Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

arXiv:2609.38377 (cs)
[Submitted on 29 Sep 2026]

Title:PhyProbe: Rethinking Physical Consistency Evaluation in Generated Videos

Authors:Max Ku, Jiaojiao Fan, Zekun Hao, Francesco Ferroni, Heng Wang, Wenhu Chen, Ming-Yu Liu, Prithvijit Chattopadhyay
View a PDF of the paper titled PhyProbe: Rethinking Physical Consistency Evaluation in Generated Videos, by Max Ku and Jiaojiao Fan and Zekun Hao and Francesco Ferroni and Heng Wang and Wenhu Chen and Ming-Yu Liu and Prithvijit Chattopadhyay
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Evaluating the physical consistency of generated videos remains a fundamental challenge. Existing approaches rely on off-the-shelf vision-language models, which can often be myopic to physical dynamics, or fine-tuned evaluators trained on human annotations, which overfit to dataset-specific cues and fail to generalize. A key challenge is that existing supervision sources provide either relative ordering or absolute scores, but not both reliably and consistently across varied settings. To this end, we introduce PhyProbe, an evaluator that extracts features from a frozen pretrained spatio-temporal encoder and maps them to a scalar physical consistency violation score via a lightweight scoring head. PhyProbe is trained through a unified objective combining pairwise ranking, regression on noisy scalar annotations, and anchor-based calibration over a curated set of heterogeneous supervision sources. Experiments show that PhyProbe outperforms prior methods on most pairwise benchmarks spanning real-generated and generated-generated pairs under varying correspondence, with the largest gains in no-correspondence and generated-generated settings where existing fine-tuned evaluators degrade sharply. PhyProbe achieves strong correlation with human judgments, with close agreement between rank-based and linear metrics, indicating that scores are both well ordered and anchored to a stable [0, 1] scale. Further, despite being trained on supervision indicative of physical consistency, without explicit general-preference labels, PhyProbe also performs competitively on human preference benchmarks: consistent with the observation that physics violations are entangled with broader quality degradations.
Comments: NeurIPS 2026 poster
Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.38377 [cs.CV]
  (or arXiv:2609.38377v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38377
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Max W.F. Ku [view email]
[v1] Tue, 29 Sep 2026 18:35:23 UTC (3,400 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled PhyProbe: Rethinking Physical Consistency Evaluation in Generated Videos, by Max Ku and Jiaojiao Fan and Zekun Hao and Francesco Ferroni and Heng Wang and Wenhu Chen and Ming-Yu Liu and Prithvijit Chattopadhyay
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences