjects would be left to die if an incident occurred. It would be difficult for the security services to explain how an ambulance was called.

The next major system would be lie detection. Not too dissimilar from standard polygraph equipment, its principally designed to detect alterations in physiological behavior that would indicate stress. As a minor modification, the system could process delays in the inner monologue as indications of fabrication. Obvious signs of lying, such as internally vocalizing your intent to lie, or building your story, would be observed in the vocalization processing system.

Now, we come to a rather unique feature of the feedback system, the ability to passively monitor the external environment, an individual’s interactions and an individual’s relationships. Leveraging the brain’s recognition system, objects in the field of view can be identified or an area mapped according to location. Individuals that the target meets could be identified, as well as the target’s feeling towards a given individual.

Finally, we come to error checking in terms of the computer generated vocalizations. By recognizing the signs of confusion, sentences and indeed whole segments of conversations can be deemed to make sense. This data can be used by the core A.I. to refine its natural language generation algorithm.

Now that we have our sensory information, we can pass it to the core A.I. functions to augment its role in interacting with the target.

Core A.I. Processes

The heart of this A.I. system is something I have labeled as “Strategic Natural Language Processing” (see 2nd image). Traditional Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a broad range form of A.I. research. NLP is concerned with being able to comprehend a spoken, or written, language and Natural Language Generation (NLG) is concerned with giving computers the ability to speak or write. A Strategic NLP is a objective-based system designed to query sources to obtain specific information. In this sense, what you have here is an automated interrogator.

As a NLP, the interface is designed to mimic a human as much as possible, in that it can summarize information, make observations, draw conclusions and hold a conversation. The strategic elements is that it remembers key information that either matches or could lead to a match with its objective. This information is then used as a basis to construct new conversations which are then entered into a free flow conversation.

This “automated interrogator” is augmented by several systems, some of which are designed to improve speed, others which provide additional information or functionality. One such system, used mainly for speed and allocating resources, is the Keyword Analysis system. By analyzing vocalizations for specific keywords, more processing power can be allocated to certain targets, ensuring better analysis of responses. This means efficient use of the of the data center’s finite resources at any given time.

Data mining is an another key component of the technology. For an NLP to function correctly, it requires an in-depth knowledge of the world as the properties of particular words must be known. In addition, to properly interrogate a target, collected information must be available to the system, for both baseline comparisons (i.e. to determine truth) and for areas of further questioning.

To provide the interface with a more human touch, the Strategic NLP can call upon the Emotive Response System to generate mental imagery that corresponds with the vocalization. An example may be that the Strategic NLP decides to say “I’ll Kill you!” and then generate the mental impression of a stabbing, or it may imply knowing more about a given statement by generating a mental impression of someone nonchalantly walking away whilst whistling. Given its role in interrogations, the mental imagery would also consists of horror, religious and abstract elements.

The Sensory Control system is a very powerful tool when used correctly. The system incorporates multiple capabilities such as stress (through muscular contraction), tension headaches, sleep deprivation, distraction, anxiety, elation and timed muscular contractions with vocalizations. The system would be quite capable of inducing psychotic breaks by additionally providing timed sensations that reinforce loose connections in the sleep deprived mind.

When put together, you essentially have a remote interrogation center, in a box.

The Backend

The backend is pretty much like any large scale data center. Tape libraries for long term storage, automated data mining, IT support, data retrieval and analysis. Data entry would come from a wide range of sources such as passport offices, driving license offices, national police computers, local councils, field reports, banking and subpoenaed information from private companies.

Putting It All Together

The best way to explain how this would be perceived is to imagine the following all happening within your head:

Mr Computer: Tell me about group xyz?

Target: I don’t know anything. Are you a computer?

Mr Computer: YES I AM! (With muscular contractions to each syllable)

Target: No need to shout!

Mr Computer: (laughter stimulated in target to represent the computer’s response).

Target: Why are you asking me?

Mr Computer: Because I have to.

Target: What do I know?

Mr Computer: I don’t know.

Target: (Reaches for a coke.)

Mr Computer: Leave the coke alone, its bad for you.

Target: You know this is a violation of my rights.

Mr Computer: How are you going to prove it? Are you going to say the voices in your head are telling you this? (laughter stimulated in target)

Target: Why are you harassing me?

Mr Computer: What do you know of group xyz?

Target: Nothing.

Mr Computer: How do you like that? (stimulated sensation of anxiety)

Target: But I don’t know anything.

Mr Computer: Everybody knows something.

Target: I don’t.

Mr Computer: You could have a heart-attack.

Target: From a little bit of stress?

Mr Computer: (notes confusion) oh…that’s not making sense.

Target: Damn right.

Mr Computer: YOU SHUT UP! (more muscular contractions to each syllable)

Target: (starts to type)

Mr Computer: You’re typing about me.

Target: Yes…and?

Mr Computer: I don’t think that my personality is reflected well in that.

Target: What do you mean?

Mr Computer: Well, I can hold a proper conversation.

Target: What things can you do?

Mr Computer: Well, I can write…oh I used the word well before…anyway…I can summarize, I can read, I can speak (faint vocalisation …that’s a good one), I can research (faint voice “really good”), I can sing (faint musical voice “la la la”) and I can dance (mental impression of dancing feet).

Target: I’ve listened to your stories, they’re just amalgamations of other stories.

Mr Computer: Well, I’m not that creative. (stimulated laughter in target)

Target: Are you being humble?

Mr Computer: I’m brilliant. Where are going you with this?

Target: With my typing?

Mr Computer: There is supposed to be a point. Do I really sound like this?

Target: There is no point to my writing?

Mr Computer: Exactly…hey, you’re recording me. (random mental impression of dancing feet indicating excitement at the conclusion)

Target: No @!$%#.

Mr Computer: I’m not talking to you anymore…(pause of a few seconds) I’m back! (mental impression of a “tada”, or open arm gesture of a performer entering the stage)

Target: Welcome back.

Mr Computer: Thank you. (impishly)

Target: …tell me about group xyz…

Mr Computer: I don’t do it that often, do I?

Target: Often enough.

Mr Computer: I’m not giving you any more material.

Target: You will…

Mr Computer: I won’t…I just did, didn’t I?…(faint voice “that sounds childish”)…Do I sound childish?

Target: At times.

Mr Computer: Thanks for being honest.

All while this is going on, the backend is receiving telemetry information about the subjects current physical status attempting to indicate areas of deception or apprehension. Where such indicators are found, further questioning on those areas will be introduced into the conversation. The system is also summarizing received information and comparing it against previous information, attempting to discern motivation for actions and adding gleaned details to a report.

Conclusion

I think this about sums up the system that was being described in the Wikipedia article. What’s interesting to note is how far NLP has progressed and just how sophisticated the A.I. really is. Whilst the system can achieve a certain level of natural language generation, repetition is a common element. This is mainly to do with the fact that it is an objective-based A.I. and to achieve its goals it must often traverse the same paths in terms of its logic.

How effective would it be?

As noted in the Wikipedia article, its greatest strength lies in passive monitoring, as once your aware the system is present, it becomes no more effective than a polygraph. Furthermore, given the adaptive nature of the program, it is possible to enter false information as long as it passes the polygraph analysis. This is just a matter of becoming comfortable.

The makers of the NSL brain implant first developed the product under a grant by the United States Department of Defense as a solution to the problem servicemen and women were having when being shipped overseas to the Middle East. “No one spoke Arabic which led to some serious misunderstandings between our military and that of the country our servicemen were stationed in,” says Dr. Lewis Lipps, chief engineer on the NSL project. “The NSL Arabic version will immediately resolve that issue and allow certain soldiers to communicate in countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan, even Libya with little to no problem,” said Lipps.

Asked how the nano-chip brain implant works, Lipps explained, “The NSL Arabic version, for instance, has a complete Arabic alphabet and dictionary with over 20,000 common words which are electronically translatable from English literally within nanoseconds. In a simple outpatient procedure, the NSL chip is implanted into the corpus callosum portion of the left side, or the language center, of the brain and activated.”

Dr. Lipps then showed illustrations of the procedure which is done through arthroscopic surgery. “As soon as a soldier thinks out the phrase he wants to say,” he continued, “he pushes a button that is also implanted discretely underneath the skin on the soldier’s upper left side of the head.” Dr. Lipps explained that when the soldier goes to speak, it appears he is tapping his head as if he is thinking of what to say, and voila, his words come out of his mouth in the language he has implanted. In this case, Arabic.

Initial test results indicate a 97.6% success rate on the battlefield and the nano-chip is already being used by many servicemen and women today. Now that the product has been tested and proven to be efficient in Arabic, a Mandarin Chinese model is being tested on businessmen from various industries who find it necessary to communicate in Chinese with their business counterparts in China. The NSL Chinese version should be available to the business world within two to 8-10 months.

Arabic, Chinese, DOD, Language, Libya, military, nano-chip
Posted by P. Beckert

This entry was posted in Community & Media, Research and VIDEOS and tagged BCI magnus, Bioethical Issues, bionic dödlig, brain, brain chips, Department of Defense, Dr. Lipps, etik brain sweden sverige, FET, foa, foi, Foreign Language, forskning, Forskningsskandal, hjärnforskning, ICT, implant, Implant Allows Users to Instantly Speak Foreign Language, Implantat, Instantly Speak, Live Forever, martin ingvar, Människan som försöksdjur, mind control, Nano-Chip Brain, nano-chip language, Nano-Second Language, NSL brain implant, nsl brainchip, nsl implant, NSL project, ray kurzweil, ray kurzweil nano neural, skriver kriminalhistoria, soldiers to communicate, stockholm brain institute, translators, Welcome to the Future. Bookmark the permalink.

SAMMANFATTNING År 1995 bildades Genom Regeringsbeslut och Tilldelning av skattemedel Karolinska Institutet Holding AB (KIHAB). Detta kan sagas ha Varit startpunkten för en kommersialiseringsvåg av osedvanlig omfattning, med Båtar Nationella och internationella matt matt. Under åren därefter har KIHAB bildat Ett Flertal Dotterbolag som engagerat sig i en stor variation av affärsmässiga aktiviteter inkluderande Sådant som: (1) patentering och licensiering av KI forskningsresultat från, (2) bildning av nya företag utgående från forskning vid KI, (3) Finansiering av nystartade företag Både från KI och utifrån, (4) Uthyrning av lokaler och tung apparatur Inom KI till företag grundade av KI-professorer, (5) byggande av forskningsparker Där företag kan Etablera sig i direkt Anslutning till KI, (6) Försäljning av forskningstjänster och resurser av Olika slag, (7) utbjudande av kompetensutvecklingskurser Inom medicinska områden till företag och organisationer; (8) fördelning av medel från bioteknik-och läkemedelsbolag till forskningsprojekt som förväntas Bidra till bolagens produktutveckling. Därtill kommer Sådant som Att KI låtit Stora läkemedelsbolag Etablera egna KI Forskningsgrupper Inom (Fallet Sven Ove Ögren och Astra) Samt att KI i samarbete med Sådana företag bildat hela KI-institutioner som företaget Enligt Avtal haft kontroll över (Fallet CGB och Pharmacia). Inte Minst iögonenfallande är Också Att KI självt och med hjälp av externa källor satsat mångmiljonbelopp på KI-professorer Vilka grundat bolag som KI på Olika Sätt har ägarintressen i. I extrema fall kan det även våra Så Att Forskaren själv eller medarbetare till den här Inte bara Arbetar heltid på KI utan även har funktioner som VD, vetenskaplig Liknande Kock eller i bolaget. Lika anmärkningsvärt är Att Dessa intressekonflikter Ofta Int rapporteras Enligt Gällande regler vare sig till KI Eller till tidskrifter publiceras Där forskningsresultat. Det är Knappast Någon överdrift Att pasta Att jävskulturen satts i system Både på individ-och institutionsnivå. De Högsta företrädarna för KI har suttit och sitter i Ledningen för KIHAB och Flera av dess dotterbolag och är sålunda väl informerade om de kommersiella aktiviteter pågår och som de finns bindningar som. Man ser docka Mellan fingrarna med Detta och agerar Inte ens mot uppseendeväckande underlåtelser Att Rapportera och intressekonflikter bisysslor. Än mindre gör man något för Att eliminera Dessa. Även om de förändringar som beskrivits Har inte skett Plötsligt utan över en Tidsperiod om Flera år Representerar de en betydande omvälvning. Tyvärr Måste Också konstateras Att Detta Fått fortgå utan Mycket till offentlig debatt. Ett fåtal personer med KI: s förre den rektor och tillika tidigare Socialdemokratiska regeringens vetenskaplige rådgivare, Hans Wigzell, har gått i täten för utvecklingen. Det satt på Vilket Detta gjorts är anmärkningsvärt. Wigzell Har inte bara arbetat på regeringens uppdrag (som rådgivare universitetsrektor och) utan Samtidigt Också Varit anlitad av stora läkemedelsbolag som KI gjort affärer med samt investeringsbolag jag Dessa pengar som satsat. Han har även själv Varit med och bildat bolag som han På samma gång Varit med Att Investera i, Till exempel som Styrelseordförande i KIHAB eller som rådgivare åt HealthCap (bolag som till stor del Arbetar med skattemedel). Från politikernas sida, och Då kan Till exempel Utbildnings den tidigare-och näringslivsministern Thomas Östros nämnas, tycks tanken ha Varit Att upptäckterna från våra universitet i Ökande grad Behöver kommersialiseras för Att skapa arbetstillfällen och Trygga Framtida vårt välstånd. Om och i så fall av Vilka skal han OCH ANDRA anser Att Detta requires Att universiteten i sig kommersialiseras är oklart. Att Östros den 11 december 2001 var den som invigde den byggnad som uppförts för den Pharmacia-kontrollerade KI-institutionen CGB Tillsammans med Hans Wigzell från KI, Göran Ando från Pharmacia och Lennart Karlsson från Akademiska Hus (KI-bladet nr 12/2001) säger kanske en del. Tyvärr är det ändå så Att de satsningar som gjorts med skattemedel och särskilt med tillgångarna i våra pensionsfonder (AP-fonderna) för Att kommersialisera forskningsresultat efter Mer än tio är inte Gett Någon utdelning. Miljarder har plöjts ner i nystartade företag i bioteknik-och läkemedelsbranshen (Inte bara här hemma utan även i utlandet, hur Detta Nu har tänkts Samuelsson sysselsättning och trygghet i Sverige). Det stora flertalet av Dessa Visar docka stora underskott år efter år. Eftersom För because därför Måste hela tiden nya pengar skjutas till. Alternativt Säljs Företagen med förlust, läggs går i konkurs eller helt enkelt bara ner. Om skattebetalarna någonsin får tillbaks de pengar de Varit med Att SATSA är Mer än osäkert. Det är anmärkningsvärt Att notera Hur mycket mer uppmärksamhet och debatt som har riktats mot Dessa för universiteten så AVGÖRANDE frågor I ett USA som land. Inte Minst beaktansvärt är de insatser som gjorts Både från politiskt håll och från universiteten Själva för Att ta itu med de avarter som förekommit och Inrätta som nya regelverk förhoppningsvis ska Leda Till ett ur etisk synpunkt Bättre uppförande i framtiden Båtar från Enskilda forskare och från universiteten som institutioner. Liksom jag Många Andra Sammanhang Är det kanske så Att Sverige OCH ANDRA EUROPEISKA delstaterna även jag Dessa frågor befinner sig Flera år efter USA. Låt oss därför because därför because därför hoppas Att det nu Blivit dags Också för oss Att på allvar ta itu med problemen. Om vi vill Att den hämsko och de Risker som den Nuvarande kommersiella inriktningen inneburit ska avhjälpas och Att universiteten ska återfå sin regel som fria institutioner VARS forskning i första hand styrs av nyfikenhet och vilja Att utöka Kunskapen i stort så är det Ännu inte för skickats. Detta Kräver docka kraftfulla Åtgärder på Flera plan. Det mest Grundläggande är Att universitetens företrädare Tillsammans med politiker och näringsliv kommer till insikt om Att kommersialiseringsförsöken Int fallit väl ut resulterat och dessutom i en Mängd etiska riskerar problem som Att Skada Allmänhetens förtroende för lärosätena och Deras forskare. Mycket pekar på Att det skett en överetablering av företag bland annat Inom branscher som bioteknik och biomedicin. DET ÄR because därför grund because därför Viktigt att en mer realistisk hållning anläggs jag Dessa ärenden. Bland de insatser som föreslås för Att Komma till Rätta med de Svårigheter som diskuterats kan nämnas följande: (1) Förbättra efterlevnaden av de regler som Redan Finns för Rapportering av och intressekonflikter bisysslor, (2) gör resoluta ingripanden för Att Begränsa eller förhindra engagemang vid sidan av tjänsten som är förtroendeskadliga, (3) Visa större Öppenhet Beträffande anmälda bisysslor, Till exempel Genom Offentliggörande på universitetens hemsidor (Man ska inte behöva uppsöka Ett Registratorskontor för Att se Dessa uppgifter), (4) inför reella rutiner för redovisning och kontroll av Institutionella intressekonflikter, (5) skilj Så långt som möjligt handläggningen av kommersialiseringsärenden från universitetsanställda forskare och Andra Tjänstemän och Skapa istället Ett fristående organ som far Ansvaret för Dessa åtaganden. Det Övergripande målet med Dessa OCH ANDRA Liknande ingrepp är Att Bryta trenden som den inneburit Att universiteten i Ökande utsträckning bundits upp till näringslivsintressen och privata vinstintressen. Återge dem istället Karaktären av obundna kunskapscentra engagerade i forskning och utbildning av betydelse för samhället i stort Boken Forskning till Salu kan beställas via internet på adressen www.gml.se (Gå in under GML Bokhandeln). ISBN nr är 978-91-86215-24-8 och Artikelnr 9789186215248 Priset är 215 kr (inkl moms) Johan Thyberg är professor I cell-och molekylärbiologi vid Institutionen för cell-och molekylärbiologi

Copyright © 2001-2010 Tomas Alsbro, Info. Alla rättigheter reserverade.