Last week I was at the National Association of Government Web Professionals (NAGW) to present on my atomic hub-and-spoke model (more on this soon). While I was there, I was talking with Rob Carr from the WebAIM team, and we were doing what two accessibility people do when they get together: complaining. This time it was about educational tools, specifically the people who build them misunderstanding how the exceptions to 1.1.1 work.
Everyone knows 1.1.1 Non-text Content. It’s the first criterion, the most-tested, the one that shows up in every automated scanner output. All non-text content needs a text alternative that serves an equivalent purpose.
Comments closed









